Fixing the eurozone

 
French President Nicolas Sarkozy (left) and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Brussels - 23 October 2011 France and Germany disagree on how to expand the firepower of the EU's main bailout fund

The expectation is immense. A deadline looms. Wednesday evening. The leaders of Germany and France set the date to deliver a solution to the eurozone crisis.

There are no easy tasks but the French president and the German chancellor began the day by calling in the Italian leader Silvio Berlusconi.

He was given a talking to, a dressing down. France and Germany both believe the Italians do not have a convincing plan to deal with their public finances. They want more cuts in public spending, reforms to make it easier to hire and fire, to set up companies and changes to the pension system.

Later German Chancellor Angela Merkel put it like this: "Trust will not just be achieved through a firewall, instead trust needs a clear perspective, and Italy has great economic strength, but Italy has also a very high total debt, and that must credibly be cut in the next few years. That is what is expected of Italy."

Increasingly they see Italy as posing the greatest risk to the single currency. It has low growth, high unemployment and a debt-to-GDP ratio of 120%. And Italy - with its large bond market - threatens the eurozone's banking system.

President Nicolas Sarkozy and Chancellor Merkel also attempted a display of unity after their row last week.

But progress is elusive. There clearly has been agreement on the need for the banks to raise more capital. Around 100bn euros ($139bn; £87bn). But that is the easy part and many of the details remain elusive, including which banks will be involved and where will the funds come from. Squeezing taxpayers has become politically impossible.

Britain's worry

The two big remaining challenges are how to deal with Greek debt and increasing the firepower of the zone's main bailout fund.

Discussion of these issues was delayed by a heated argument between President Sarkozy and David Cameron. The British prime minister had become concerned at being marginalised at a critical moment for Europe.

Although not in the euro, the fear of Downing Street was that decisions taken by the inner core of 17 eurozone countries could impact, say, on financial services.

So David Cameron wanted safeguards to ensure that British interests were protected. The argument also revolved around whether the last meeting on Wednesday night should involve the leaders of all 27 EU states or just the 17 members of the eurozone. The British wanted the wider EU to have a final say.

President Sarkozy would have none of it. He was pugnacious, pointing out that the UK wasn't even in the eurozone. It got very direct with the French president pointing out that as Britain hadn't put its hand in its pocket they shouldn't lecture others.

He said: "You're criticising us every day in the media, telling us what to do. Enough is enough. And now you want to interfere in our meetings."

In the event there will be a full European summit followed by a eurozone summit. But the row consumed two hours. What it signposts is future conflict, with Britain struggling to protect vital national interests in the face of a core group of countries that holds its own meetings.

The more closely integrated the eurozone becomes - as urged, for instance, by George Osborne - the greater the British fear will be that decisions will be taken that impacts on their major concerns such as preserving and expanding the single market.

Market judgement

Attention has now turned to Greek debt. The Germans insist that the problems of Greece must be put on a realistic footing and resolved. That means reducing Greek debt which is heading towards a debt to GDP ratio of 170%.

Berlin wants private investors - the banks - to take much bigger losses. Perhaps as much as 50%. But again the key questions have not yet been addressed. Will this be on a voluntary basis? Will the banks agree? The Greeks have insisted that any solution must be voluntary or it risks triggering a credit default.

And then there is the most contentious issue - how to expand the firepower of the EU's main bailout fund, the EFSF. It has already sparked a serious disagreement between the French and the Germans. Chancellor Merkel again ruled out turning the EFSF into a bank that could tap the European Central Bank for funds. Reluctantly, President Sarkozy seems to accept that.

Two options remain on the table. Firstly, enabling troubled countries to use the fund as a kind of insurance scheme which would limit the risks for potential investors. Secondly, some are suggesting using the EFSF to create a spin-off fund, a special purpose vehicle, which the IMF and emerging countries can invest in. The ideas are complex, untested and not fully understood even by some of the technical experts.

The hours between now and Wednesday night will involve long and tense negotiations. Success is not guaranteed although the leaders fear the judgement of the markets on Thursday morning if there is failure.

Angela Merkel says Wednesday night won't be the last step. Maybe not, but Europe's leaders have to convince the world they have a grip on the crisis.

A footnote. Treaty change is now firmly on the agenda. It will be needed to approve plans to more closely integrate the eurozone economies. The government has long opposed opening up the treaties but today David Cameron saw an opening.

Treaty changes require the approval of all 27 countries. At his news conference Prime Minister Cameron three times said that this gave opportunities to further advance British national interests. He did not set out what those interests might be. He did not indicate whether they might involve repatriating powers. But this was a message intended for his restive backbenchers who on Monday will seek a referendum on Britain's place in Europe. What the prime minister was in effect saying was - forget the referendum, there are other games in town.

That may be true but other countries are required to consult their voters on treaty changes. How could the British government deny voters a say if other countries are deciding on whether they accept a newly-designed EU? Treaty change carries great risks for the UK coalition.

 
Gavin Hewitt, Europe editor Article written by Gavin Hewitt Gavin Hewitt Europe editor

EU tackles crises in Iraq and Ukraine

The EU struggles to agree on action to contain the conflicts in Iraq and Ukraine, the BBC's Gavin Hewitt writes.

Read full article

More on This Story

Global Economy

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 1.

    Increasingly we see that governments do not do what their voters want. If fact it would appear that governments seem to think that the public should be the last to know what is going on. Not only that we see that governments are told what to do by other governments. Whether driven by necessity or not it does not make for comfortable reading. The public are such an irritation until tax is needed.

  • rate this
    -6

    Comment number 2.

    This report was not remotely doom and gloom ,which is unusual for a BBC report on the Euro crisis ,but then I noticed it was written by Gavin Hewitt (European Editor)and not one of the economical/business reporters so that explains it.Gavin hasnt got any agenda ie he isnt shorting to make even more money onto of a huge BBC salary,so we get a more levelled report on events.

  • rate this
    +12

    Comment number 3.

    Cameron wants to have his cake and eat it.

    He doesn't want the UK to commit to the EU financial bailout-out, yet still expects influence at the top table. Equally, he refuses to practice democracy at home through giving us a referendum offered to other members.

    Time is running out Mr Cameron, the truth is coming and although UK politicians have evaded it, real decisions will need to be taken.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 4.

    @2

    Problem has never been money. Greece is little more than 2% of EU GDP. 110 Billn euros is supposedly a big deal yet one country alone - the UK can issue 200Billn GBP QE (Pt1, Pt2).

    Have you not noticed what is happening to something called democracy whether Greece, UK, Germany etc etc, EU treaty modification. Theatre

    'For me every ruler is alien that defies public opinion'
    Mohandas Gandhi

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 5.

    For better or worse the UK isn't in the eurozone and we're hardly in a position to lecture it on what it should be doing. The amount of hot air is staggering: we ALL know everybody the world over should get their lending/debt sorted out and the economy restarted; none of these "leaders" need keep on about it. Anyway, we have yet to see if the euro survives this fracas.

 

Comments 5 of 175

 

This entry is now closed for comments

Features

  • OrangemanPunctured pride?

    How would N Ireland's Orangemen feel if Scotland left the union?


  • MarchionessThames tragedy

    Survivors and victims' families remember Marchioness disaster


  • Sheep on Achill IslandMass exodus

    Why hundreds of thousands of people have left Ireland


  • A teenaged mother in the Zaatari campUntold misery

    The plight of Syria's refugee child brides


  • Michael MosleyMeat feast?

    Which is the best eco option - eating beef, chicken or mussels?


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.