Russia accuses West of 'immoral' stance on Syria
Deserters have formed the Free Syrian Army, targeting regular troops
Russia's foreign minister has accused the West of an "immoral" stance on Syria, saying it should condemn the opposition as well as security forces.
Sergei Lavrov said opposition groups were trying to provoke a "humanitarian catastrophe" to get foreign help.
The comments came after UN human rights chief Navi Pillay told the Security Council Syria should be referred to the International Criminal Court over its crackdown on the nine-month uprising.
She said 5,000 people had been killed.
In October, Russia and China vetoed a Security Council resolution condemning Syria. The draft, introduced by France and the UK, was supported by other Western countries.
On Tuesday Mr Lavrov defended an alternative text drafted by Russia and China which urges both sides in the conflict to refrain from violence.
He described as "immoral" the position of "those who refuse to exert pressure on the armed, extremist, part of the opposition and at the same time accuse us of blocking the work of the Security Council".
Mr Lavrov said opposition forces in Homs had attacked hospitals and schools.
He added: "To me it is clear that the purpose is to provoke a humanitarian catastrophe, to get a pretext to demand external interference into this conflict."
Russia has accused Western countries of using the UN to try to force regime change in Syria.
Navi Pillay on Syria crackdown: "Five-thousand killed, including 300 children."
Meanwhile, clashes between Syrian security forces and army defectors appear to be intensifying in the north of the country.
Syrian activists on Tuesday said deserters had killed seven soldiers in an ambush in Idlib province.
The UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights told the BBC the attack had been in revenge for the killing of 11 civilians by government forces earlier in the day.
In New York, UN Human Rights Commissioner Navi Pillay told a closed session of the Security Council that 300 children had been among those killed since the start of the uprising in March.
She also said 14,000 people were believed to have been arrested, and 12,400 had fled to neighbouring countries.
"It is based on the evidence and the widespread and systematic nature of the killings, the detentions and the acts of torture that I felt that these acts constituted crimes against humanity and I recommended that there should be a referral to the International Criminal Court," Ms Pillay said on Monday.
She said her estimate of more than 5,000 deaths did not include security forces. The Syrian government has said more than 1,000 of its police and troops have been killed.
The Syrian ambassador at the UN, Bashar Jaafari, said Ms Pillay had "allowed herself to be misused in misleading the public opinion by providing information based on allegations collected from 233 defectors".
It is difficult to confirm the casualty toll in Syria because there are no independent monitors on the ground and international journalists have been denied access to the country.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~54~RS~)

Behind the battle lines
Refugee numbers 'highest since 1994'
US Taliban move prompts Afghan ire
Jumpstarting Motor City
Baby on board
Warning from history
Coming out in Yemen
Transport in transit
Fast Track
Comment number 36.
Hiba_K13th December 2011 - 14:24
I think many Syrians would agree with the statement made by Sergei Lavrov; the West cannot have it both ways.. On one hand, it supports an armed uprising that the majority of Syrians do not approve of, and on the other, it calls for a “humanitarian intervention” that would pave the way for a full scale military intervention!
Link to this (Comment number 36)
Comment number 33.
Athame5713th December 2011 - 14:12
In any conflict there will be crimes on both sides, you can't control everybody all the time. I want to know why we were so willing to help in Libya but not in Syria!
Link to this (Comment number 33)
Comment number 27.
rupertrogue13th December 2011 - 13:59
Of course, as in Lybia, the only way to overthrow a dictatorship may be by force. Mr Lavrov is in effect saying that all oppressive dictatorships should be tolerated for ever unless they can be peacefully overthrown. That suites the usual (and historic) Russian autocratic way of thinking, but it is not acceptable to the peoples of the worlds oppressed countries.
Link to this (Comment number 27)
Comment number 14.
Poddy10013th December 2011 - 13:36
Russia making sense. Both sides are guilty, but seems our governments always side with the eventual winner
Link to this (Comment number 14)
Comment number 11.
Lightworx13th December 2011 - 13:22
As stated, it is all about money. The west are focused on one point of view and one point of view only...the one that suits them and their position. Of course there are two sides to every story and once both sides have been heard, only then can you make your opinion. It is just sad that the majority of people in the "free" world only get to hear one side....
Link to this (Comment number 11)
Comments 5 of 6