Outrage at India arrests over Facebook post
In recent months, Indian police have acted against several people for their posts on Facebook or Twitter
The arrest of two women on Monday over a comment on Facebook has sparked off widespread anger in India.
One of the women had criticised the shutdown of Mumbai in her post, after the death of politician Bal Thackeray, while the other "liked" the comment.
The women, accused of "promoting enmity between classes", were released on bail after appearing in court.
The death of the controversial Hindu nationalist politician on Saturday afternoon brought Mumbai to a halt.
In her Facebook comment on Sunday, 21-year-old Shaheen Dhanda wrote: "People like Thackeray are born and die daily and one should not observe a 'bandh' [shutdown] for that."
Her 20-year-old friend Renu Srinivasan 'liked' the status.
'Abuse of authority'The Times of India newspaper responded with the headline: "Shame: 2 girls arrested for harmless online comment."
The newspaper said the arrests were a "clear case of abuse of authority".
"The girl was not slandering anybody, nor was she promoting hatred towards any community".
The newspaper said the charges should be dropped and a case of "wrongful arrest" registered against the police.
Press Council of India Chairman Markandey Katju has written a letter to the Maharashtra Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan criticising the arrests.
"We are living in a democracy, not a fascist dictatorship. In fact, this arrest itself appears to be a criminal act, since... it is a crime to wrongfully arrest or wrongfully confine someone who has committed no crime," Mr Katju, a former Supreme Court judge, said.
Telecommunications Minister Kapil Sibal was quoted as saying by the Press Trust of India news agency that he was "deeply saddened" by the arrests.
"It is their point of view, and enforcement of these laws are not to ban people from expressing their views," he said.
In recent months, police have arrested a number of people in cases which are being seen as a test of India's commitment to freedom of speech.
In October, Ravi Srinivasan, a 46-year-old businessman in the southern Indian city of Pondicherry, was arrested for a tweet criticising Karti Chidambaram, son of Indian Finance Minister P Chidambaram. He was later released on bail.
In September, there was outrage when a cartoonist was jailed in Mumbai on charges of sedition for his anti-corruption drawings. The charges were later dropped.
And in April, the West Bengal government arrested a teacher who had emailed to friends a cartoon that was critical of Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee. He too was later released on bail.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~59~RS~)


India soldiers die in Kashmir ambush
French army begins Mali withdrawal
Foot loose
Tweets of the week
10 things
Red tales
Art over politics
Click
Comment number 83.
HappySnapper2220th November 2012 - 12:58
What I absolutely dont want is the government (any government) being able to regulate the internet or limit free speach. The things the government dont want us to know and say are precisly those things that we need to know most and say loudest.
Link to this (Comment number 83)
Comment number 66.
GKH20th November 2012 - 11:49
This situation is inevitable. As more people gain access to social media sites more opinions will be made. Governments (and not just extreme ones) will no doubt have already realised they and their actions can be questioned and criticised more often, more easily and openly via social media. The rich and powerful, no matter where they are, won't like being 'back chatted' to by us mere mortals.
Link to this (Comment number 66)
Comment number 43.
Bastiat20th November 2012 - 10:23
If you can't even own the words that come out of your mouth, or that you type onto a screen, what can you own?
India's Telecommunications Minister Kapil Sibal has absolutely no idea about individual liberty or freedom of expression. If you want to know who rules you, just ask who you're not allowed to criticise.
Link to this (Comment number 43)
Comment number 34.
ch21ss20th November 2012 - 9:42
The problem is the blurring of public and private comment and between published media and private individuals that make comments that can in theory be read by anyone, although normally only intended for their friends/colleagues. The law and peoples expectations haven't caught up to this reality - a politician should be no more surprised to be attacked on twitter than in a pub, for example.
Link to this (Comment number 34)
Comment number 25.
Muppet Master20th November 2012 - 9:21
Isn't "social media" wonderful. Governments around the world have yet another avenue of control over their citizens. Disagree with their view, and they will arrest you for your opinion. Control-freak heaven
Another reason to aviod, or be very careful them altogether
Link to this (Comment number 25)
Comments 5 of 6