UN inspectors leave Syria as US weighs 'limited act'

 

Barack Obama: "We're not considering any boots on the ground approach"

UN inspectors investigating the alleged use of chemical weapons in Syria have left Damascus.

They crossed into neighbouring Lebanon just hours after President Barack Obama said the US was considering a "limited narrow act" against Syria.

Citing a US intelligence assessment, Secretary of State John Kerry accused Syria of using chemical weapons to kill 1,429 people, including 426 children.

Syria said the US claim was "full of lies", blaming rebels for the attacks.

The UN inspectors - investigating what happened in the Damascus suburbs on 21 August - left their hotel in the Syrian capital in a convoy of vehicles on Saturday morning and later arrived in Lebanon.

During their visit, they carried out four days of inspections.

It could be two weeks before their final report is ready, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has told diplomats.

Analysis

The departure of the United Nations weapons inspectors from Syria removes both a practical and a political obstacle to the launch of American-led military action.

Any attack that might have placed them in danger was unthinkable and would have seemed premature before their work on the ground was complete.

Their task isn't over now that their convoy has crossed the Lebanese border - they still have samples to analyse and reports to prepare. But it's been clear all along that American planning has been based on its own independent intelligence.

Syrians living near military installations thought likely to be attacked are continuing to lay in extra supplies of food - or to move their families to safety where they can.

Everyone appears to believe an attack will go ahead, not least because America has to demonstrate the credibility of the red line which it has said the use of chemical weapons would represent.

Their departure from Syria removes both a practical and a political obstacle to the launch of American-led military action, the BBC's Kevin Connolly in Beirut reports.

Any attack that might have placed them in danger was unthinkable and would have seemed premature before their work on the ground was complete, our correspondent adds.

Russia - a key ally of Syria - has warned that "any unilateral military action bypassing the UN Security Council" would be a "direct violation of international law".

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has said his country will defend itself against any Western "aggression". French President Francois Hollande has reaffirmed his support for the US stance.

World's 'obligation'

Speaking on Friday, President Obama said the alleged attack in Damascus' suburbs on 21 August was "a challenge to the world" that threatened America's "national security interests".

"We cannot accept a world where women and children and innocent civilians are gassed on a terrible scale.

"The world has an obligation to make sure that we maintain the norm against the use of chemical weapons."

The BBC's security correspondent Frank Gardner examines what we know about the Syria attack on 21 August

But the US leader stressed that Washington was "looking at the possibility of a limited, narrow act", and there would be "no boots on the ground" or "long-term campaign".

Mr Obama comments came shortly after Secretary of State John Kerry laid out a raft of what Washington said was a "high confidence" intelligence assessment about the attack.

The main findings of the released unclassified summary state that:

  • the attack killed 1,429 people, including 426 children
  • Syrian military chemical weapons personnel were operating in the area in the three days before the attack
  • Satellite evidence shows rockets launched from government-held areas 90 minutes before first report of chemical attack
  • 100 videos attributed to the attack show symptoms consistent with exposure to nerve agent
  • Communications were intercepted involving a senior Damascus official who "confirmed chemical weapons were used" and was concerned about UN inspectors obtaining evidence

The US said its assessment was backed by accounts from medical personnel, witnesses, journalists, videos and thousands of social media reports.

Mr Kerry said the US already had the facts, and nothing that the UN inspectors found could tell the world anything new.

He also described Mr Assad as "a thug and a murderer".

US Secretary of State John Kerry did far more than set out a moral case for military action.

What he did was make it impossible for President Barack Obama to back away from it. He said if the US didn't act, history would judge them harshly.

If they turned a blind eye, it would embolden dictators in Iran and North Korea and leave the US without credibility in the world.

Mr Obama has made similar points himself. It is not the first time Kerry has made the case. But these were the strongest words yet.

When Mr Obama spoke he sounded pretty downbeat by comparison, although he too pointed firmly towards some form of action.

But he was keen to stress that any action would be limited, unlike Afghanistan or Iraq, and would not involve boots on the ground.

There are increasing mutterings from Congress, asking him how certain he is of that.

In response, Syria's state-run news agency Sana said Mr Kerry was using "material based on old stories which were published by terrorists over a week ago".

'Strong message'

The UN Security Council is unlikely to approve any military intervention because of opposition from Russia - one of the five permanent members.

Moscow, along with China, has vetoed two previous draft resolutions on Syria.

The US was also dealt a blow on Thursday when the UK parliament rejected a motion supporting the principle of military intervention.

The vote rules the UK out of any potential military alliance.

British Prime Minister David Cameron and Mr Obama spoke over the telephone on Friday, agreeing to continue to co-operate on international issues.

The president told Mr Cameron he "fully respected" the approach taken by the UK government.

US officials said they would continue to push for a coalition, and France said it was ready to take action in Syria alongside the US.

Mr Obama and French President Francois Hollande discussed the issue in a telephone conversation on Friday, Paris said.

It said that both leaders wanted to send Damascus a "strong message" to condemn the alleged use of chemical weapons.

Neither France nor the US needs parliamentary approval for military action.

Another US ally, Turkey, called for action similar to the Nato bombing raids in the former Yugoslavia in 1999.

Nato carried out 70 days of air strikes to protect civilians from attack in Kosovo, despite not having a UN resolution.

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan also said that any military intervention should be aimed at toppling Mr Assad.

Sarin stockpile

The use of chemical weapons is banned under several treaties, and considered illegal under customary international humanitarian law.

The Syrian army is known to have stockpiles of sarin and other chemical agents.

Earlier accounts of the attack in Damascus quoted officials from medical charity Medecins Sans Frontieres as saying 355 people had been killed.

The UN inspectors have collected various samples that will now be examined in laboratories across the world.

The UN team is not mandated to apportion blame for the attacks.

More than 100,000 people are estimated to have died since the conflict erupted in Syria in March 2011, and the conflict has produced at least 1.7 million refugees.

Syria map

Forces which could be used against Syria:

Four US destroyers - USS Gravely, USS Ramage, USS Barry and USS Mahan - are in the eastern Mediterranean, equipped with cruise missiles. The missiles can also be fired from submarines, but the US Navy does not reveal their locations

Airbases at Incirlik and Izmir in Turkey, and in Jordan, could be used to carry out strikes

Two aircraft carriers - USS Nimitz and USS Harry S Truman are in the wider region

French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle is currently in Toulon in the western Mediterranean

French Raffale and Mirage aircraft can also operate from Al-Dhahra airbase in the UAE

 

More on This Story

Syria conflict

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 30.

    How about the US focusses instead on its own domestic affairs. 17 trillion in debt and considering more war! There is no obligation to be seen as the world police now. Dealing with these situations require an international front to be more credible. Otherwise might as well forget the UN like the world did with the League of nations and risk WW3!!! STAY OUT Obama!

  • rate this
    +10

    Comment number 29.

    US claim on Syria 'nonsense' - Putin
    Breaking news
    Russia's President Vladimir Putin dismisses US claims that Syria's regime used chemical weapons as "utter nonsense"
    _________

    I would say the same for the BBC they keep giving us the same story's of the rebels are good and the regime is bad. They are both the same Bad Bad Bad.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 28.

    He's just trying to look tough. I notice Putin is saying the chemical weeapons claim is nonsense. All the warmongers look a bit silly now.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 27.

    Well done BBC and other assorted media... Another Arab / African nation painted as a terrorist, military and / or nuclear / chemical threat and they are attacking their own citizens... Great work building the public to another invasion using all kinds of spin and rhetoric, who's next? Weall know, iraq, Lybia, Syria... Iran - the allies of Russia.

  • rate this
    +9

    Comment number 26.

    The Bully Boys are itching for action - again. Thank goodness we won't be experiencing any 'friendly fire' this time around...

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 25.

    News release: 28 August 2013.

    MSF today warned that its medical information could not be used as evidence to certify the precise origin of the exposure to a neurotoxic agent nor to attribute responsibility.


    Saturday [24th August], MSF said that three hospitals it supports in Syria’s Damascus governorate had reportedly received 3,600 patients displaying neurotoxic symptoms, of which 355 died.

  • rate this
    +17

    Comment number 24.

    Very unimpressed with the emotional Dr on Newsnight who wants to bomb for peace.

    She seemed very ignorant of history or warfare.

  • rate this
    +18

    Comment number 23.

    Attack Afghanistan to get Bin Ladin - but Bin Ladin in Pakistan.

    Attack Iraq to remove WMD - but no WMD.

    Now attack Syria because the regime has used Chemical Weapons - but evidence suggests weapons were used by the opposition.

    So glad the UK is out of this new nightmare.

  • rate this
    +12

    Comment number 22.

    I'm glad we won't be providing military support for this. The US doesn't need our help to mess up the world. Aligning ourselves with them in this way is just political posturing and they are just looking for others to share the fallout when it all goes wrong.

  • rate this
    +8

    Comment number 21.

    Is it possible to take Nobel prize back from this warmonger?

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 20.

    Only fools rush in.
    Wait for the UN verdict. New evidence is coming to light. We have a view presented here and we have "independent" news. This article is not he article by Dale Gavlak. It covers Build up of arms & rebel forces over last 2 weeks. http://www.worldtribune.com/2013/08/28/mounting-evidence-raises-questions-about-syrian-chemical-weapon-attack/
    Surely such reports need to be tested

  • rate this
    -11

    Comment number 19.

    UN should kick Russia and China out of Security Council. They are very redundant, because they have never voted “yes” to deliver prompt justices. That is why UN loses t its credibility and irritates Western. UN is a bad origination, full of corruption, selfishness and laziness. UN let us down.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 18.

    Obama looks about 20 years older than he did in 2008.

  • rate this
    +8

    Comment number 17.

    What a shame .....i thought obama would be a good leader and get away from the stupid american dogma of the past 50 years

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 16.

    Comment 2. Agreed. There's a lot more going on in the world and the UK isn't going to take part in this particular war, so let's focus on something else. I know the BBC likes a good juicy disaster, but how about looking at some of the things that are going well in the world? Wouldn't that be news!

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 15.

    Even if Chemical weapons have been used, they killed 1429 out of the over 100000 people who have died from this conflict. Why is this a sudden trigger point to intervene? So both sides can murder each other with conventional munitions to their heart's content, but it takes someone using a chemical weapon to intervene?

    Just stay out of this messy conflict. It'll do everyone a lot of good.

  • rate this
    +19

    Comment number 14.

    “Read for yourselves the evidence from thousands of sources,” Mr. Kerry said (presumably snickering over the fact that the US intelligence report contained no such "evidence" for anyone to read, just claims that they had seen such evidence).

    the British JIC *Report* was the same. Not one bit of something concrete or independently verifiable.

    "we know" and "trust us" is not evidence.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 13.

    "limited narrow act" - Do you mean bombing Mr Obama?

  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 12.

    They keep invading countries in the middle east, and always for different reasons. Does not a conventional bomb or bullets hurt people just the same, do they not get burned and dismembered? We have seen friendly fire incidents that show what happens. Pictures on the news of people frozen solid charred as they stepped out of their tanks. Bullets really hurt, and leave many injured / disabled..

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 11.

    @1 spider. You wally!

    @2 Warmongerers Humiliated - we weren't involved in the Japanese 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami but it is still a news item. Wally.

 

Page 6 of 7

 

More Middle East stories

RSS

Features

  • Shinji Mikamo's father's watchTime peace

    The story of the watch that survived Hiroshima


  • Northern League supporters at the party's annual meeting in 2011Padania?

    Eight places in Europe that also want independence


  • Elephant Diaries - BBCGoing wild

    Wildlife film-makers reveal the tricks of the trade


  • Hamas rally in the West Bank village of Yatta, 2006Hamas hopes

    Why the Palestinian group won't back down yet


  • A woman dining aloneTable for one

    The restaurants that love solo diners


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.