Europe's long, uncomfortable summer

 
Tourists and locals sit in restaurants on Monastiraki Square in Athens Greece may get a new government, but the crisis seems certain to return later in the year

Events, with all their unpredictability, are driving the European crisis. Europe's leaders have plans, but they are not in control.

They react, but they cannot manage this crisis. They repeatedly make mistakes because they do not understand the crisis they have created.

When Spain's banks needed rescuing European officials allowed themselves a moment of congratulation.

They had not just acted decisively, in their view, but in coming up with 100bn euros (£81bn; $127bn) they believed they had drawn a line under the problem.

The Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy said: "The credibility of the euro won, its future and the EU".

Within hours, outsiders realised that this 100bn euros was a loan which would add to Spanish government debt.

The bank bailout was an admission that Spain itself could not protect its banks and therefore exposed its own weakness. So a bailout of the banks has only deepened the Spanish crisis.

European officials veer from one favoured remedy to another. At one stage it was building up rescue funds. For a period, the emphasis was on common debt, eurobonds. The current favourite is a banking union.

Trapped

Already, expectations for the summit at the end of next week are being downgraded. The President of the European Council, Herman Van Rompuy, has hinted that no definitive measures will be agreed. It would be more about setting out a roadmap.

Start Quote

Europe ... understands that an entirely different eurozone and European Union may be needed to save its currency but it shies away from a 'big leap' that might not have the backing of the people”

End Quote

"Even if we, in June, will not take definitive decisions, the path and trajectory are very clear for everybody," he said.

So there will probably be agreement on the need for greater supervision of national banks. The much more sensitive issue of a joint bank deposit guarantee is for the longer term.

And that brings us to the dilemma at the heart of the crisis. The eurozone is made up of 17 different countries that still see their identity in the nation state.

None of them have voted for a full fiscal union - where tax and spending are decided at European level - let alone a political union.

And yet, many of Europe's leaders believe the single currency can only be saved by much closer integration.

Germany's Chancellor Merkel believes that only with fiscal and political union can the zone consider common debt.

The mood, however, in Europe is not in favour of further integration. Parties wary of a centralisation of power in Brussels have performed well in the polls.

UK Prime Minister David Cameron understands the dilemma. Speaking in Mexico, he said: "It was very difficult politically to take the steps that are required economically."

And so Europe is trapped. It understands that an entirely different eurozone and European Union may be needed to save its currency, but it shies away from a "big leap" that might not have the backing of the people.

So the frustration. It bubbled over yesterday when the President of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso, said in Mexico: "We are not coming here to receive lessons in terms of democracy or in terms of how to manage our economy."

Europe's leaders like to say that the crisis started in America in 2008 and not in their own backyard. It didn't. The crisis started when the criteria for joining a single currency were fudged, allowing in countries like Greece.

But the real roots of the crisis lay in such different economies sharing the same interest rate. It led, in some countries, to unsustainable bubbles that the crisis in 2008 only exposed.

The dilemmas are not just fundamental.

France, later this month, will receive a report from its auditors on the true state of French finances. Almost certainly, France will need to make extra savings this year and next.

The honeymoon period for President Hollande will be truly over. What will the champion of "growth first" do as he struggles to live up to his commitment to reduce the deficit to 3% by next year?

Cost of the crisis

Greece is fundamentally unstable. The political turmoil has meant that it will fail to meet its budget targets.

Further savings are due whilst its economy is in freefall.

Will Europe loosen the strings and give Athens more time to balance its budget? It is another dilemma.

Some, like the Austrian chancellor, say that "one should also give the Greek population air to breathe".

Angela Merkel, however, says "there can be no loosening of the reform steps". The Greek crisis almost certainly will return later this year.

The fundamental questions for the eurozone lie unanswered. What, in the final analysis, stands behind this currency? How will large countries like Spain and Italy be saved if they get into trouble? Where will growth come from, without which there can be no solution?

And, at the end of the day, will Chancellor Merkel persuade the German people that they will have to pay - vast amounts - to save the euro? And will Europeans be willing to sacrifice democracy if that is the price of ending the crisis?

The dilemmas of the European summer.

 
Gavin Hewitt, Europe editor Article written by Gavin Hewitt Gavin Hewitt Europe editor

More on This Story

Global Economy

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 255.

    @#254 Lucy is right. Here's a link that explains it. http://www.frumforum.com/states-cant-go-bankrupt/

    Basically, there is no legal basis for states to go bankrupt. Worst case, they can become insolvent in which case the Feds would bail them out. That's only happened once and the state later repaid its debts.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 254.

    240. LucyJ
    "In USA our states cannot go bankrupt"

    Are you sure? Municipalities, cities and counties certainly can go bankrupt in the US do States have some kind of legal protections?

    The problem in the EZ isn't that they are countries, it's that they are no longer sovereigns and therefore not able to decide the value of their own currency.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 253.

    237.quietoaktree

    "Europe (incl. UK) and its citizens have failed"

    ===

    I'm touched that you describe us constitutionless UK subjects as "citizens".

    However, I'd say that above all, it is "we" who could have done better, by engaging with democracy, and taking matters into our hands. But no, "we" let Rupert Murdoch tell us what to think and do...

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 252.

    247 Lucy

    "We are in different situation than Greece, Italy, Spain, more globally connected- we're a 'Megacountry'
    =
    Bigger empires have failed before you - I'm afraid size makes no difference.
    In the case of Spain they had one of the biggest and wealthiest global empires ever. Ditto Italy (Rome), Greece and Portugal ruled over huge chunks of the then known world.

    All gone now.

  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 251.

    250.margaret howard Was he an adopted child going to Cambridge ? I would never thought you would allow your own child to attend an ENGLISH University?
    Your love for the euro is based on the Banks refusal to accept your son's foreign currency? smiling

    feel free to answer my other blogs when you have consulted Wikipedia Margaret....I'm in no hurry.

 

Comments 5 of 255

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.