World powers welcome Lakhdar Brahimi as new UN envoy

 
Lakhdar Brahimi (June 2012) Mr Brahimi is considered to have a formidable reputation at the UN

World powers have hailed the appointment of veteran Algerian diplomat Lakhdar Brahimi as the new UN-Arab League envoy for Syria.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Washington was ready to support Mr Brahimi, and Russia said it was ready for "close interaction".

Syrian Vice-President Farouq al-Shara is quoted as welcoming the appointment.

The 78-year-old succeeds Kofi Annan who resigned this month as his peace plan had failed to achieve a real ceasefire.

Meanwhile Syrian forces have launched new air and artillery strikes on rebel-held areas, in particular in the northern city of Aleppo, the pro-rebel Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said.

Fighting was also reported in various areas of the city. Homs in central Syria and Herak and Deraa in the south were subjected to bombardment, the Observatory added.

Syria's state-run media said that government troops in Aleppo had repulsed attacks by rebel forces near the airport on Friday.

'Ceasefire need'

Mrs Clinton said Mr Brahimi "will continue the pursuit of an end to the conflict and a peaceful transition in Syria".

"My message to special envoy Brahimi is simple: The United States stands ready to support you and secure a lasting peace that upholds the legitimate aspirations for a representative government of the people of Syria," she said.

Russia said it was "ready for close interaction with the new special representative ... with the aim of overcoming the crisis in Syria".

But its Foreign Minister, Sergey Lavrov was quoted by Russian media as saying that Mr Brahimi's efforts would be ineffective without a ceasefire.

"Political dialogue will not start, at least these efforts will not lead to a final result if violence does not cease. And that does not depend on Brahimi," he said.

The European Union also offered its full support, and China promised to "co-operate positively" with Mr Brahimi.

And in Syria, itself, Mr Shara's spokesman told the BBC he had welcomed the appointment and supported Mr Brahimi's insistence on obtaining a unified position in the UN Security Council.

Abdul Salam Hijab also denied recent rumours that Mr Shara, the most senior Sunni Muslim in the Damascus regime, had defected to the opposition and left the country.

Mr Brahimi, whose appointment came a day after the UN called an end to its military observer mission, has held a long series of high-profile diplomatic posts, notably as the UN's top envoy in Afghanistan in 1996-8 and 2001-4.

Analysts say he has a formidable reputation at the UN but is also seen as independent of the major powers.

Announcing his resignation earlier this month, Mr Annan had said he was unable to fulfil his role because of the growing militarisation of the conflict, as well as deadlock in the UN Security Council.

Russia and China have vetoed resolutions on the crisis three times, citing their opposition to any action which might be seen as regime change imposed from outside.

Co-operation from the Syrians was essential in order to find a peaceful resolution, Mr Brahimi told the BBC.

But he also insisted diplomatic efforts should not be abandoned.

"I might very well fail but we sometimes are lucky and we can get a breakthrough," he said.

Activists estimate about 20,000 people have died since anti-government protests erupted against the Assad regime in March last year. Tens of thousands of people have also fled the country.

 

More on This Story

Syria's war War in Syria

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 37.

    Poor guy. If ever there was a poison chalice.....

    I hope he gets paid well while it lasts....

  • rate this
    -5

    Comment number 36.

    Brahimi is a much better bet than the ineffectual yes-man Kofi Annan, who has presided over the collapse of the UN as a meaningful player in conflicts such as this one, and has now dragged it even further into disrepute by demonstrating how useless its empty pieties are in this particular case. The 'plan' was a disaster from the start.

  • Comment number 35.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 34.

    Russia supports Syria becaue it fears loosing it's naval base, it fears loosing a friend in the middle east(Assad), it likes middle east arms sales and it is against democracy expanding globally. Russia claims to want to be part of the international community but at every decision Russia deliberately goes against the international community. Bring back Gorbachev .

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 33.

    Mr Brahimi told the BBC "I might very well fail but we sometimes are lucky and we can get a breakthrough"

    His appointment (by the UN) is a politically motivated one in order to appease China, Russia and Iran, all of which do 'not' want any regime change in Syria.

    Without China and Russia supporting the UN Security Council for any real action, he will not be unable to achieve anything.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 32.

    Each side will only seek a ceasefire when they think they have pushe as far as they can . It is very unlikely that that will happen to both at once.

  • rate this
    -5

    Comment number 31.

    This conflict has to stop NOW. If not Syrians will suffer a sectarian mess that Assad is ensuring will be his legacy, which will draw bordering countries in & then us. The problem is that Russia & China are rubbing their hands at the arms trade potential & Iran cannot risk losing such a key ally & so supports Assad. If these two powers are emboldened by a victory then God help Israel & the world.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 30.

    Some countries and some people think that regime change in Libya was no good. However the Libyan people now have the choice to choose their own government and leaders, they now do not have a dictator in charge and Libya did not have over 20,000 people killed to get these things. But some countries apparently think that supporting the killing of more than 20,000 people is the better way ???

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 29.

    Oooh be still my beating heart.

    Unimpressed. Brahmini will fail unless:

    1. He sends in UN troops who are Islamic and Arabic

    or

    2. He gets hold of the equally foul regimes of Russia and China and tell them that they are utterly responsible for the thousands of dead. They MUST follow the UN line and condemn the mass murderer Asad.

    He won't/can't do either so he is a woft before he starts

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 28.

    There should be 'Peace' on earth period. Why there isn't and hasn't been peace in my lifetime or yours just boggles the mind. For some, I'm afraid, chaos and destruction means power & profit. Sad but true.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 27.

    Waste of time appointing anyone to replace Annan.
    He was a very competent person who did his level best but there are powers out there who had decided to stick their oars in and who aren't prepared to remove them until the whole place is torn apart.

    There's only one outcome for Syria now.

    The tragic irony is that its the powers who are ripping up Syria who are hailing his arrival.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 26.

    Lakhdhar should put an end to violence in Syria. it should not become another Algeria with 75,000 to 100,000 dead. It is not too late in Syria with 16,000 dead. There should be Peace in Syria.

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 25.

    This began apparently with the torture of youngsters (who made graffiti against Assad) by the police in a town south of Damascus. One died, people retaliated and here they are today.

    Problem is Hezbollah who are involved in terror throughout the area...Lebanon, Gaza, Syria and stem from Iran. Iran, as you know, is considered a problem - nuclear. More to this than meets the eye - IMO.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 24.

    I have heard Brahimi described as skilled in the art of creating the appearance of dialogue when there is none.
    Given that nobody seems ready yet to start serious negotiation, this could be; bizarrely, a valuable ability for the near and medium future!

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 23.

    Doesn't stand a chance because Fgn Ints who Pay,Train & Arm Mercenaries have similar plans for Syria to the created chaos in Libya.Best Brahimi could accomplish is expose the Truth about what is occurring in Syria and Why, which would jeopardise further UN ambitions.
    Arming & Paying Radical Fundamental Terrorists under Al Quaeda Flag display more hate for Syria than Love for our own people.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 22.

    A thankless job where so many banana skins are placed on his path even before he officially takes over. His past experiences at crises management are of minimal help here. The conflict has reached a point of no return as the obdurate Syrian regime savagely brushes all resistance. The UN Security Council has reached a stale-mate as Russia, China doggedly support Assad. A tragic hopeless situation

  • Comment number 21.

    All this user's posts have been removed.Why?

  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 20.

    If he really does have such all round support then let's hope he can bring some sanity to all of this madness.

    His first task is to bring the religious factions together to try to bring them intio the modern age of tolerance.

    Otherwise the whole region will erupt and the whole of Europe will feel its effect.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 19.

    Mr Brahimi was choice 3 - the first two looked at it and walked away. Mr Brahimi vacillated for a few days, then took the job.

    He contributes three valuable pieces - an expectation level just above zero; a glaring flashlight at the UN Security Council; and, a patient realism saying diplomacy will eventually be required. Syria will bleed until then.

  • rate this
    -7

    Comment number 18.

    Journalists bouncing around in conflict zones in their flack jackets - yet no interviews with real Syrian people. No, because they are fleeing the anarchy, death and destruction created by so-called freedom fighters who use them as human shields.

    The same view applies to Syrian government too. Why is this civil war in Syria happening, who started it and to what purpose? Does anyone know anymore?

 

Page 2 of 3

 

More Middle East stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.