Uruguay overturns amnesty for military-era crimes

Uruguay's Chamber of Deputies during the debate on 27 October Deputies exchanged heated arguments for 12 hours

Related Stories

Uruguay's Congress has voted to revoke an amnesty law that protected officers from prosecution for crimes committed during military rule from 1975 to 1983.

After hours of intense debate, deputies backed the measure which now goes to President Jose Mujica, himself a former left-wing militant, for approval.

Opponents say the decision undermines the will of the Uruguayan people who twice voted to keep the amnesty.

An estimated 7,000 political prisoners were held and many were tortured.

In an sign of the divisive nature of the proposal, Uruguay's Chamber of Deputies debated for 12 hours whether the amnesty in force since 1985 should be overturned.

Finally, 50 out of 90 deputies voted to scrap the law, following a similar move by the Senate on Tuesday.

Those in favour of ending the amnesty say it will help Uruguay to comply with a ruling by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights to investigate alleged crimes from the era of military rule.

The amnesty law has been ruled unconstitutional by Uruguay's Supreme Court, but until now survived numerous challenges, including an attempt in Congress in May to annul it.

It was put to the vote in 1989 and then in 2009, and on both occasions there was not enough support to overturn it.

President Jose Mujica on 23 October President Mujica had initially argued against scrapping the amnesty

Supporters of the amnesty say Congress has ignored the electorate's wishes.

Ahead of the vote, members of the armed forces said they would seek prosecution of former Tupamaro guerrillas if the amnesty were revoked.

Under the amnesty law, the president could decide whether investigations into cases of alleged abuses should be allowed to proceed.

During the presidencies that followed military rule, many cases were blocked.

Current President Jose Mujica, a former Tupamaro leader who was jailed during military rule, previously argued against scrapping the amnesty, pointing to the referendum results.

But he has since indicated that he will sign the measure revoking the amnesty before 1 November, after which the time limit for trying military-era human rights would have expired.

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

More Latin America & Caribbean stories

RSS

Features

  • Alana Saarinen at pianoMum, Dad and Mum

    The girl with three biological parents


  • Polish and British flags alongside British roadsideWar debt

    Does the UK still feel a sense of obligation towards Poles?


  • Islamic State fighters parade in Raqqa, Syria (30 June 2014)Who backs IS?

    Where Islamic State finds support to become a formidable force


  • Bride and groom-to-be photographed underwaterWetted bliss

    Chinese couples told to smile, but please hold your breath


  • A ship is dismantled for scrap in the port city of Chittagong, BangladeshDangerous work

    Bangladesh's ship breakers face economic challenge


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.