Why there is more to Syria conflict than sectarianism

Men in traditional Syrian costume offer prayers in the courtyard of the Umayyad Mosque, in Damascus March 23, 2013 Sunni Muslims comprise about 75% of the Syrian population, with the remainder split between Christians, Alawites, Druze and Ismailis

"There is no nation of Arabs", the explorer and archaeologist Gertrude Bell wrote in 1907, "the Syrian country is inhabited by Arabic speaking races all eager to be at each other's throats."

The current conflict in that country is often branded sectarian too - yet despite the statements of some of the belligerent ideologists many Syrians refuse to accept the characterisation of it as a war based upon religion. So where does the truth lie?

Between the early 16th Century and 1918 the Ottoman Empire ruled much of the Middle East, including Syria. It tolerated non-Muslims, fostering cosmopolitan cities like Aleppo and Damascus, where many different creeds lived and traded in an interdependent manner.

Indeed the Ottoman system, which taxed non-Muslims at higher rates became financially dependent on this multi-cultural system carrying on.

While life between these different groups often carried on happily, the Ottoman system created intricate scheme of rules and restrictions, for example over where you lived or who carried out certain trades, which produced a highly developed sense of identity and group separation - inter-marriage was discouraged, not least by religious leaders.

Watch Mark Urban's film on Syria's long and complex history in full

In this elaborate pecking order members of Muslim sects regarded by the Sunni leaders as heretical, such as the Druze, Ismailis and Alawites, ranked below other 'people of the book', Jews and Christians.

Indeed Johann Ludwig Burckhardt, who travelled around Syria during 1810-12 found members of these Islamic sects operating underground, fearing death and pretending to be Sunnis, since they knew, "there is no instance whatever of pagans being tolerated".

Burckhardt saw that similar, violent, differences existed within the Christian community, notably between followers of Catholicism and Greek Orthodoxy.

He described the phenomenon as a, "system of intolerance, at which the Turkish governors smile, because they are constantly gainers by it".

The final decades of Ottoman rule were marked by growing instability and uncertainty, as some parts of the empire broke free to independence, and Western powers became increasingly involved, claiming to be the protectors of minority rights. In 1860 anti-Christian riots in Damascus left 8,000 dead.

Start Quote

It is the long inheritance of Syria's history that leaves its traces of the Baathist or Ottoman belief that all peoples can get along in the greater national interest, and a certainty that for centuries people co-operated perfectly well”

End Quote

When the British Army conquered Syria in 1918, the jostling for power between different groups became febrile. General Sir Edmund Allenby wrote from Damascus, "all nations and would-be nations and all shades of religions and politics are up against each other".

These tensions were managed to some extent by the French, who ran Syria between the World Wars, with a system of divide and rule. It had one important difference from that of the Ottomans. Sensing that the Sunni majority were in many ways their most violent and difficult constituency, the French kept them in check by advancing minorities in the army and other security forces.

By the time Syria's post-war nationalist civilian governments were overtaken by military rule in 1963, Christians, Druze and Alawites held many of the senior military jobs. By this time the secular, socialistic, pan-Arab ideology of the Baath Party had also become very important in the officer corps and it further empowered the minorities.

While anti-sectarian ideology became a central plank of the Baath Party, factions within it could not escape their sense of identity and tallying of who was lining up with whom. In 1966, for example, the loser of one army power struggle, a Druze, complained the Alawites were taking over, noting, "the sectarian spirit is spread in a shameful way in Syria, particularly in the army, in the appointment of officers and even recruits".

Hafez al-Assad, the father of the current Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, emerged victorious from these power struggles in 1970, and gradually managed to clamp down on his rivals, purging dissidents. Although he became the first Alawite president of Syria and put many members of his sect into key positions, Assad senior sought to portray his regime as non-sectarian: some of those he had defeated were also fellow Alawites, and some his supporters, such as the Tlass clan of his long-serving defence minister were Sunni, or from other non-Alawite minorities.

Ottoman governor Jamal Pasha The Ottoman governor of Syria, Jamal Pasha, rides through Damascus in 1917

Even today, Bashar al-Assad's government generally avoids sectarian language, although the departure of key former supporters such as the Tlass family has left him ever more dependent on the Alawites and some other groups. The Damascus government's attempts to blame "foreign terrorists" and al-Qaeda for the country's difficulties harks back to its long term opposition to militant Sunni ideology.

In 1982 the regime crushed a rising by the Muslim Brotherhood in the city of Hama, leaving an estimated 20,000 dead. Although this was officially portrayed as a battle against a kind of extremism that endangered the country's multiculturalism, it was seen in many quarters as an attempt to thwart the Sunni majority from deciding Syria's future - and indeed this is how many members of that group view the current campaign of repression.

As the violence in Syria has intensified, outsiders have backed the different sides, and set the conflict into the context of a wider Sunni-Shia clash. Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, leader of Lebanon's militant Shia Hezbollah movement, in seeking to justify his fighters' entry into the war has lambasted "takfiri" groups - a term for Sunni Jihadists who, like those Ottoman rulers of past centuries, regard Shias or Alawites as heretics fit for execution.

Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, an influential Egyptian Sunni cleric, responded by calling two days ago for a Jihad against Hezbollah and Iranian interests in Syria. He says it is the duty of every Sunni to fight.

Demonstrators hold up a poster of President al-Assad President Bashar al-Assad is a member of the Alawite community

Watching videos from the frontline of Qusair yesterday, it is interesting to see how this language of holy war - from outsiders it should be noted - has permeated to the Syrian foot soldiers. Sunni opposition fighters, taking a position manned by what they believe are Lebanese Shia fighters, refer several times to the "Party of Satan", a play on Hezbollah, which means Party of God.

Even at this dire hour, Syrian opposition people tell me about the Christians or Alawites in their movement, emphatically rejecting the label of Sunni Jihadists. Or government supporters will note the presence of non-Alawites in the higher reaches of the regime. Each meanwhile tries to tar their opponent with the sectarian label.

It is the long inheritance of Syria's history that leaves its traces of the Baathist or Ottoman belief that all peoples can get along in the greater national interest, and a certainty that for centuries people co-operated perfectly well.

But it is also this heritage that has left their society largely unintegrated, intensely aware of sectarian identity, and open - at least in part - to the messages of those who preach holy war.

Mark Urban Article written by Mark Urban Mark Urban Diplomatic and defence editor, BBC Newsnight

New Nato boss Jens Stoltenberg on alliance's challenges

With most Nato members intent on cutting defence spending, Mark Urban asks the alliance's new chief Jens Stoltenberg how he can stop it becoming an association of broken promises.

Read full article

More on This Story

Syria conflict

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 14.

    "The Scottish will for tribal independence that runs to this day"

    J have you never spoken to a wide range of Scots to write this tripe. I, a Scot, actually will be voting NO, better the devil you know. Who wants to be part of the EU??

  • rate this

    Comment number 13.

    The arming of Syrian rebels by the West is part of a process that has been going on for years.Money was made by the Bilderbergers in Yugoslavia, Vietnam, supplying mines to Angola, they made a mint from WW2 (even arming Hitler), the Taliban during the Russian invasion of Afghanistan and it will go on. The reason they'll be allowed to continue is because people will claim it as a Conspiracy Theory.

  • rate this

    Comment number 12.

    It all boils down to religion and we should be very careful with this lot!

    In the west we have got rid of the hypocrisy of religious faith but Islam seems to think they have an opportunity to fill the vacuum. Instead of realising they are the worse option of what we have just got rid of.

  • rate this

    Comment number 11.

    Perhaps if the USA and the EU stopped arming the terrorists, sorry "rebels" who are most certainly not Syrian, the killings may actually stop. Oh, and the beheading - are you talking about Syria or Saudi Arabia. To date - no country anywhere on the planet has been better off because of Europe. Maybe they should stop interfering in other countries businesses and worry about the EU disintegrating?

  • rate this

    Comment number 10.

    Can the BBC follow up what happened to Carla del Ponte, after she has made the comments that the UN has proof that rebels were using chemical weapons.
    Any follow up on the 12 rebel fighters arrested in Turkey for possessing chemical weapons and the means to deliver them.
    Or the ones arrested in Iraq for possessing chemical weapons?

  • rate this

    Comment number 9.

    This Guardian article is worth a read; it tells us who are behind Syria's current troubles.
    There is no way the west wants peace in Syria, although support for Assad has grown since the start of the conflict. Rebel areas are nearly completely empty because of brutality and forced conversions.

  • Comment number 8.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this

    Comment number 7.

    It seems terribly reminiscent of the disintegration of Yugoslavia.

  • rate this

    Comment number 6.

    neill999 @ 5
    Oh please, get real - the 'outsiders' certainly aren't helping but it's clearly Syrians who are killing each other in their tens of thousands.

    DavidinUSA @ 1
    The majority of the world's 'nations' contain divided 'tribes' - the so-called 'United' Kingdom being one of them - but only occasionally do any of them resort to slaughtering each other. That is caused by appalling governance.

  • rate this

    Comment number 5.

    The majority of Syrians don't see themselves as Sunni, or Alawite or Christian or Druze. They see themselves as Syrian. It outsiders that are inflaming the situation and causing this sectarian divide.

  • rate this

    Comment number 4.

    Having lived here (Qatar) for the past 3 years and travelled extensively in the gulf, I am always pleasantly surprised by the generally very positive view and respect for England from Iranians, Iraqis, Kuwaitis, Qataris, Omanis, Bahrainis, Emiratis... So, it is sad that in the past 50 years we have ended up following USA policy, it is though we have forgotten everything we learned from history.

  • rate this

    Comment number 3.

    The problem with the middle east is the fact that are 1000 years behind the West with regards civilisation, respect for others, respect for difference. Beheading was shocking 10 years ago yet its the norm in this region. Let those who use killing tools worse than the devil on both sides to wipe each other out. It's not our fight. You can't teach a stone to move, you can't teach a savage respect

  • rate this

    Comment number 2.

    If History is any yardstick as to what happens with the tribalism described by Gertude Bell, it would be apt to point out that the Roman empire decided that the Scottish tribes could never be tamed and turned into a nation. They built a wall to keep these tribes away from civilization

    The Scottish will for tribal independence that runs to this day means that the deeper Syrian conflict has mileage

  • rate this

    Comment number 1.

    Nice article. I think the opening quotation by Gertrude Bell sums it all up - Syria is not a nation in the western sense, just a boundary on a map that contains warring tribes. That is the root cause of today's problems.


Page 2 of 2



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.