Hitler's Atlantic Wall: Should France preserve it?

 
The Atlantic Wall was Adolf Hitler's name for the fortifications that were the cornerstone of his Fortress Europe defences against Allied invasion. Construction of the complex network of concrete barriers and gun emplacements was overseen by the Fuhrer's chief architect, Albert Speer, seen here on the left with Hitler.
The first fortifications were a response to a series of British commando raids along the French and Norwegian coasts during 1941. Further successful raids accelerated the construction until the wall stretched along 2,685km (1,670 miles) of coastline. Many still survive today.
Batterie Lindemann was one of the most fearsome weapons incorporated into the Atlantic Wall. The massive casement for the main gun measured 50m long by 17m high. There were three in all. In total they fired 2,450 406mm rounds, mostly against coastal traffic, but also against Dover and other English ports.
Construction of the Atlantic Wall absorbed huge resources. Built by slave labour and other non-German volunteer labour, the fortifications consumed over 17m cubic metres of concrete and 1.2m tonnes of steel. The cost was astronomical, some 3.7bn Deutschmarks in France alone.
The strongest defences were around the French ports which Hitler viewed as the most likely targets of an Allied invasion. Dubbed the Iron Coast, these defences were circumvented by the D-Day invasion on the Normandy beaches where the defences were weaker. The Atlantic Wall was breached in a day.
Coastal erosion since the end of the war has left many bunkers stranded on the beach. These in the south of France around the Bay of Arcachon are being excavated by a group of local enthusiasts. Some retain their original camouflage and war-time grafitti.
The best-preserved bunker sites are probably those around the D-Day Normandy beaches, such as this gun emplacement. Many much smaller gun positions and anti-tank defences are scattered around the countryside and can still be found almost untouched since the day the last German troops departed.
BACK {current} of {total} NEXT
 

Sections of Hitler's Atlantic Wall are being restored by French enthusiasts. But should the Nazi fortification be fully embraced as part of the country's heritage?

Along 800 miles (1,287km) of French coast lie some of the most substantial and evocative vestiges of war-time Europe.

Blockaus BA22 Barbara, part of the Atlantic Wall, in Bayonne, southwestern France Remaining sections of the wall have fallen into disrepair

The so-called Atlantic Wall - Hitler's defensive system against an expected Allied attack - stretched all the way from the Spanish border to Scandinavia.

Inevitably, it was in France that the most extensive building took place. Today there are still thousands of blockhouses, barracks and gun emplacements visible along the French shore.

But in France there has been no effort up until now to preserve this extraordinary historical landmark.

Elsewhere, World War II bunkers have been renovated as tourist attractions or for educational visits. The internet boasts Atlantic Wall fan sites in Germany and the Netherlands - and strong interest in the UK - but nothing in France.

It is as though the nation was relieved to see the German defences slide inexorably into the sands - and oblivion.

But now - quite suddenly - a new mood has emerged. Recently, several local associations dedicated to safeguarding portions of the Wall have been set up in France.

Times have moved on, memories of the war have lapsed, and a new generation no longer feels pain or guilt, but curiosity.

Wall finds home in New Orleans

Section of Atlantic Wall in New Orleans

In July 2011, the National World War II Museum in New Orleans, US, took receipt of three sections of the Atlantic Wall (part of it is pictured above).

The huge chunks - complete with pockmarks from bullets and artillery rounds fired by incoming Allied troops - were donated by the Utah Beach Museum in Normandy.

"To see only a small portion of what our troops had to overcome to begin to liberate Europe, to be able to feel the chips and holes made in the wall by their artillery, it really gives you a renewed sense of appreciation for their sacrifice," says museum president Dr Nick Mueller.

National World War II Museum

"It really has been very rapid. In just the last three or four years, there has been a radical change," says Marc Mentel, founder of Gramasa (Archaeological Research Group for the Atlantic Wall: Arcachon Sector).

"Today people are constantly coming up to us at our sites and wanting to know more about the Wall. In the past, the whole issue was too painful, it brought back too many bad memories.

"Time had to do its work. For me personally, there was no way I could have started the association until the death of my grandfather. He had been a prisoner in the war. For his generation, the Wall was something you preferred not to think about.

"Funnily enough, I think it was the death of the last poilu (World War I veteran) a couple of years ago that was the trigger. Suddenly now we see that World War II is slipping into history too."

Members of the association spend their weekends clearing and restoring German bunkers around the bay of Arcachon, a beautiful area of oyster beds, pine woods and tourist beaches to the west of Bordeaux.

Falling into the sea

The sector was too far south to be a likely contender for Allied landings. Nonetheless, the Germans had a complex of emplacements defending the narrow entrance to the bay and the port of Arcachon.

Some of the defences were on the actual beaches, where they are now gradually falling victim to the tides and shifting sands. Others - mainly gun batteries - were on higher ground, and are relatively intact.

'The ignominy we endured'

War veteran who worked on the Wall

Rene-Georges Lubat, 91, is one of the few Frenchmen who worked on the Wall who is still alive. In 1942 he was "volunteered" by his village mayor and sent to work on defences in the Arcachon sector.

"There was no choice about it. We had to go," he said. "Naturally we weren't enthusiastic, but it is not as if we had any choice.

"The conditions were not terrible. We weren't beaten or anything and we got a basic wage. At the start we could go home on Sundays, but after Stalingrad they put up barbed wire and we were stuck inside the work camp.

"Of course we knew we were building defences for the Germans, and it felt bad. I remember at the end of the war, my two brothers came home. One had been a prisoner, the other a deportee. I felt so bad I did not want to go to the party celebrating their return.

"But I do think the wall should be preserved now. It is important to remember what happened - the ignominy of it all, the cataclysm that we had to endure."

By studying German military maps, Mentel was able to pinpoint where one bunker had apparently disappeared. In fact it was buried beneath the sands next to the lighthouse at Cap Ferret, one of the promontories guarding the bay of Arcachon.

The association has now dug away the sands, revealing concrete walls still showing signs of the original camouflage. There is also an intriguing outside mural - drawn by some bored German soldier - of a man in a boater hat smoking a pipe.

Such amateur art works are quite common. In another emplacement across the entrance to the bay, there is a cartoon of a jazz band - sadly, rather hidden by modern-day graffiti.

"The Germans built the bunkers according to absolutely standard patterns, so we can walk into one and know straight away where everything will be - the hole for the radio mast, another for the periscope, the air vents, the sleeping area and so on," said amateur archaeologist Jean-Francois Laquieze.

"The blockhouses that are on the beaches, I don't think there is any way we can save. They are already disappearing into the sands, or in some cases are already under water.

"The ones that are slightly inland we can preserve. But there the problem is encroaching urbanisation. Town authorities are under pressure to open up more and more land for building.

"Nowadays we wouldn't for a minute consider destroying our mediaeval castles. But that is what is exactly happening to the Atlantic Wall, which is just as much part of our history," he said.

Blindness

If the French preferred for 70 years to avert their gaze from the Wall, it is perhaps for understandable reasons.

The fortifications were after all German fortifications - emblems to the French of their own national humiliation. But there is more to it than that - the Wall was not just a symbol of defeat - but of collaboration.

"A lot of French construction companies got very rich out of building the Wall," said Jerome Prieur, author of a 2010 book, Le Mur Atlantique.

"After the war, France needed those same companies for the task of reconstruction. So no-one said anything. There was a wilful blindness, in which everyone was complicit."

House in southwestern France One section of the wall has even been turned into part of a house

In addition, many thousands of French men were forced to work on the Wall as part of an arrangement between the Vichy government and the Organisation Todt, the Nazis' civil engineering group.

There are some who believe France should declare the Atlantic Wall to be a historic monument, thus ensuring its preservation - or at least of parts of it.

That will never happen. No French government would elevate a symbol of national dishonour.

But what is intriguing is how the French people have themselves now taken the initiative, safeguarding what for them is less a mark of shame, more part of the collective memory.

 

More on This Story

In today's Magazine

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 94.

    "Such amateur art works ... a cartoon of a jazz band - sadly, rather hidden by modern-day graffiti."

    I find it interesting how old Nazi graffiti is art, modern French is vandalism. Yet in another 50 years both will be equally elevated.
    I bet the modern painters of that bunker were glad the Nazi's were not still resident.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 93.

    i hink for everyoneis worth to look thorough and dig very well in his past, to better drive his future... a very great man once told .... and i add also, you would know were you are going.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 92.

    think there may be another more insidious reason why some French are reluctant to remember the events of WW2. As Andrew Robert's new history of WW2 - The Storm of War - highlights the French collaboration with the Nazi occupiers went far beyond that which the French public would be happy to admit. Sometimes the past is well left alone!

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 91.

    Like many things in history it's distasteful to our current way of life but that is not to say it should be erased. It should serve as a reminder to future generations.... Some people insist on changing historical fact to suit todays sensibilities but I think we should not dilute or amend but teach all of the facts but in context.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 90.

    Though I have lived in Paris for 22 years I am a Brit. I see these bunkers as monuments as a totally necessary reminder of war and its consequenses. They are very sobering to look at. PLEASE preserve them and add artificial guns so they look as original as possible. This is necessary for the the forthcoming generations never to consider this as "normal".

  • rate this
    -4

    Comment number 89.

    @Peter_Sym

    What utter twoddle

    WWII was to do with social rule, the 'rise' of communism had far more to do with WWII than tanks & tactics.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-German_Naval_Agreement
    http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/germany_and_rearmament.htm

    Amazing to think there are still people running around with this Eton-like perspective of Great-British unity

  • rate this
    +6

    Comment number 88.

    The fact of the matter is that these remnants of war are the heritage of the 20th century to the 21st. I may be a history buff but I say that they should be preserved. While preserving 100% of the remaining structures is fools errand with the cost and work hours, we must show our children's children a real monument of the evil human beings are capable of. If not a reminder, as a cautionary tale.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 87.

    Peter_Sym #74 I'm guessing leadership also played its part! Those french nationals that had their house linked to part of the wall had even less shame than those french that helped build and profit from it! Any monies spent should go to maintaing the allied forces war graves first and the nazis & its allies second...

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 86.

    Keep them as a warning from the past.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 85.

    CONTINUED 3
    Visit the area now, different people live there & now all you see is signs - NO SWIMMING/BOATING/FISHING NO CAMPING KEEP OUT etc, obstacles are even placed to prevent access.
    WWII was a fight for freedom, but so much freedom in UK has since been destroyed & denied & enjoyment is so often limited to official areas where the public even have to pay for parking a car in remote areas

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 84.

    CONTINUED 2
    As a young child investigating, it was exciting, especially learning a bit about them, but no-one really knew the actual & real use & history.
    It was a popular area for familys & kids day out & on a sidestrip beside river we & other familys camped & in caravanettes.
    Farmers & locals were friendly & we got to know a few & visited & stayed with them on occassion.

    CONTINUED

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 83.

    1
    As kids, our family used to go out into countryside a few miles away, loads of familys did the same, a minor river to swim & boat & play in, woodlands with tall trees with huge vines/whatever, that tarzan used in films & we swung on across the woodland & across the river.
    Investigating the woodland further we came across a secret WWII military post with bunkers & other buildings

    CONTINUED

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 82.

    always preserve - the alternative leaves you no choice

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 81.

    Ultimately its part of history and heritage of Europe, and French would do no dishonor by trying to preserve the sites for coming generations to see and understand what WWII was about. Looking at it broadly, it should be one of the pillars that should bring Europe and Europeans even closer together.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 80.

    I spent nearly all of 1968 living and working in one of these huge concrete structures. It was the most complete one of three on a stretch of Atlantic facing beach on the Ile d'Oleron. The French had tried, unsuccessfully, to destroy them after the war and, as they were on a rarely visited site, left them. An enterprising Frenchman converted one into a Beach Bar/Nightclub.

  • rate this
    +9

    Comment number 79.

    It's important to keep some of these buildings, for example you could argue Hadrians Wall is along similar lines, a foreign occupation protecting its boundaries from invasion/intervention.

    So yes restore and remember so it will never happen again.

  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 78.

    Hadrians wall and Norman castles are symbols of England being ruled by "foreign" powers. In time the ignominy of being subjegated has gone and we now look at them as important historical landmarks of our history.
    In most invaded countries history shows us time and time again the 10-10-80 split where 10% actively resist, 10% collaborate and 80% just try to get on with their lives and survive.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 77.

    I remember visiting the U-boat pens at St Nazaire a couple of years ago. It is home to various minor commercial boat businesses and a small museum about transatlantic liners but there is NOTHING to acknowledge what the building is, not a single explanatory sign, stand or information board. Very strange.....

  • rate this
    -10

    Comment number 76.

    the french as usual are doing the right thing. ignoring it as irrelevant and letting it rot away to nothing. it deserves no attention. once they become unstable, they should be destroyed and the rubble simply left.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 75.

    Of course they should be preserved, when they are gone they're gone.
    What if the pyramids or the coliseum were demolished years ago

 

Page 10 of 14

 

Features

  • PlanesTest of nerve

    WW1 fighter pilots who navigated using a school atlas


  • Pauline Borghese What the butler saw

    Scandalous tales from the British embassy in Paris


  • A baby holds an adult's fingerSmall Data

    The time when the average age of death was zero


  • League of LegendsBattle for glory

    On the ground at League of Legends World Championship's final


  • Vinyl record pressing in AustraliaVinyl vibe

    Getting into the groove with Australia's last record maker


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.