Syria's Bashar al-Assad will fight Western 'aggression'
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has said his country will defend itself against Western aggression, as the UK and US seek support for intervention.
The five permanent UN Security Council members held a short meeting, but diplomats said they were "far apart".
The US and UK say the Assad regime killed hundreds in recent poison gas attacks. Damascus, backed by Russia, blames the attacks on rebels.
But in London, MPs have voted against possible military action.
The government motion - to support in principle British involvement in military action - was defeated by 285 votes to 272 late on Thursday.
Prime Minster David Cameron said it was clear the parliament does not want action and "the government will act accordingly".
Britain has tended to march in lockstep with the US and this rejection of President Barack Obama's argument will leave bruises”
Defence Secretary Philip Hammond later told the BBC's Newsnight programme that there would not now be any British involvement in Syria.
But he added: "I expect that the US and other countries will continue to look at responses to the chemical attack. I don't expect that the lack of British participation will stop any action."
Reacting to the parliamentary vote in Britain, the White House said in a statement that Washington "will continue to consult with the UK government - one of our closest allies and friends".
"President Obama's decision-making will be guided by what is in the best interests of the United States. He believes that there are core interests at stake for the United States and that countries who violate international norms regarding chemical weapons need to be held accountable," the statement added.
Separately, the BBC has seen evidence of killings perpetrated by Syrian government forces in northern Aleppo province.
The BBC's Ian Pannell visited a school playground that had been hit by napalm or another incendiary substance.
Hospital staff and witnesses said 10 people had been killed and many more left with horrific burns.'Unanimous reaction' urged
UN chemical weapons experts are in Syria investigating the alleged poison-gas attacks, which took place in eastern Damascus on 21 August and left at least 355 dead.
They are due to finish their work on Friday and give their preliminary findings to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon at the weekend.
Samples taken during their site visits will be tested in various European laboratories.
It is unclear when the inspectors' final report will be released. The UN has said the tests will take "longer than days".
Rarely does a British parliamentary vote echo around the world. But the rejection of any prospect of British involvement in a potential military strike against Syria has both simplified and complicated the calculus facing President Barack Obama as he struggles to decide on the timing of military action against the Assad regime.
The vote has simplified things in one way - the timetable is now easier. There is no requirement to wait for a second British parliamentary vote.
The US may also be less interested in pursuing a futile search for UN Security Council backing for the use of force; Russia has made it clear that such support will not be forthcoming. But things are also more complicated.
Is Mr Obama now ready to go it alone? US officials say that he is. Will he wait for UN inspectors to complete their task? Could strikes come this weekend? And how far might the UK vote influence support for such action, not just on Capitol Hill but crucially in the American heartland?
Their mandate does not involve apportioning blame for the attacks.
The UK pushed for a UN Security Council resolution facilitating the use of force on Wednesday, but no agreement was reached.
The five permanent members ended their meeting after less than an hour.
A diplomat told the BBC that there had been "no meeting of minds", with Russia and China on one side, and the US, UK and France on the other.
Russia, which has twice blocked resolutions condemning Mr Assad, called the meeting.
Analysts say Moscow is unlikely to agree to any resolution approving the use of force in Syria.
Russia has close ties with the Assad government, supplying its armed forces with weapons and housing its warships in Syria's ports.
Earlier, German Chancellor Angela Merkel spoke to Russian President Vladimir Putin over the phone to urge Russia to help the Security Council frame a "quick, unanimous international reaction".
US officials are expected to brief senior Congress politicians later on the evidence against Mr Assad's government.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest strongly denied comparisons between potential US action in Syria, and the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
"What we saw in [Iraq] was an administration that was searching high and low to produce evidence to justify a military invasion," he said.
"What we have seen here, tragically, is a preponderance of evidence available in the public domain that the Assad regime used chemical weapons against innocent civilians."
He insisted that the US was not contemplating "regime change" in Syria, and any intervention would be "very discrete and limited".Continue reading the main story
Mr Assad told a group of Yemeni MPs on Thursday that Syria would defend itself against any aggression, according to Syria's Sana news agency.
Models for possible intervention
- Iraq 1991: US-led global military coalition with UN mandate
- Balkans 1990s: US arms supplied to anti-Serb resistance in defiance of UN-mandated embargo; later US-led air campaign
- Somalia 1992-93: UN-authorised force; US military involvement culminated in disaster
- Libya 2011: UN-authorised air offensive
"Syria, with its steadfast people and brave army, will continue eliminating terrorism, which is utilised by Israel and Western countries to serve their interests in fragmenting the region," he said.
In Damascus, senior military commanders are reportedly staying away from buildings thought likely to be targeted.
Many Damascus residents have fled the city in fear of an impending attack.
Long lines of cars loaded with suitcases have been waiting at the main Masnaa border crossing into Lebanon.
But state television is portraying citizens going about their normal lives, seemingly unperturbed by the prospect of military strikes.
More than 100,000 people are estimated to have died since the conflict erupted in Syria in March 2011, and the conflict has produced at least 1.7 million refugees.Forces which could be used against Syria
- Four US destroyers - USS Gravely, USS Ramage, USS Barry and USS Mahan are in the eastern Mediterranean, equipped with cruise missiles
- Cruise missiles could also be launched from submarines, including a British Trafalgar class boat; HMS Tireless was reportedly sighted in Gibraltar at the weekend
- Airbases at Incirlik and Izmir in Turkey, and in Jordan, could be used to carry out strikes
- Two aircraft carriers - USS Nimitz and USS Harry S Truman, along with escort ships, are in the wider region
- The Royal Navy's response force task group - which includes helicopter carrier HMS Illustrious and frigates HMS Montrose and HMS Westminster - is in the region on a scheduled deployment
- RAF Akrotiri airbase in Cyprus could also be used
- French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle is currently in Toulon in the western Mediterranean
- French Raffale and Mirage aircraft can also operate from Al-Dhahra airbase in the UAE