Bin Laden and South Asian peace

India and Pakistan flags A stalemate does not help the neighbours

Sections of the Indian media and some pundits have been gloating about the fact that Osama Bin Laden was eventually found and killed in Pakistan by the US.

It is a familiar, triumphal "we-told-you-so" line, reminding the world that Pakistan was a haven for terrorists.

Some experts - egged on by a hysterical sabre-rattling media - have even been suggesting that India should also go into Pakistan and take out people like the cleric Hafiz Mohammad Saeed who have been blamed for plotting attacks against India. Foreign affairs guru Fareed Zakaria describes it as the rhetoric of India's strategic elite with its "Cold War fantasies".

Not surprisingly, this has evoked a harsh reaction from Pakistan Foreign Secretary Salman Bashir who warned against such "misadventures" which could lead to a "terrible catastrophe", and headlines in the Indian newspapers as 'Hit by US, Pakistan barks at India'.

Much of this reckless talk, of course, has its roots in the grievous losses India has suffered in violence planned and executed by groups across the border, climaxing in the nightmare of the 2008 Mumbai (Bombay) attacks. But, as many seasoned experts say, India needs to keep its calm and pursue a more hard-nosed pragmatic policy towards Pakistan.

So it is heartening to hear from sources in the Indian government that India believes in a more reasoned and sober approach to Pakistan.

India cannot, say the sources, use what they call a "giant swatter" approach to Pakistan, like the US. "Unlike US, we live next door to Pakistan, our ties are deeper, and we were once the same country," they say. Also, nuclear-armed Pakistan is no pushover, and India could burn its fingers badly if it attempted an operation like the one which took out Bin Laden.

Will Bin Laden's killing have an impact on India-Pakistan talks, which got off the ground in recent months after a long frozen silence?

Not really, say Indian authorities.

File picture of Mumbai attacks The Mumbai attack led to worsening of relations between the two countries

They say India is not interested in humiliating Pakistan, and that talks will continue. There are no great expectations, but what do you expect from early dialogue between two countries who do not trust each other? That the two sides are talking again is heartening enough.

The government also believes, quite correctly, that Bin Laden's death will not mean the end of terrorism. India, sources say, insists that Pakistan take even-handed, demonstrable action against all militant groups on its soil, irrespective of their ideologies and targets. There are worries in India that with increasingly closer links between the groups across the border there will be more attacks on India.

Many pundits have spoken about the US hastening its departure plans from Afghanistan, now that Bin Laden is dead.

This is a naïvely simplistic understanding of the situation, Indian sources believe. They say that the Americans have "learnt the lessons" of the post-Soviet withdrawal in Afghanistan, and they will not repeat it again. And there is no need to bristle about the blow-hot, blow-cold relationship between the US and Pakistan, the say. "This is unpalatable, but we will have to accept this," said a source.

But the two neighbours must keep talking because a hostile stalemate helps no one and deepens distrust. India and Pakistan direly need to trust each other - at least in cases where it is in their self-interest to co-operate.

Soutik Biswas, Delhi correspondent Article written by Soutik Biswas Soutik Biswas Delhi correspondent

Why India's sanitation crisis kills women

The gruesome rape and hanging of two teenage girls in the populous Uttar Pradesh state again proves how women have become the biggest victims of India's sanitation crisis.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Soutik


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 63.

    there is too much turmoil in pakistan right now;let things settle down;let us hope for a civilian govt which will have army under its control and would like to have peace with india;

  • rate this

    Comment number 62.

    Pakistan has used most of the cash they got from US to fight terrorism to build there nuclear arsenals against India and support terrorists to world against the Indians and the same Americans. Nobody understands if America will ever learn to handle this rough state?

  • rate this

    Comment number 61.

    1stly after the Mumbai attacks, India should really be ashamed of itself how it handled the situation. the public was more brave than the police force, it should be a wake up call to india! 2ndly no one can trust pakistan, it should has no business in afghan politics or development as it shows it cannot maintain its own development and security.

  • rate this

    Comment number 60.

    To avoid military and political conflicts between countries, All the Countries in the world can elect a president of the world in democratic way to run the govenment of the world with single currency, military & economy. All the people in this world can be citizen of the world without fighting each other.
    Why do we need so many countries, so many Armies & so many conflicts?

  • rate this

    Comment number 59.

    @Nzeb #51

    I dont understand why Pakistanis like to call themselves victims when they are solely responsible for the state of thier nation. If your country did not have low self esteem in regards to india there would be no terrorists to send over the border.

    Pakistan is like the person that sets their house on fire and blames their neighbor instead.


Comments 5 of 63



  • Krak des ChevaliersSitting targets

    How ancient treasures in Syria are being bombed to pieces

  • Mesut Ozil's tattoo reads "Only God can judge me"Ink explained

    Nine World Cup players' tattoos decoded, and one who refuses

  • Google sweetsName game

    Would Google have made it as BackRub?

  • Putting a coin in supermarket trolleyMinor annoyance

    Why are Morrisons getting rid of coin-locks on trolleys?

  • A graphic on the Human Events Facebook page comparing Jackie Kennedy and Michelle Obama.First ladies

    Why is Michelle Obama being compared to Jackie Kennedy?

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.