US debt limit: Obama and Boehner trade blows on impasse
President Obama: A significant number of Republicans in Congress are insisting on a "cuts-only approach"
US President Barack Obama and Republican House Speaker John Boehner have blamed each other for the standoff over the federal debt crisis, as a deadline to avert a default looms.
Mr Obama condemned the Republicans' insistence on steep budget cuts and warned of a "reckless" outcome if the debt ceiling is not raised by Congress.
Mr Boehner responded by accusing the president of seeking a "blank cheque".
The US risks default without a deal to raise the borrowing limit by 2 August.
The federal government runs a budget deficit that topped $1.5tn (£920bn) this year, and has amassed a national debt of $14.3tn.
'Balanced approach'Votes to raise the US debt limit have historically been a matter of routine in the US Congress, but this year, Republicans - buoyed by a newly elected crop of fiscal conservatives - have refused to agree to a debt increase without significant reductions in the budget deficit.
In negotiations, the chief sticking points are Republican resistance to raising taxes and the Democrats' desire to protect social programmes for the poor and elderly, and a public pension scheme.
“Start Quote
End QuoteDespite all the usual guff about the USA being 'a grand experiment in compromise' this is now a rather nasty game of chicken”
In a live televised address on Monday night, Mr Obama said: "Republican House members have essentially said that the only way they'll vote to prevent America's first-ever default is if the rest of us agree to their deep, spending cuts-only approach."
The president reiterated his call for a "balanced approach", based on a mixture of spending cuts and tax increases on the rich.
He said the only reason this was not "on its way to becoming law right now is because a significant number of Republicans in Congress are insisting on a cuts-only approach".
That approach, he added, "doesn't ask the wealthiest Americans or biggest corporations to contribute anything at all".
He said: "Most Americans, regardless of political party, don't understand how we can ask a senior citizen to pay more for her Medicare before we ask corporate jet owners and oil companies to give up tax breaks that other companies don't get."
Clock tickingResponding to the president immediately after his speech, Mr Boehner insisted the US government's "spending binge" was over.
John Boehner: "The president wanted a blank cheque six months ago and he wants a blank cheque today"
"The president has often said we need a 'balanced' approach - which in Washington means: we spend more... you pay more. Having run a small business, I know those tax increases will destroy jobs."
Mr Boehner agreed the US "cannot default on its debt obligations", but showed no indication he or his Republican caucus were willing to compromise on tax increases.
And he called on Democrats to approve Republican proposals.
The president and Republican and Democratic leaders of the House and Senate have been negotiating for weeks over legislation to raise the debt ceiling and cut the nation's budget deficit.
What happens if US defaults?
Uncharted territory but two scenarios emerge
Worst case:
- Higher interest rates on mortgages, credit cards and loans
- Government unable to pay wages to staff, including military
- Social security cheques stopped
- Turmoil on international markets
Better case:
- Default could be avoided by paying creditors, at expense of slashing spending
Sources: Associated Press, CBS, ABC
The talks have broken down several times. In order to become law, any plan would require agreement from disparate factions within both parties and to pass both chambers of Congress.
On Tuesday, IMF chief Christine Lagarde pressed the US to resolve the stalemate, warning the country could face another jobless recovery.
"The clock is ticking and clearly the issue needs to be resolved immediately," Ms Lagarde told the Council on Foreign Relations in New York.
Protecting social programmesIn Monday's latest round of negotiations, Senate Democrats introduced a proposal that would trim $2.7tn (£1.66tn) over a decade.
The plan would protect social programmes for the poor and elderly and a public pension programme - all popular among Democrats. It would not raise new tax revenue.
House Republicans, meanwhile, unveiled their own plan that included $1.2tn (£736tn) in cuts caps on future spending, and offered a $1tn debt ceiling increase - not enough to last through the 2012 election.
In his White House address later, Mr Obama firmly rejected the Republican plan, in part because it would require another round of debt limit talks in six months.
"We know what we have to do to reduce our deficits," he said. "There's no point in putting the economy at risk by kicking the can further down the road."
He endorsed the Senate Democrats' plan as "a much better path", though one that would fall short of his goals to reform the tax system and social programmes.
If the debt ceiling is not raised, the US Treasury could run out of money to pay all of its bills - which could lead to interest rate rises, threaten the US economy and in turn the global recovery.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~21~RS~)

US job creation strong in April
Search for US tornado survivors
Smarter future
Light relief
Re-verse
Day in picturess
A leaf from nature's book
Click
Comment number 97.
Matt Hawkins26th July 2011 - 16:19
The solution is to not spend more money than you make. Simple.
War? Space programme? You can't afford it.
How did the US build up a debt of 14 trillion dollars without anyone in the whole country thinking that was a bad idea?
We are often told how "strong" the US economy is but the reality is my household finances are "stronger" than the US economy and have been for a number of years.
Link to this (Comment number 97)
Comment number 86.
Roo26th July 2011 - 15:58
In the end, both sides will compromise and approve the extension of the debt ceiling.What is shameful is the childish politicking that goes on prior to reaching this foregone conclusion. The President's illusion that consensus can be built and the republican's illusion they can set the 'way-back' machine for 1950 has provided nothing but market chaos. A poor showing from all.
Link to this (Comment number 86)
Comment number 46.
Jack Napier26th July 2011 - 14:51
Both Republicans and Democrats seem to palying a high stakes game of chicken over over the defbt crises, which is already damagiing the US in the world markets.
I don't understand why they can't compromise, and I don't understand why the Republicans think that raising taxes to pay off the debt more quickly is such an unacceptable concept.
Link to this (Comment number 46)
Comment number 37.
carl c26th July 2011 - 14:31
Seems like an 'elephant in the room' scenario - Obama has only made token gestures to cut public spending or to increase revenue whereas the Republicans seem to want some more tangible action to address a growing problem.
2 things seem certain; 1. USA cannot keep spending at this rate & 2. USA as one of the largest economies cannot be the first to default in debts, global meltdown would follow!
Link to this (Comment number 37)
Comment number 31.
Don Miles26th July 2011 - 14:05
The US budget debate is an example of the freezing up of problem solving there. It is in the US's self-interest to come to a resolution of the budget conflict. But there is a better than equal chance that the problem will not be solved. In my view, the US is locked in an ineffectual position on such problem solving. I would not necessarily expect this matter to be solved as hoped.
Link to this (Comment number 31)
Comments 5 of 6