Mladic shuns 'monstrous' charges

 

Gen Mladic responds to the charges in The Hague

Ex-Bosnian Serb army head Ratko Mladic has made his first appearance at The Hague war crimes tribunal, but said he would not enter a plea to the "monstrous" and "obnoxious" charges.

He is charged with crimes in the 1992-95 Bosnian war, including the massacre of about 7,500 people in Srebrenica.

Gen Mladic told the court he had been "defending my people and my country".

He also said he was "gravely ill", but a court spokeswoman said health checks had shown he was fit to stand trial.

Nerma Jelacic said a variety of tests had been done on Gen Mladic since he arrived at The Hague, but none had turned up any health issues to cause concern.

Gen Mladic, who was arrested last week in Serbia, is charged with genocide, persecution, extermination, murder, deportation, inhumane acts, terror, deportation and hostage-taking, according to the tribunal indictment.

At the scene

There he was - older, balding but instantly recognisable. He saluted as he walked slowly into court wearing a light khaki cap and a grey jacket.

"I am General Ratko Mladic," he said. "I am a gravely ill man and I need time to organise my defence".

He showed only flashes of emotion but occasionally spoke with contempt. He described the charges against him as "obnoxious and monstrous" and entered no plea.

But the chief judge's summary of the indictment was a thesaurus of brutality. In the judge's own words: "Genocide, persecution, murder, extermination, deportation, forcible transfer, torture, rape and plunder."

Prosecutors say this was his part in a plot to achieve the "elimination or permanent removal" of Muslims from large parts of Bosnia in pursuit of a Greater Serbia.

'Be patient'

In his first hearing before the International Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, Gen Mladic, 69, was asked if he could understand the proceedings and he confirmed that he could.

He gave his name and date of birth, although the date was different from the court records.

Court-appointed Serbian lawyer Aleksandar Aleksic represented Gen Mladic at the hearing. Gen Mladic may choose a permanent counsel for the trial later, or opt to conduct his own defence.

Judge Alphons Orie said the purpose of the hearing was to list the charges against Gen Mladic and ask him for a plea.

Gen Mladic's rights were read out in court, but he said: "I am a gravely ill man and need more time to understand what was read out, so please be patient."

The judge then asked if Gen Mladic had read and understood the indictment against him.

Gen Mladic said he needed at least two months to read the three binders of documents that had been brought to him.

However, Mr Aleksic said he believed his client had understood the indictment.

Gen Mladic then told the judge: "I do not want a single letter or sentence of that indictment to be read out to me."

However, the judge proceeded to read out a summary of the charges.

At some points, Gen Mladic shook his head.

John Simpson said the man in the dock was a ''shrunken'' and ''milder'' character

When asked to enter a plea, he said the charges were "monstrous" and he needed more than a month to respond.

If Gen Mladic does not enter a plea within 30 days, the judges will enter pleas of not guilty on his behalf.

After a brief recess, the hearing moved into private session so Gen Mladic could express concerns about his health.

Then as the hearing ended, Gen Mladic said: "I defended my people, my country... now I am defending myself. I just have to say that I want to live to see that I am a free man."

He added: "I don't want to be helped to walk as if I were some blind cripple. If I want help, I'll ask for it."

BBC world affairs editor John Simpson, in the courtroom, said Gen Mladic had looked over at him and given a mocking salute.

At one point, one of the Srebrenica widows had caught Gen Mladic's eye and made a throat-cutting gesture, to which he smiled, adds our correspondent.

A new hearing was set for 4 July.

'Still searching'

Relatives of some of the victims of the war gathered outside the courtroom awaiting Gen Mladic's arrival.

The Charges

  • Counts 1/2: Genocide of Bosniaks and Bosnian Croats in Bosnia-Hercegovina and Srebrenica
  • Count 3: Persecutions
  • Counts 4/5/6: Extermination and murder
  • Counts 7/8: Deportation and inhumane acts
  • Counts 9/10: Terror and unlawful attacks
  • Count 11: Taking of UN hostages

Munira Subasic, whose son and husband died in Srebrenica, told Reuters: "In 1995 I begged him to let my son go. He listened to me and promised to let him go. I trusted him at that moment.

"Sixteen years later, I am still searching for my son's bones."

Gen Mladic had earlier been examined by doctors in the medical facility of the detention unit at The Hague after arriving on Tuesday night.

On Thursday, Mr Aleksic said of his client: "He has not had proper healthcare for years and his condition is not good."

Also on Thursday, Mr Saljic said Gen Mladic had been treated for cancer two years ago at a Belgrade hospital.

Mr Saljic has previously been quoted as saying by Serbian media that his client had suffered three strokes and two heart attacks, was too ill to be sent to The Hague and would not live to the end of a trial.

One lawyer representing victims, Axel Hageldoorn, told Associated Press there was concern that "he is too sick to follow the trial to its end and there will be no verdict".

As well as Srebrenica, Europe's worst atrocity since World War II, Gen Mladic is also charged over the 44-month siege of the capital Sarajevo from May 1992 in which 10,000 people died.

Former Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic died of a heart attack at The Hague in 2006, four years into his own genocide trial.

War in the former Yugoslavia 1991 - 1999

The former Yugoslavia was a Socialist state created after German occupation in World War II and a bitter civil war. A federation of six republics, it brought together Serbs, Croats, Bosnian Muslims, Albanians, Slovenes and others under a comparatively relaxed communist regime. Tensions between these groups were successfully suppressed under the leadership of President Tito.
After Tito's death in 1980, tensions re-emerged. Calls for more autonomy within Yugoslavia by nationalist groups led in 1991 to declarations of independence in Croatia and Slovenia. The Serb-dominated Yugoslav army lashed out, first in Slovenia and then in Croatia. Thousands were killed in the latter conflict which was paused in 1992 under a UN-monitored ceasefire.
Bosnia, with a complex mix of Serbs, Muslims and Croats, was next to try for independence. Bosnia's Serbs, backed by Serbs elsewhere in Yugoslavia, resisted. Under leader Radovan Karadzic, they threatened bloodshed if Bosnia's Muslims and Croats - who outnumbered Serbs - broke away. Despite European blessing for the move in a 1992 referendum, war came fast.
Yugoslav army units, withdrawn from Croatia and renamed the Bosnian Serb Army, carved out a huge swathe of Serb-dominated territory. Over a million Bosnian Muslims and Croats were driven from their homes in ethnic cleansing. Serbs suffered too. The capital Sarajevo was besieged and shelled. UN peacekeepers, brought in to quell the fighting, were seen as ineffective.
International peace efforts to stop the war failed, the UN was humiliated and over 100,000 died. The war ended in 1995 after NATO bombed the Bosnian Serbs and Muslim and Croat armies made gains on the ground. A US-brokered peace divided Bosnia into two self-governing entities, a Bosnian Serb republic and a Muslim-Croat federation lightly bound by a central government.
In August 1995 the Croatian army stormed areas in Croatia under Serb control prompting thousands to flee. Soon Croatia and Bosnia were fully independent. Slovenia and Macedonia had already gone. Montenegro left later. In 1999 Kosovo's ethnic Albanians fought Serbs in another brutal war to gain independence. Serbia ended the conflict beaten, battered and alone.
BACK {current} of {total} NEXT
 
 

More on This Story

Mladic on trial

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 157.

    I dont know why anybody did not do anything about it. I remember to ask to myself when I was a kid why anybody does anything for them ? It´s a shame for UN, and for anybody who could do something but did not do anything.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 93.

    What happened to the notion "Justice Delayed is Justice Denied"? Ratko Mladic is using all tactics availlable to him to delay the course of Justice, and as a consequence of his advancing age and poor health as his defence says, relatives of his victims may never get to see justice as they should have wanted. The most example is the case for Slobodan Milosovic who died before his sentence.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 92.

    If guilty I hope he gets all that is coming to him but I don't fancy his chances of a fair trial.
    Serbian death camp fraud anyone?
    If the West was and still is (babies thrown out of incubators, WMD's, buried nuclear warheads, saving private Lynch, suicidal weapons inspectors, Gadaffi strafing protesters etc, etc) prepared to lie to their public to justify wars then a fair trial seems unlikely

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 77.

    Let's get one or two things straight. The conflict in the former Yugoslavia was not about defending Serbian culture. It was an ugly, expansionist war aimed at creating a Greater Serbia. I see that certain posters still hanker after this shattered dream. Thankfully, the government in Belgrade seems to be looking to the future rather than living in the past.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 67.

    I may not have lived in Bosnia. Many atrocities occured on both sides but dont you think the people who commited these crimes should be brought to account for their part in this war.

 

Comments 5 of 10

 

More Europe stories

RSS

Features

  • RihannaCloud caution

    After celebrity leaks, what can you do to safeguard your photos?


  • Cesc FabregasFair price?

    Have some football clubs overpaid for their new players?


  • John CurticePolls analysis

    Professor John Curtice analyses the latest polls on the referendum


  • Woman and hairdryerBlow back

    Would banning high-power appliances actually save energy?


  • Rack of lambFavourite feast

    Is the UK unusually fond of lamb and potatoes?


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.