Future of Europe debate heats up
Occasionally, in the midst of firefighting, Europe's leaders get to reflect. A town hall meeting in Berlin, organised by the Nicolas Berggruen Institute on Governance, provided one of those opportunities to debate where Europe was heading. Some kind of political union was the answer.
There was wide acceptance that Europe needed a new narrative; it could not just sell itself on being a union for peace. Although the direction of travel is clearly towards greater integration, Europe is becoming a union with different tiers.
What was interesting was just how quickly the spotlight fell on the UK. The President of the European Parliament, Martin Schulz, complained about Britain's "pick and mix" approach, cherry-picking what it chose to be involved with. "That," said Mr Schulz, "would unleash enormous problems".
The French Finance Minister, Pierre Moscovici, said Britain's membership "is a rather strange make-up". Soon after they joined the EU, he said, they wanted a renegotiation and a rebate. The UK has always been a bit of a special case, he said. To the question "can we still live together?" he said "yes we can".
The German Finance Minister, Wolfgang Schaeuble, said "it goes without saying that is is better if the UK assumes greater responsibility within the EU". Mr Schaeuble said the English-speaking people was "not sufficient any longer to give the UK a great role in the world".
What was repeatedly emphasised was an unwillingness to allow Britain to obstruct and stand in the way of where others wanted to go. The UK is being served notice it cannot slow down the project. If that happens it will lead to real tension.
The belief of most of those taking part was that the nation state had reached its limit, that globalisation made necessary closer integration. The former Belgian Prime Minister, Guy Verhofstadt, said "sovereignty in the future cannot be defended on the national level but only on a European level".
Mr Schaeuble argued that only through European integration could countries retain any autonomy in a globalised world. The difficulty they face - and it was acknowledged here - is the continuing attachment to the nation state.
Much as Europe discusses its Great Leap Forward it tells you something when the financier George Soros tells the conference that he is setting up a string of "solidarity houses" in Greece to protect migrants from neo-Nazi hooligans and to provide emergency food for the poor. A reminder of how the eurozone crisis has created a new division in Europe between the creditor and debtor nations.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~45~RS~)




Syria town under heavy army shelling
Foot loose
Life span
Tweets of the week
African anthems
Working Lives Ecuador
Click
Comment number 387.
quietoaktree31st October 2012 - 23:27
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Link to this (Comment number 387)
Comment number 386.
quietoaktree31st October 2012 - 23:00
The counter attack is already being planned --with unlikely allies.
-- The remnants of British industry and the Unions. Foreign companies are planning their escape onto the ´Mainland´.
-- Gulp ! Gulp!
Link to this (Comment number 386)
Comment number 385.
quietoaktree31st October 2012 - 22:50
#383 kane
-- and you will go with him ?
When Kennedy was assassinated his wife was asked if she wanted to change her blood stained clothes -- she refused saying --"Let them see what they have done"
-- We are all watching !
-- May I have another --this time a double ´Britain on the rocks´, with more ice, please.
Link to this (Comment number 385)
Comment number 384.
kane31st October 2012 - 22:43
382.
quietoaktree
3 Minutes ago
"-- May I have a ´Britain on the rocks´, please ?"
Instead of a country with falling unemployment, inflation, and rising confidence, and with the 2nd highest living standard in the EU?
The people know best, Europe is not worth a carrot, never has been and never will be.
Link to this (Comment number 384)
Comment number 383.
kane31st October 2012 - 22:32
381.
quietoaktree
There is no treachery. MPs are doing what they consider to be in their constituents interests. If Cameron can't make good on his promise of a referendum, then he should go.
Link to this (Comment number 383)
Comments 5 of 387