France budget: Hollande's grim choices
President Hollande's support has slumped since he came to power in May this year, polls suggest
France is committed to reducing its deficit next year to 3%. If it backtracks it fears the markets would force up its borrowing costs, in the way they have done with Spain and Italy.
France needs to save around 30bn euros (£24bn; $37bn). Only a third of that will come from spending cuts. Taxes on the rich will raise 10% and a similar amount will come from businesses. There is the expectation that capital gains, interest and dividends will be taxed as regular income.
The 2-3,000 people who earn over 1m euros will see their income tax rise to 75%. Already some of the ambitious and well-off French people have trudged to London and Brussels in pursuit of lower taxes. The government has denounced them as unpatriotic and pretends not to care. This budget, said a government minister, would spare the middle and working class, which is where the votes lie.
This budget is a political test for President Francois Hollande. Can he reduce public spending? Which cuts will he choose to make to save 10bn euros? Mr Hollande is a president with little room to manoeuvre. His supporters in the unions are watching closely.
He came to power criticising the policy of austerity first. Growth would be the priority. His first months in office have born that out. There has been no growth for three quarters. France is stagnating. Although the goverment has increased public spending that has been offset by a decline in household spending. The consumer lacks confidence. Unemployment has risen above three million and the president's approval ratings are falling.
One major test of the government's commitment to growth is the country's labour laws. It is notoriously difficult to take on new workers and replace them. Nothing would, over time, boost growth and employment more than a radical overhaul of France's employment laws. But will the government take on its natural supporters and insist change must come?
The French goverment will move cautiously. It will have noticed that elsewhere in Europe the years of austerity are bringing protesters to the streets. On Sunday in Paris there is a demonstration against the EU fiscal pact that sets strict limits on deficits.
It is frequently said by European officials and some leaders that what the EU needs is "more Europe". What this week of budgets and protests has revealed is that what the people want is a Europe that delivers.
France does not want to be Italy. France does not want to be Spain. That is the motive behind today's French budget, according to the prime minister. The relatively new French government hates the very word "austerity", but it too will have to unveil some spending cuts.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~36~RS~)




US tornado rescue effort nears end
Striking a chord
Light relief
Under the hood
High-tech economy
A leaf from nature's book
Click
Comment number 230.
quietoaktree30th September 2012 - 0:48
dmr
http://ec.europa.eu/unitedkingdom/pdf/the_eu_for_me_web.pdf
Link to this (Comment number 230)
Comment number 229.
quietoaktree30th September 2012 - 0:36
#227 dmr
-- "I fail to see any benefit for membership,"
-- you have just been describing for hours your dissatisfaction with the UK health system -- and yet you would ´protect´ against any EU ´interference´-- ?
--your only chance remaining !
-- Sorry --can´t help --or understand your logic.
Link to this (Comment number 229)
Comment number 228.
margaret howard30th September 2012 - 0:35
227 DM
"the only interest the EU has in Britain is how much money it can milk out of us"
What arrant nonesense. Britain begged and voted to be admitted and has benefited tremendously from it. We deserted our commonwealth trade in return for access to a huge market.
When you compare life then and now you'll see how things have vastly improved for all of us.
Link to this (Comment number 228)
Comment number 227.
Dailymailreader30th September 2012 - 0:20
223, the EU has always been run for German/ French benefit and is hostile to the interests of the UK.
With different economic interests to much of Europe, the only interest the EU has in Britain is how much money it can milk out of us.
I fail to see any benefit for membership, we have a trade deficit with Europe, but benefit from trade elsewhere.
Link to this (Comment number 227)
Comment number 226.
Dailymailreader30th September 2012 - 0:10
Margaret, I stand by my claim that we would have got better treatment in the US, their much higher cancer survival rates answer for me. The UK has some of the worst in the Western world, below Poland and Slovakia. All Americans get emergency treatment.
If the NHS is better than private treatment, why do most Doctors go private? Surely they are the experts.
Link to this (Comment number 226)
Comments 5 of 230