Greens enjoy taste of power in Australia's parliament

 

The rise of the Australian Greens has come at the very moment when public support for forceful action on climate change is in decline. Future historians could be forgiven for finding this anomalous, because what appear to be two countervailing trends are occurring in parallel. However, they are part of the same phenomenon.

Bob Brown, 14 June 2011 Bob Brown: The most powerful man in Australian politics?

When Kevin Rudd signalled a retreat from the emissions trading scheme in April last year, in the face of mounting public opposition, the Greens reaped the harvest. For them, heightened scepticism in the public at large has helped deliver more power in Canberra.

At last year's federal election, the Greens won their first elected seat in the House of Representatives and booted their representation in the Senate from five lawmakers to nine. From this month on, they hold the balance of power in Australia's upper house, and no legislative proposals will secure passage without their backing, unless Labor can gain the support of the Liberal opposition.

In the House of Representatives, Julia Gillard relies on the Greens' Melbourne MP Adam Bandt to keep her minority government in power. If the Greens withdrew their support, the government would fall. The Australian Greens have never wielded so much power.

In all, the Greens now have 10 parliamentarians, the most of any third party in Australian politics since the war. Its victory in the seat of Melbourne, an inner city constituency long held by Labor, was also hugely indicative. It spoke of how the Greens have succeeded in attracting affluent progressives: highly-educated, highly-paid and often highly-principled voters who like good coffee and have traditionally supported Labor.

Anti-carbon tax protesters in Sydney, 1 July 2011 Some people think Labor is too beholden to the Greens

You could build a plausible case right now that Bob Brown, the party's veteran leader, is the most powerful man in Australian politics. That is certainly how the opposition have tried to portray him: as the de facto deputy prime minister or Julia Gillard's puppet-master.

So is the rise of the Greens a passing fad, or is it part of a more fundamental realignment of progressive politics in Australia? Put another way, are the Greens cashing in on Labor's long-term decline?

If you crunch the numbers, the answer appears to be yes. Writing in the Melbourne Age the other day, Shaun Carney noted that in the four general elections held so far in this century, Labor has only once got more than 40% of the primary vote (in 2001, it was 37.8%; in 2004, it was 37.6; in 2007, it was 43.4; and in 2010, it was 38%). As for the Greens, their share of the vote has more than doubled over the past decade. Last year, the Greens' lower house vote was 12% compared to 5% in 2001. 'Have Australians already seen the last majority national Labor government?' asked Carney.

Peter Hartcher, the political editor of the Sydney Morning Herald, sees this as a potentially seismic shift. "Labor is now in an existential crisis," he argued. "For the first time, it has a serious political challenger capable of taking seats from its left, as well as the traditional enemy on the right, the Coalition."

Third parties have come and gone before. At their peak, the Democrats had nine seats in Canberra. Now, the party that vowed to "keep the bastards honest" does not have any.

With power also comes scrutiny, and Labor and the Liberals claim that the Greens are a fringe party with some wacky ideas. Bob Brown has talked about a world parliament based in Australia and also wants to shut down the coal industry, which employs 140,000 people and accounts for $A60 billion in exports.

Others have warmed to the Greens agenda: its demand for the withdrawal of Australian troops from Afghanistan, its opposition to the monarchy, an end to mandatory detention for asylum seekers, a ban on junk food advertising and a lowering of the voting age to 16. In the era of heavily scripted politics - and policy by focus group - many admire Bob Brown for saying what he believes and sticking to his principles.

The irony - Labor insiders would call it the outrage - is that the Greens benefited from Kevin Rudd's retreat from the ETS, and yet they themselves stood in its path. Had the Greens lent their support in the Senate, when Rudd was trying to get his proposals enacted into law, the measure would have passed. The Greens opposed Rudd's measure because they did not believe it went far enough, opting for environmental perfectionism, according to the critics, over a compromise deal. Ultimately, however, the Greens have benefited from their own obstructionism. Indeed, at a time when the politics of climate change has played a part in the removal of two prime ministers and two opposition leaders - Brendan Nelson and Malcolm Turnbull - Bob Brown has turned this nettlesome issue to his party's advantage.

How long the Greens will be able to exercise so much power will be determined to a large extent on how they wield it now. If Bob Brown and his colleagues overplay their hand, they might be punished further down the line. If they are smart, they might put themselves in an indispensable position: as the party that Labor has no other choice but to work alongside if it wants to govern Australia.

 
Nick Bryant Article written by Nick Bryant Nick Bryant New York correspondent

Maine 'thinking locally' on Ebola nurse quarantine

Maine's governor is thinking locally - and politically - as he seeks to enforce a quarantine on a nurse who has been thinking globally, writes the BBC's Nick Bryant.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 11.

    @10 Woorigal.

    Dream on mate. Youse cockroaches are sure gunna crackle underfoot tonight.
    The new blue young ladies in ur team are not going to upset our magnificent Darren and Co who will yet again be showing the superior qualities of our maroons.
    The only good green is the Suncorp turf. Too good for NSW,note to ur ladies please respect same,no losing tantrums.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 10.

    There may well be a rise of green power in Canberra, but one thing's for sure - the Blues are gunna get up in Brisbane tonight.

    Come on New South Wales, squash them cane toads! Rip into 'em! Cattledoggg!!!

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 9.

    My best wishes to Australia. The advance of the Greens means at least ten years of hypocrisy, of troubles and instability, of pure search for political power without any consideration for the economical impacts. This is the lesson of the history in any other country in the world, and Australia seems predestinated to be devastated by this movement of starving fondamentalists.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 8.

    In this blog has define environment because it is define climate change in atmosphere also change. it most probably are used in this blog informative and enjoyable so v very nice.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 7.

    "highly-educated, highly-paid and often highly-principled voters who like good coffee"

    That's a very nice way of putting it. Greens support comes mainly from highly-urbanized areas whose residents are aghast at any non-city location that isn't pristine wilderness, and think nothing of shutting down 'dirty' industries that employ thousands & make a large contribution to the lifestyles they enjoy.

 

Comments 5 of 11

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.