Viewpoints: Experts comment on EU's Nobel award


Related Stories

The 2012 Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded to the European Union for its work in promoting peace and stability in Europe. The award recognised the success of Franco-German reconciliation, the EU's eastward enlargement and peace efforts in the Balkans.

Here several experts on European affairs give their opinions on the award, which comes at a time of tension amid the eurozone debt crisis.

Start Quote

Heather Grabbe

The EU needs to get back to its core business - trade and promoting reconciliation”

End Quote
Heather Grabbe, Open Society Institute, Brussels

This is a big confidence boost for the EU at a moment when confidence is at a very low ebb because of the euro crisis. It's an important reminder that European integration is a peace project.

In the Balkans reconciliation is all under the EU's auspices - were it not for the EU they wouldn't be where they are today. The EU is the only body able to bring a whole range of peace-building measures to such a troubled region - the US couldn't do that.

France and Germany no longer go to war to resolve economic difficulties. In previous centuries they did, but now they negotiate through the European Council - much better.

Reconciliation is about exorcising the ghosts of history. It's easy to forget that now, we take peace for granted.

Nato is a different thing, it's a military alliance and doesn't do institution-building.

Heather Grabbe

  • Senior aide to EU Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn in 2004-9
  • Now director of Brussels office of Open Society Institute, writes widely on European affairs

There are still huge challenges - ensuring reconciliation and co-operation in the Balkans, having a much more constructive, integrated relationship with Turkey. In the EU's neighbourhood there are still major problems with democracy, incomplete transitions and economic nationalism.

The EU needs to get back to its core business - trade and promoting reconciliation. It's important to move out of this crisis mode.

Franco-German relations have had ups and downs - at the moment they're not as close as they used to be on economic policy, or the EU's future. But the populations are much closer now, there are many school exchanges and their trade is huge.

Start Quote

Carl Bildt

The progress made through integration in the past few decades is mind-bogglingly successful”

End Quote
Carl Bildt, Swedish Foreign Minister

I think the award was highly deserved and I think we should congratulate 500 million Europeans who, in different ways, have all benefited from the integration, the stability, peace and also the prosperity that the European Union has given.

We have not sorted out all of the problems, history has not come to its end, but great progress has been made.

I think it was particularly important that the Nobel committee mentioned enlargement. They mentioned Turkey where we see, most concretely, how the integration process is making its contribution to peace.

In Greece, Portugal and Spain, we should not forget the important role the EU played in stabilising democracy after the fall of the military dictatorships, as well as the hand it is now giving them with some significant economic problems.

The progress that has been made through integration in the past few decades is mind-bogglingly successful.

Carl Bildt

  • Swedish foreign minister and former high representative for Bosnia-Hercegovina
  • Special EU peace envoy to former Yugoslavia in 1995

I am in the north of Europe, looking out at the Baltic states. Just a couple of decades ago, a hundred million people in the eastern and central parts of Europe were living under dictatorship and in despair.

The contribution that European integration has made there to the rule of law, democracy and an element of prosperity is easily forgotten.

When we are dealing with the problems of today, I think we all agree that it would be far more difficult to deal with them without the integration, the co-operation, the leaders sitting around a table and trying to find common solutions.

Carl Bildt can be followed on Twitter

Start Quote

Nigel Farage

Far from making the peoples of Europe love each other, the eurozone has divided Europe north to south ”

End Quote
Nigel Farage, UK Independence Party

I think that the whole thing is a nonsense.

If anyone is suggesting that a democratic, stable, post-war Germany would have invaded France again with the intention of smashing it to smithereens, I would suggest they are misreading history.

I do not believe there was any prospect of war happening in Western Europe after 1945. Arguably, projects that take different nation states, force them together under a new identity, a new flag and a new anthem, doing so without the consent of the peoples - such projects can actually create war, as Yugoslavia has shown us.

This prize baffles me because only recently we saw Angela Merkel going to Athens and there we saw swastikas being flown and Europe now being dominated by grief, violence and division.

Nigel Farage

  • MEP since 1999, and leader of the UK Independence Party
  • Holds eurosceptic views

The Cold War was about Nato and the nuclear deterrent. The fact the Russians did not invade us had absolutely nothing to do with the EU which, after all, was not fully created until 1992.

The EU today is about the destruction of nation-state democracy. Far from making the peoples of Europe love each other, the eurozone has divided Europe north to south and there are increasing enmities, violence in the streets.

We are headed, I think, in a very dangerous direction. Just look at the lessons of the Balkans. Look at this crackpot idea that we had in 1920 of abolishing individual nations and putting them together under a Yugoslav flag. It led to disaster and the EU, sadly, is making the same tragic mistake.

Nigel Farage can be followed on Twitter

Start Quote

Mats Persson

The irony is that the euro, because it was premature, risks driving some countries further apart”

End Quote
Mats Persson, Open Europe think tank

It's good for the EU to have a bit of encouragement. But at the same time some people would consider it a bit strange that the EU gets this award at a time when the euro crisis is causing social unrest in some parts of Europe.

The first people to be part of the big epic moments in European reconciliation were national politicans, not so much people in European institutions.

Of course the EU has done positive things, like enlargement, extending stability in post-communist eastern Europe.

With Franco-German relations you now have an institutionalised relationship between the two countries, designed to withstand crises and changes in governments - that's positive for Europe.

But Europe is more than the Franco-German axis. The irony is that the euro, because it was premature, driven by ideology, risks driving some countries further apart. The euro is now to some extent negating the positive impact the EU has had.

Mats Persson

  • Director of London-based Open Europe think tank
  • Born in Sweden, studied in US and worked for political consultancy in Washington

In Greece, Spain and Portugal the EU used to be seen as a counterweight to flaky domestic politics, but now the euro is associated with pain and outside interference, through the EU troika and European Commission.

The EU's External Action Service (EAS) is always restricted to the lowest common denominator in Europe - it can't cut across a specific country's foreign policy interests. It has to reconcile 27 different foreign policies, so it's not a swift actor.

The EAS has a mixed record - it has done some decent things, like the Iran sanctions, and in the Balkans. But in the Bosnia war the US had to step in, and in the Arab Spring the EU was initially on the wrong side.

Turkey will be a huge issue - it'll be a big problem if it turns east rather than towards Europe.

Start Quote

Charles Grant

Many Asians wish they had strong multilateral bodies like the EU”

End Quote
Charles Grant, Centre for European Reform

The EU merits the peace prize.

Its role in history is unique and positive, and much more important than the inability of the current bunch of leaders to resolve the eurozone's travails.

One only has to travel to Asia to understand the EU's value. In South and East Asia several territorial disputes could easily erupt into war.

Many Asians wish they had strong multilateral bodies like the EU, or Nato, that make war among their members inconceivable. If European states disagree they keep holding interminable summits until they find a compromise.

Charles Grant

  • Head of Centre for European Reform
  • Previously reported on business and EU affairs for The Economist

And we should not forget that the EU's eastward enlargement has spread peace, democracy and security across much of the continent.

True, the EU allowed the Balkan wars of the 1990s to fester for too long - but it learned the lesson and developed a peacekeeping capability that has done good work in the Balkans, parts of Africa and elsewhere.

Charles Grant can be followed on Twitter

Start Quote

Ulrike Guerot

It reminds people, in these difficult hours, about what is at stake”

End Quote
Ulrike Guerot, European Council on Foreign Relations

This is very positive. It reminds us what we forget during the discussion on the eurozone crisis - that this was a peace project and a political project. And this project has transformed Europe from authoritarian dictatorship into democratic, prosperous countries.

Germany and France had very different reasons - Germany to overcome its dreadful history and France for protection from Germany - but still, they overcame a century of war through reconciliation.

More than 60 years later we are still struggling with this project - but do not forget that there has not been 60 years of peace in Europe since 1410.

When Barack Obama won the prize soon after his election there were the same sort of doubts.

Ulrike Guerot

  • Senior policy fellow and representative for Germany at ECFR think tank
  • Expert on European integration

But there is a symbolic component to the award, and also a promotional and supportive component. It means a lot of attention and debate, and it reminds people, in these difficult hours, about what is at stake, and about the historic challenge we face.

At the middle of its deepest crisis, are we going to destroy a 60-year-old project that is about the rule of law and human rights?

Ulrike Guerot can be followed onTwitter


More on This Story

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 48.

    So the EU will get the $1.2 million prize money, that should sort all their problems then !

  • rate this

    Comment number 47.

    Yes - someone is getting worried I think!

  • rate this

    Comment number 46.

    It's a nice gesture but the point of the matter is Europe is in danger of falling apart. NATO is the primary reason Europe hasn't had any major conflicts since the end of World War Two. NATO was established to prevent war, while the European Union was established to make trade, and ease economic issues. The EU for all intensive purposes is just a monetary union which is in deep financial trouble..

  • rate this

    Comment number 45.

    I think Cameron should have won a Nobel prize for all he's done so far. He hasn't been here long, but he has already done an awful lot.

  • rate this

    Comment number 44.

    The Nobel Peace prize has gone to some very strange people in the past, so I'm not surprised by this....I'm suspicious!

  • rate this

    Comment number 43.

    Perhaps Farrage should read history himself. The good relationship that is had between France and Germany now is largely agreed to be at least partially down to the EU's predecessor, the European Coal and Steel Community. The whole thing was designed to bring an end to the conflict between the two, particularly over the contested regions where the coal and steel (or war materials) production were.

  • rate this

    Comment number 42.

    It has been said so many times but I will state it again. An organisation that is bent on destroying national identities and sacrificing an unique cultural diversity for the sake of keeping up with the US, deserves no prize. An organisation that is responsible for breaking up countries, societies and bringing misery upon millions of people and causing social unrest, isn't worth a prize.

  • rate this

    Comment number 41.

    Only, Apparently E.U. have great ideals. What they did for the countries as Bulgaria, Romania, Greece, etc? The big financial interests took over the natural resources of the country and destroyed the indigenous agriculture. The local industries could not compete with the "invading" west Europeans. For them EU is oppressive and thru IMF. The Nobel Price is hypocritical or just naive.

  • rate this

    Comment number 40.

    If the EU merits the Peace Prize, what about Great Britain??

    If not for GB that OTHER Germany would have been getting all the credit, and everywhere in EU would be "under control".
    The EU have substituted another type of Control, Hence the waving of Old German flags in Greece. And it was NOT the EU that prevented another war. It was NATO with the US alliance. EU have proved unable to run a bath!

  • rate this

    Comment number 39.

    Nobel Peace Prize now hit by economic downturn and has to be devalued.

  • rate this

    Comment number 38.

    EU failings have been in Yugoslavia and the ongoing Euro crisis. But it kept the peace between western powers and was key to reintegrating central European countries from 1989 and may help heal some wounds of the Balkan wars with membership for Croatia and Serbia. Really needs a vision for Russia and the Caucuses. But overall can be proud of its achievements so far, more than 2009 winner.

  • rate this

    Comment number 37.

    @31 Eddy from Waring I would think he is probably an expert in precious metals, and also gold and silver futures and options trading since that was his business before his political career. Maybe not all that relevant to the EU debate, but it does answer your question.

  • rate this

    Comment number 36.

    The EU has accomplished much good and has facilitated peace. It is deserving of the prize. Our world's economic crises would be much worse without a united Europe. Although I am a U.S. citizen, I recognize that our policies are often contrary to what is good for Europe and other continents. The EU can temper negative U.S. influence for the good of the planet.

  • rate this

    Comment number 35.

    The EU got the peace prize for what exactly. NATO and the threat of Nuclear annihilation is what kept the peace. So far the EU has created mayhem in Greece, Portugal, Spain and riots in France.
    It impoverishes everything it touches from Fish stocks through to agricultural Policy.

  • rate this

    Comment number 34.

    As John Redwood is reporedly annoyed by this I can only view it as a good thing although I too question the validity o the EU being responsible for it.

  • rate this

    Comment number 33.

    Awards like Nobel prizes, Oscars and royal honours don't impress me anymore and neither am I automatically in awe of those who receive them. This particular award is just the sort of rubbish that reinforces my view on awards and titles.

    People and organisations who are truly great are famed for their actual achievements; gongs only impress older generations.

  • rate this

    Comment number 32.

    The E.U. democratic?? Surely the committee have got things wrong this time. To what peace are they referring? Nothing much has really changed. The guns may have been put down, that's all.

    The E.U. is just conquest by stealth and legislation.

  • rate this

    Comment number 31.


    "...So the Balkan Wars do not count in the EU's so-called 60 years of peace?..."


    Since they weren't in the EU then I'd say not.

    Incidentally, in what, exactly is Nigel Farage an "expert"?

  • rate this

    Comment number 30.

    So the Balkan Wars do not count in the EU's so-called 60 years of peace? Some people live in a Brussels dream world. And I'm uncertain about an effective rule of law in some of the peripheral states ... there's already too much self-satisfaction coming out of the EU and Brussels.

  • rate this

    Comment number 29.

    The claim that the EU prevented Germany and France from fighting another war after WW2 is bizarre.Both countries were self interested by-standers, until recently, during NATO's humanitarian interventions in Europe and globally. I suspect De- Rumpuy, Barroso, Merkel et al have been busy lobbying the Nobel Committee for this gesture of appreciation....they certainly need some,


Page 6 of 8


More Europe stories



  • Mukesh SinghNo remorse

    Delhi bus rapist says victim shouldn't have fought back

  • Aimen DeanI spied

    The founder member of al-Qaeda who worked for MI6

  • Before and after shotsPerfect body

    Just how reliable are 'before and after' photos?

  • Woman with closed eyeStrange light show

    What do you see when you close your eyes?

  • Sony WalkmanLost ideas

    What has happened to Japan's inventors?

Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.