Australia plans to impose carbon tax on worst polluters


Julia Gillard: "As a nation we need to put a price on carbon"

Related Stories

The Australian government has unveiled plans to impose a tax on carbon emissions for the worst polluters.

Prime Minister Julia Gillard said carbon dioxide emissions would be taxed at A$23 ($25; £15) per tonne from 2012.

The country's biggest economic reform in a generation will cover some 500 companies. In 2015, a market-based trading scheme will be introduced.

Households are expected to see consumer prices rise by nearly 1%, and the move has been criticised by the opposition.

Critics argue the levy would damage economic competitiveness.


  • scheme to start on 1 July 2012
  • levy threshold is 25,000 tonnes of CO2 per year
  • some 500 companies will be affected
  • agriculture, forestry and land are exempt
  • compensation for polluters to stay competitive
  • market-based trading scheme kicks in from 2015
  • target to cut 159m tonnes of CO2 by 2020

Australia is one of the world's worst emitters of greenhouse gases per head of population.

The country relies on coal for 80% of its electricity generation, and is a major coal exporter.

Charm offensive

Under the new scheme set to begin on 1 July 2012, the government plans to include any company that produces at least 25,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide per year.

However, agriculture, forestry and land will be excluded from the levy. Motorists are also to be exempt, except for heavy lorries.

Steelmakers, coal mines and electricity generators will receive compensation to ensure they stay in business. Other tax cuts are planned for consumers.

"As a nation, we need to put a price on carbon and create a clean energy future," Ms Gillard told a news conference in Canberra.

"Australians want to do the right thing by the environment."

The prime minister is due to make a televised address later on Sunday to try to sell the package to the nation.

The biggest polluters will be paying the fixed price per tonne of CO2 until 2015, when a market-based trading scheme is expected to be introduced.

The government will then set a floor price and an upper limit for at least the first three years to avoid excessive price fluctuations.

The energy industry and the political opposition have mounted a vociferous campaign against the carbon tax, with protests in all of Australia's major cities in March.

Critics argue a levy would damage economic competitiveness.

Opinion polls show roughly 60% of voters against the policy.

The government hopes to win them over by spending some of the cash raised by the carbon tax to compensate households for higher energy bills.

It is promising tax cuts for low and middle-income households, as well as increased state pension and welfare payments.

However, Australia's ABC national broadcaster says households are expected to see consumer prices - including food - rise by an average of 0.7% due to the effect of the carbon prices on large emitters.


Ms Gillard's coalition government has a majority of just one seat in the lower house of parliament.

Past attempts to get the tax through parliament were defeated.

Opposition leader Tony Abbott pledged to wage a political war against the proposed carbon levy.

He said: "A one-sided carbon tax, a unilateral carbon tax is an act of economic self-harm."

But now the Australian government's aim will be to cut 159m tonnes of carbon pollution by 2020, reducing emissions by 5% below 2000 levels.

Apart from the European Union, only New Zealand currently imposes a national carbon tax.

In the USA, President Barack Obama abandoned last year plans for a federal climate bill during his current term.


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 208.

    First we should think what is the most important for our society. I think it is safe life. Natural environment with clean air is so important for our healthy life. It is much more important than economic growth. Quite a few people in Japan finally have noticed this simple principle after experiencing Fukushima nuclear plant accident. Carbon emission tax is effective to get back clean air.

  • rate this

    Comment number 197.

    Once you even start the debate about "what to do", you have already accepted the wholly unclear premise that we can afford to do it, even if you accept that we should do something.
    There are no coherent plans to reduce carbon emissions, given populations growth and global trade. To start taxing without a coherent plan is ridiculous. Given the government debt in the west, it's suicidal.

  • rate this

    Comment number 126.

    Nothing is for free/everything has a cost. Better to face up and + pay the cost now, rather than take the benefit now and pay the cost in the future.

    Its a bit like a pension: if I spend my contribution now rather than save, I will have a higher standard of living now, but pay big time for it later.

    If I make a small provision now, I can have a more uniform standard of living.

    Greed kills

  • rate this

    Comment number 47.

    I spent a few years in Australia and have always said that for a country with as much sunshine and as much empty space as Australia not to have more solar power schemes is crazy.

    I understand the benefit of exporting coal for the countries economy but surely you could carpet huge areas of unusable desert and virtually power the whole country.

  • rate this

    Comment number 6.

    I lived in Oz for 2 years and the Aussies don't give a damn about the environment. They are so precious about what you take in, about protecting their unique land but once you're in they couldn't care less. Everyone drives huge SUVs, the houses have no insulation, heating on all winter, a/c on all summer, landfills are overflowing, you get punished for reusing shopping bags. It's frightening.


More Asia-Pacific stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.