The EU's curious choice of Juncker for president

File photo: Jean-Claude Juncker, 25 May 2014 Mr Juncker says he is open to listening to British concerns

It will be a curious nomination. Almost certainly this week the EU's heads of government will nominate the centre-right politician Jean-Claude Juncker to be the most powerful official in the EU.

Why curious? Because very few officials or heads of government believe he is the best man to lead the EU at a moment of growing disenchantment with the European project.

He is the classic Brussels insider, with an encyclopaedic knowledge of Europe's rules; a man who prefers the secret, early-hours deal-making to the role of open persuader; a man deeply committed to further European integration.

So a typical conversation - which I have had many times over the past week - goes like this: "Do you think Mr Juncker is the right face for the EU at this time?"

Answer: "We're not interested in faces or personalities, it is the agenda that counts." So the question is neatly side-stepped.

Private misgivings

It is very difficult to find anyone who can explain why Mr Juncker is the best candidate to lead the EU in a fresh direction.

From various conversations it seems that several heads of government are likely to back him at a summit later this week while not believing in him.

File photo: From left, Alexis Tsipras from Greece, Denmark's Ska Keller, Germany's Martin Schulz, Luxembourg's Jean-Claude Juncker, and Belgium's Guy Verhofstadt hold a televised debate as the 5 candidates campaigning to be next President of the European Commission at the European Parliament in Brussels, 15 May 2014 Mr Juncker (second from right) was the lead candidate of the centre-right European People's Party grouping

In Brussels, Downing Street is judged to have made miscalculations but part of the reason behind David Cameron's stubborn opposition to Jean-Claude Juncker is his frustration with the difference between what some other leaders have expressed to him in private and their public statements.

Start Quote

How many people do you think actually cast their votes with Mr Juncker in mind?”

End Quote

The German Chancellor Angela Merkel is a doubter herself. In the immediate aftermath of the European elections she suggested a "broad tableau" of candidates should be considered.

It was only later after scorching criticism in the German press that she had told voters that their vote would determine the next Commission President that she firmly lined up for Mr Juncker. As I have said in a previous blog, German commentators urged her to choose between Britain and democracy.

A further curiosity is Mr Juncker's own commitment to this high-profile post.

Some of those close to him describe "a wobble" when he appeared to doubt his desire for the EU Presidency before digging in, apparently affronted at the criticism.

So how does one explain why so many leaders - including doubters - are lining up behind him?

Firstly, he was the centre-right's candidate.

File photo: Angela Merkel, 20 June 2014 Angela Merkel was criticised in the German press when she did not express support for Mr Juncker

Many conservative leaders genuinely believe it would be a denial of democracy to have sold him to the electorate and then to drop him. It has little to do with Mr Juncker.

"You can't run a campaign with TV debates and act as if it never happened," said one minister.

Even so there are misgivings. Amongst some of those who campaigned for Parliament's candidates to lead the Commission there are admissions the process was flawed.

They shy away from answering the question "how many people do you think actually cast their votes with Mr Juncker in mind?"

The 'Italian approach'

On the centre-left there are two reasons for falling in behind Mr Juncker.

Firstly, politicians like Martin Schulz (who was the candidate of the Socialists) see this as part of a wider struggle to boost the influence of the European Parliament.

If Juncker becomes President of the EU Commission it will represent a power shift away from national governments.

Secondly, there is what I might call the Italian approach. And that is to bargain. To trade support for concessions.

The Italians have been smart; their priority is winning flexibility over budget rules and targets for reducing the deficit.

They want the next five years to be about growth rather than continuing austerity. They believe they have already got support for a more flexible interpretation of the rules.

Flags of European Union member states fly in front of the European Parliament building in Strasbourg, 15 April  2014 Mr Juncker's supporters want to boost the influence of the European Parliament

Their strategy appears to be to back Mr Juncker now before the start of the Italian Presidency in July. With the top job settled they believe they will be more able to bang the drum for measures to promote growth and jobs.

Start Quote

In the end politics in Europe is rooted in compromise. It is how Brussels works”

End Quote

Now there are many Brussels voices who argue that David Cameron should have played a similar game: don't focus on the man but try and bind him to a reform agenda. That is what Angela Merkel has been telling the British prime minister.

In London there are deep-seated doubts about what kind of reforms Mr Juncker might back.

Before the election in May he answered some of my questions. He said "I am open to listening to British concerns... I am ready to engage in a dialogue with David Cameron to negotiate a fair deal with Britain."

He also said: "Ever closer union can mean different things for different states."

But the detail is elusive and those close to him are briefing that he would be resistant to weakening the current rules on freedom of movement.

'Back-room deal'

It is often said in Brussels that David Cameron has made misjudgements.

Clearly Angela Merkel did not like the hint of a threat that the election of Mr Juncker would make it harder to keep Britain in the EU.

It did not help that the Conservatives' parliamentary group accepted MEPs from the German euro-sceptic party.

But when Downing Street warns of "handing power to the European Parliament through a back-room deal" it taps into a concern shared by a number of countries.

File photo: British Prime Minister David Cameron, left, greets Italy's Prime Minister Matteo Renzi before their meeting at 10 Downing Street in London, 1 April 2014 Some argue that David Cameron (left) should have taken an approach similar to Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi's

In the end politics in Europe is rooted in compromise. It is how Brussels works.

Whatever their private misgivings very few leaders are prepared to risk an institutional showdown with the European Parliament which has to vote on their nomination.

David Cameron wants to put the other leaders on the spot by insisting on a vote and so putting on the record why they support Jean-Claude Juncker in Europe's hour of need.

The heads of government later this week will have to decide on one man. No other names are on the table.

In the end Mr Juncker's likely victory is not because he is seen as the outstanding candidate to take Europe forward but because he helps forge a consensus.

Gavin Hewitt Article written by Gavin Hewitt Gavin Hewitt Europe editor

Greek crisis deepens amid EU tensions

As time pressures mount, a deal to settle the Greek bailout crisis still hangs in the balance.

Read full article

More on This Story

EU Decides


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 288.

    #285 Chris

    "Not a game for the faint hearted as there is a sense that the bureaucrats will not get it all their own way!"

    I don´t see this as bureaucrats Vs others. I see with the UK it is the Feudal ´Oath´ Vs a democratic Europe.

    No matter how this ends, Germany is in a win-win situation. UK stupidity has put Germany in a situation it never wanted --and has won no friends by doing so.

  • rate this

    Comment number 287.

    #284 Chris

    What do you mean by ´holistic approach´?

    But now ?

    Little functions as it should --and the taxes for nothing (little) in return.

    The massive debt for banking failures and military Hubris are luxuries that Britain could never afford --if the intention was ever to raise living standards --to equal the false pride.

  • rate this

    Comment number 286.

    "... to have sold him to the electorate and then to drop him. .."

    Where did he appear anywhere on the ballot paper?

    I did not see a vote for Commission President.

    Nor did any of the party choices state 'X is our candidate or commission president'

    STOP with this nonsense that democracy is being overturned because there is and never had been any democracy in this process.

  • rate this

    Comment number 285.


    In Brussels tonight there are many who are concerned about the ramifications about who they vote for. The populous for once are starting to get their voice herd...
    Just back from France where the nerves are obvious for all to see. Not a game for the faint hearted as there is a sense that the bureaucrats will not get it all their own way!

    Interesting times ahead...

  • rate this

    Comment number 284.

    "margret new Ireland"

    Well I live in Ireland so perhaps I should have a better insight.

    As for your posting re the UK's balance of trade they do not tell the whole picture. As referred to previously one should take an holistic approach, Yes they had poor conditions through the end of the 50's up until the early 80's due to industrial relations. But now!!!!


Comments 5 of 288



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.