Satellites reveal sudden Greenland ice melt
The first image shows Greenland's ice sheet on 8 July, the second, taken four days later, shows the area where ice has melted at the surface
The surface of Greenland's massive ice sheet has melted this month over an unusually large area, Nasa has said.
Scientists said the "unprecedented" melting took place over a larger area than has been detected in three decades of satellite observation.
Melting even occurred at Greenland's coldest and highest place, Summit station.
The thawed ice area jumped from 40% of the ice sheet to 97% in just four days from 8 July.
“Start Quote
End Quote Lora Koenig Nasa Goddard Space Flight CenterMelting events of this type occur about once every 150 years on average. With the last one happening in 1889, this event is right on time”
Although about half of Greenland's ice sheet normally sees surface melting over the summer months, the speed and scale of this year's thaw surprised scientists, who described the phenomenon as "extraordinary".
Nasa said that nearly the entire ice cover of Greenland, from its thin, low-lying coastal edges to its centre, which is 3km (two miles) thick, experienced some degree of melting at its surface.
Until now, the most extensive melting seen by satellites in the past three decades was about 55% of the area.
According to ice core records, such pronounced melting at Summit station and across the ice sheet has not occurred since 1889.
"When we see melt in places that we haven't seen before, at least in a long period of time, it makes you sit up and ask what's happening," Nasa chief scientist Waleed Abdalati said.
"It's a big signal, the meaning of which we're going to sort out for years to come."
Watch this spaceHe said that, because this Greenland-wide melting has happened before - in 1889 - scientists are not yet able to determine whether this is a natural but rare event, or if it has been sparked by man-made climate change.
“Start Quote
End Quote Poul Christoffersen Scott Polar Research InstituteThe observation is in my view much more important than the recently reported break up of a large iceberg from Petermann Glacier”
"Ice cores from Summit show that melting events of this type occur about once every 150 years on average. With the last one happening in 1889, this event is right on time," said Lora Koenig, a glaciologist from Nasa's Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland and a member of the research team analysing the satellite data.
"But if we continue to observe melting events like this in upcoming years, it will be worrisome."
Prof Eric Wolff, from the British Antarctic Survey (Bas) told BBC News: "There have clearly been some very warm days in Greenland this month. As a result, the surface snow has melted across the whole ice sheet.
"This is confirmed by some of my international colleagues who are on the ground at the NEEM ice core drilling site in north Greenland - they are reporting several days with temperatures above zero, and ice layers forming in the snow.
"While this is very unusual, as always we cannot attribute any individual extreme event to climate change: We will have to wait and see if more such events occur in the next few years to understand its significance for both the climate and the health of the ice sheet."
Dr Poul Christoffersen, a glaciologist and engineer at the Scott Polar Institute in Cambridge, told BBC News: "The melting seen in the satellite data is unprecedented, as it extends all the way across the ice sheet including the summit, which is located 3,200 m above sea level. Melting is usually limited to less than 2000m elevation."
The news comes just days after Nasa satellite imagery revealed that a massive iceberg, twice the size of Manhattan, had broken off the Petermann Glacier in Greenland.
"The observation [from Greenland] is in my view much more important than the recently reported break up of a large iceberg from Petermann Glacier," Dr Christofferson added.
Nasa's Tom Wagner said: "This event, combined with other natural but uncommon phenomena, such as the large calving event last week on Petermann Glacier, are part of a complex story."
Scientists said they believed that much of Greenland's ice was already freezing again.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~26~RS~)


Obama calls for nuclear arsenal cuts
Sopranos actor James Gandolfini dies
Jumpstarting Motor City
Baby on board
Warning from history
Day in pictures
On the move in Mumbai
Comment number 699.
richardbamberg25th July 2012 - 16:59
While a thought provoking (and comment provoking) article, I'd like to see a comparison of the solar energy output charted against cycles like this 150 year cycle of melt. If the solar ouput shows no correlation to these events, I'd be surprised.
Link to this (Comment number 699)
Comment number 616.
Bryaugh25th July 2012 - 14:37
Well, they did say that this happens roughly once every hundred and fifty years, so it's not even worth batting an eyelid over until it starts to happen more often. Anyway, it's not like it's a new thing for the Earth to be much warmer than it is now. The climate is always changing and always has been.
Link to this (Comment number 616)
Comment number 329.
George25th July 2012 - 11:44
As the song says 'Why worry? - Be happy!' There's no point in running around like a headless chicken, panicking about what is going to happen. People - its going to happen anyway! Still, maybe they'll sell a few million 'how to survive the apocolypse' courses......Come to think of it, I just happen to have a copy; interested? :-)
Link to this (Comment number 329)
Comment number 321.
Purlieu25th July 2012 - 11:42
Get a grip - this ice is 2 miles thick, the map shows where there is a few inches of surface melt. Work it out.
Link to this (Comment number 321)
Comment number 320.
Dragonwight25th July 2012 - 11:42
The world is constantly evolving and change is inevitable what we as humans can do is try to ensure as many species survive that change as possible.Those people that complain that human progress has damaged the planet need to rememeber that one day this planet will no longer exist and if any life of it is to survive then humans must progress technologically to a stage where we can leave.
Link to this (Comment number 320)
Comments 5 of 10