Israel offers talks with Palestinians over UN bid
Mr Netanyahu said Mr Abbas should not "waste time on unilateral moves"
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has offered to hold direct talks with Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas at the UN General Assembly.
Mr Abbas earlier said he was willing to meet Mr Netanyahu but was determined to push ahead with a bid for UN recognition of a Palestinian state.
The US and Israel oppose the bid and there has been intense diplomacy to avert a crisis over the move.
Peace talks between the Palestinians and Israel broke down a year ago.
The Palestinians are seeking international recognition of their state based on the borders that existed in 1967. This would give the Palestinians the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip.
Israel and the US say a Palestinian state can only be achieved through direct negotiation, but the Palestinian leadership says this approach has got them nowhere.
Mr Abbas has said he will launch the process on Friday, when he submits a written request to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon after his address to the General Assembly.
If approved by Mr Ban, the Security Council then examines the request and votes on it. In order to pass, the request must get the votes of nine out of 15 council members, with no vetoes from the permanent members. The US has said it will use its veto.
In this case, Mr Abbas could ask for a vote of the General Assembly for enhanced observer status.
Symbolic valueMr Netanyahu called on Mr Abbas - the President of the Palestinian Authority (PA) - to begin negotiations with Israel instead of "wasting time on unilateral moves".
He said: "I call on the PA chair to open direct negotiations in New York, that will continue in Jerusalem and Ramallah."
Analysts say the call is an attempt to stop Mr Abbas from launching his UN membership request.
Palestinian UN Statehood Bid
- Palestinians currently have permanent observer entity status at the UN
- They are represented by the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO)
- Officials now want an upgrade so a state of Palestine has full member status at the UN
- They seek recognition on 1967 borders - in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and Gaza
- Enhanced observer member status could be an interim option
While UN recognition would have largely symbolic value, the Palestinians argue that it would strengthen their hands in peace talks with Israel, especially on the final status issues that divide them.
These are the precise location of the border, the status of Jerusalem, the right of return of Palestinian refugees, water, and security.
Speaking on his way to New York, Mr Abbas said he was under "tremendous pressure" to drop his bid.
Diplomats have been meeting in New York after days of shuttle diplomacy in the Middle East to look for a compromise.
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said there was still time to reach one. But she said the "only way to a two-state solution... is through negotiations.
"No matter what does or doesn't happen this week, it will not produce the kind of result that everyone is hoping for," she said.
Representatives from the European Union, the UN, the US and Russia - the Quartet of Middle East mediators - are reported to be working on a framework for a return to talks that would forestall Mr Abbas' statehood bid.
The Jerusalem Post said this would have Israel agreeing "with reservations" to enter talks on the basis of the 1967 borders with mutual land swaps while the Palestinians would agree to the mention of Israel as the nation state of the Jewish people.
Israeli isolationA BBC/GlobeScan poll suggests that in 19 countries across the world, more people back UN recognition of Palestine as an independent state than oppose it.
The Palestinian move at the UN comes as Israel is increasingly isolated in the Middle East.
Relations with Egypt, Turkey and Jordan have soured in recent months.
Mrs Clinton met Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu in New York and made it clear to him that this was not the time for more tension and volatility in the region.
Turkey and Israel, once close partners, have fallen out since Israeli security forces raided a Turkish aid flotilla trying to reach Gaza last year, killing nine Turkish citizens.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~38~RS~)

Frank words from Obama in Israel
Refugee numbers 'highest since 1994'
Attack follows news of Afghan talks
Jumpstarting Motor City
Baby on board
Warning from history
Coming out in Yemen
Transport in transit
Fast Track
Comment number 80.
HNS20th September 2011 - 15:07
The Palestinians and Jews have obviously had ample time, 65 years or more, to sort out their differences. Evidently they haven't done that yet! Mr Netanyahu should know that there is absolutely no point in returning to negotiations if Israel does not fully commit itself to them. Both Israel and its US allies should also be completely impartial and unbiased for the negotiations to be successfull.
Link to this (Comment number 80)
Comment number 71.
AdnanAlam20th September 2011 - 14:39
Atlast we will definitely see a real progress in this issue. Atleast the positions of various states on this issue will come out. The people of Palestine definitely need some humane treatment by the responsible leaders of the world. They should help build a consensus so as to develop the area and also find a permanent solution of this crisis which is coming from the World War II era.
Link to this (Comment number 71)
Comment number 63.
Wm Bainbridge20th September 2011 - 14:24
Are the Israelis going to offer the Palestinians East Jerusalem as a capital? No. Are the Palestinians going to agree to anything without East Jerusalem as their capital? No. Could either government actually deliver on a concession on this issue? No. Can the West offer the Palestinians anything besides money to go away and keep quiet? No. It's like a bad TV show that never gets canceled.
Link to this (Comment number 63)
Comment number 36.
Sempfi20th September 2011 - 13:07
This issue again...not sure there is a permanent solution to this. As soon as you get a two state solution with Jews on one side and Palestinians on the other, all you have is two countries that are likely to go to war. But if we could get there at least it is a start. The bigger picture needs to be kept in mind at all times though, I am sick of listening to narrowminded people regarding this.
Link to this (Comment number 36)
Comment number 35.
yaacovarieh20th September 2011 - 13:06
In 1948 the UN partitioned Palestine to create the modern state of Israel and a Palestinian state, it's time to make it a reality.
That is correct and the Arabs rejected it .
Nothing has changed and they still want Israel to disappear.
Link to this (Comment number 35)
Comments 5 of 6