Battle lines drawn over new airport for Nantes

 
Demonstrators hold a banner saying "Airport, Stop" at a demonstration on Saturday Clashes between police and demonstrators over the proposed new airport at Nantes have become violent

Related Stories

In the fields and woods of southern Brittany, protesters are waging a protracted, dirty and occasionally violent campaign to halt France's latest "grand projet" - a new airport for the west of the country.

For months activists have been living rough in cabins and treehouses in the countryside 10 miles (16km) north of Nantes, occupying part of the area designated for the Aeroport du Grand Ouest, in the commune of Notre-Dame-des-Landes.

A combination of political greens and reds, they say the airport is costly, unnecessary and will do serious damage to the environment.

Far better, they argue, to keep the fields for their original purpose: grazing cows.

But the Socialist government, backed by the Socialist region and the Socialist-run city of Nantes, is determined to press on.

Anti- Nantes-airport protesters Protesters say they want Nantes to remain as it is

In recent weeks things have come to a head. With the legal process finally exhausted, police have used force to clear out protesters so that the initial phase of work can begin.

On 17 November, a mass demonstration at Notre-Dames-des-Landes by some 20,000 opponents of the airport provided cover for activists to reoccupy the site and start rebuilding their huts.

But now, riot police have moved back in, and there were clashes over this past weekend. Tear gas and rubber bullets were fired and several police officers and protesters were injured.

'Ayraultport'

With the story getting front-page treatment in the press, Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault is under pressure to explain how - at a time of growing environmental concerns and dwindling financial resources - building a 550m euro (£445m) airport in a city that already has one is the right course of action.

As a former mayor of Nantes, Mr Ayrault is one of the airport's most vociferous supporters. Protesters have dubbed it the "Ayraultport" in his honour.

But he presides over a coalition government whose other main participant - the Green Party - opposes the scheme.

To defuse the tension, Mr Ayrault announced over the weekend a moratorium on work at the site. A "dialogue commission" is to be created so that opponents can once again express their concerns.

But the government remains adamant: the airport will go ahead.

A riot policeman confronts a masked protester at the proposed site of the new airport on Saturday Police are again trying to evict protesters from the site of the proposed airport

A farming village of 200 inhabitants, Notre-Dame-des-Landes was selected as a possible site for an airport as long ago as the 1970s.

Back then, the idea was for a new international hub that would draw traffic away from the two Paris airports. The supersonic airliner, Concorde, would have used it.

But over the years the project changed in focus. When it was finally given the go-ahead in 2008, the aim was to provide a new communications centre for France's fastest-growing region.

"The population of western France is getting bigger and bigger, with people moving in for jobs or for the sun. These people need direct routes by air to cities in other parts of Europe," says Nicolas Notebaert, chairman of the contractor, Vinci Airports.

Nantes has an existing airport - Nantes-Atlantique - but according to Mr Notebaert, it will soon be unable to cope with the projected growth in traffic.

"What the people of the Nantes region need is a lot of small planes heading to a lot of different destinations. That means many more plane positions and more terminals than the current airport can handle," he says.

Start Quote

Francoise Verchere

In 25 years as a local elected official, I never once had a complaint about noise”

End Quote Francoise Verchere Left Party

Mr Notebaert's figures are hotly disputed by opponents of Notre-Dame-des-Landes, who argue that with proper investment the existing airport could be sufficiently enlarged.

Opponents also question other arguments put forward by Vinci and the government: for example that the current airport presents a noise and safety hazard for the people of Nantes, because most aircraft that land there have to overfly the city.

"In 25 years as a local elected official, I never once had a complaint about noise," says Francoise Verchere of the Left Party.

As for the claim that the new airport will bring jobs and growth, campaigners say that after the construction phase the impact will be minimal - with many jobs simply being transferred from the existing airport.

Vanity project

Rather, argues Genevieve Lebouteur of the local Green Party, proponents are acting for the worst of motives: "What we think is that the airport is a vanity project for politicians like Jean-Marc Ayrault, who want to end their careers with a ribbon-cutting ceremony at some major regional installation."

"That and the fact that once a project like this starts rolling, no-one has the guts to stop it."

According to Mr Notebaert, Vinci's plans for the new airport will make it one of the "greenest" in the world - with energy per passenger one third of the level at the existing airport.

A riot police officer sprays tear gas at a protester up a tree The Green Party says police are using "military-style force"

But environmentalists say the whole notion of a "green" airport is laughable. They say that its construction will endanger rare animals like the crested newt, which lives in the wetlands designated to be drained and concreted over.

And they believe the "growth-at-all-costs" vision of the world is outmoded and dangerous.

"I don't want Nantes to be some European megalopolis. I just want Nantes to stay as it is," said Natalie, a young demonstrator at the site.

With the airport protests becoming of national interest, Green Party leaders are going through contortions to justify staying part of the coalition.

Jean-Vincent Place, who heads the Greens in the Senate, points out that in their pre-election agreement with the Socialists, the airport issue was left to one side.

"But it has been very difficult these last few weeks, especially seeing the military-style use of force being taken against the campaigners," he says.

For the constructors Vinci, Mr Notebaert says democracy is at stake.

"The police are not using excessive force. They are simply acting to ensure that the law is respected, and that work can commence."

"Our agents on the ground are the ones who are afraid - of the protesters," he says.

"Nothing has been done secretly. At every election locally, regionally and nationally, the plan was on the table. The voters chose parties who supported the airport. So it must go ahead."

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 12.

    @11, being from NY, I don't see much coverage of local protests in England unless it makes BBC World. And who said anything about 'high speed'? Everyone is in too much of a hurry. With countries as small as you've got, you don't need 100mph trains to get to the other end in reasonable time.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 11.

    #10 You maybe haven't noticed the mass opposition to the proposed High Speed rail lines in England. Funnily enough noise, cost & loss of agricultural land is exactly what those protesters claim too.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 10.

    Just say 'non', France does not need more airports to reach Europe, the only function for an airport is transcontenental travel. Intra-contentental travel should be by train.

    @9 - politicians frequently act against the wishes and interests of their constituencies, as they need only be the least of all evils on most issues to win. If it were a single issue vote, the airport would lose.

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 9.

    #8 if this airport is so unpopular please explain why the parties backing it won the local election while those opposed to it lost. Rather than these protestors somehow being 'democracy in action' they're actually the exact opposite.

    As to 'so what'. My colleague would like to fly to her home town rather than a town 2 hours away. Not unreasonable

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 8.

    @6 "an awkward place to get from the uk.."

    So what!
    As has already mentioned, there are plenty of underused airports here in France as it is, why build another white elephant?

    @7 Who's paying??? The politicians aren't saying, but somebody is going to get rich if it goes ahead, and it won't be the residents of Nante!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 7.

    Aren't people hurting enough under various austerity programs, unemployment, etc. Must they now put up with noise and traffic that they do not want.
    When in doubt, appoint a Commission. That will kick the can down the road for at least a couple of years.
    By the way, who is paying for this airport?

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 6.

    #5 I've got a colleague from Nantes who wants it. Its quite an awkward place to get to from the UK.

    In the UK especially it would seem 'the people' (ie a couple of hundred of them who shout loudly) object to ALL new developments yet expect to have electricity coming out of the sockets while objecting to any new power stations being built.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 5.

    There's no need for it, the people don't want it, and there's no money to pay for it.
    When are governments going to start listening to the people they represent?
    Instead of feathering their own nests with large financial deals with their unelected buddies and greedy banksters.

    Let the people decide.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 4.

    When governments start listening to the people of their respective countries and doing what's right and in the best interest's of their people instead of using the 'steamroller' approach, they may have less protests.
    Good for the French people for standing up for what they believe is right. More of it here please

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 3.

    I don't know the rights or wrongs of this project, but the idea of retaining it for cows grazing? depending on how many cows, they could end up producing more greenhouse gases than the aircraft! Plus the slaughter of these animals is bound to upset animal rights campagners.
    Surely this just proves the old saying "You can please some of the people some of the time!"
    vds@2 seems a reasonable view!

  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 2.

    This airport is essential. I live in Western France and we have serious need for an airport with adequate capacity. It may be that Brest, Rennes, Dinard and Lorient are all within two hours of Nantes - and that is exactly why Nantes should be the location - it is central and accessible from all of those places. Those other locations are all on the periphery and totally unsuitable. Classic nimbyism

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 1.

    No to the new airport at Nantes, I live in Western France we already have numerous airports operating at reduced capacity eg Brest, Rennes, Dinard, Lorient all within 2 hrs of Nantes. Why not get the airlines together to decide who flies where and fully utilise the exisiting runway space. We have good raillinks from and to each of these towns. no sense in ripping up our beautiful countryside.

 

Page 3 of 3

 

More Europe stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.