India's billionaires and the wealth of the nation

 
Indian rupees There are 46 billionaires living in India

There were only two billionaires with a combined wealth of $3.2bn (£2.01bn) in India in the mid-1990s.

By 2012, there were 46 of them living in India with a net worth of $176.3bn (£111bn), according to the annual world's billionaires list compiled by Forbes magazine.

The ratio of total wealth of the billionaires to gross domestic product (GDP) - an indicator of how extreme wealth compares with India's growth - rose from around 1% in the mid-1990s to 22% at the peak of the stock market boom in 2008, before dropping to 10% of GDP this year.

So what does this tell us about the nature of the accumulation of wealth in India, one of the world's most unequal nations?

A new paper by Aditi Gandhi of Delhi's Centre for Policy Research and Michael Walton of Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government offers intriguing insights into the social demographics and source of wealth of India's billionaires.

Many economists, Ms Gandhi and Mr Walton point out, find a positive association between growth and self-made billionaire wealth, but a negative one with inherited wealth. "While no causality can be inferred, this is aligned with the view that self-made wealth is more likely to be associated with aggregate economic dynamism," they argue.

Analysing data put out by Forbes, the researchers found that though 21 Indian billionaires are "self-made", 40% of India's total billionaire wealth is owned by the "inherited and growing" category of businessmen.

The caste origins of India's billionaires are on predictable lines: 28 of the 46 billionaires come from traditional merchant classes (Banias, Parsis and Sindhis, for example), and a number of them belong to upper caste communities like Brahmins and Khatris.

A smaller number belong to the lower castes. There is one Muslim billionaire and no Dalit (formerly called untouchables) billionaires.

There is a more significant finding on the origins of billionaire wealth.

A total of 43% of the billionaires, accounting for 60% of billionaire wealth, had their primary - and original - sources of wealth from industries like property development, infrastructure, construction, mining, telecoms, cement and media.

These industries, Ms Gandhi and Mr Walton say, have strong links with the state.

Property development in India, most agree, is India's most shadowy business with a large number of transactions in illegal money on which no tax is paid.

Infrastructure and telecom licenses are typically given out through bids, which are often non-transparent and controversial. (A telecoms scandal rocked India last year). There are allegations of cartels working in the cement industry and sections of the media have been blamed for publishing and broadcasting news for money.

Ms Gandhi and Mr Walton note that all this does not mean that the billionaires acquired wealth through government connections and influence.

"However, it is notable that impressive wealth creation occurred in sectors with substantial potential for rent-extraction and rent-sharing between the private and government players," they say.

Many would say the research shows the two faces of Indian capitalism - like capitalism around the world - where business dynamism and oligarchies go hand in hand. All this can also lead to cronyism, often responsible for economic crises.

Business and the state continue to have tight links in India.

"In the last two to three decades this has bred both impressive business dynamism and even more impressive accumulation of extreme wealth in India. There is a real question as to whether an oligarchic business structure and a corruptible state will lead to the propagation of inequality and create distortions that hurt the growth process," write Ms Gandhi and Mr Walton.

It's a good question. The answer will determine how India tackles inequality.

 
Soutik Biswas Article written by Soutik Biswas Soutik Biswas Delhi correspondent

India's Mars mission: Picture that spoke 1,000 words

One image from the day India put its Mars probe in orbit ended up trending on Twitter and sparked debate about tradition and modernity, says Soutik Biswas.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 36.

    Following on my previous comment, if the caste breakdown of the reporters reveals that lower caste have less representation among BBC reporters and Mr. Biswas also belongs to so-called upper caste then I think a nice gesture from the author would be to leave his position and ask BBC to hire somebody from lower caste for his position. As Gandhi said : "Be the change you wish to see in the world".

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 35.

    For full disclosure, the author must reveal which caste he belongs to and how many Indian reporters employed by BBC including BBC World Service belong to lower castes. He must also reveal how many India correspondents in the past have been of lower caste. Without revealing these stats any numbers that the author shows about lower caste not having enough representation is hypocrisy.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 34.

    The last para reads - "There is a real question as to whether an oligarchic business structure and a corruptible state will lead to the propagation of inequality and create distortions that hurt the growth process," write Ms Gandhi and Mr Walton".

    Ms Gandhi and Mr Walton - Does it apply to US ? - there has been a great stride in inequality there since 1978?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 33.

    #30: India is not Iraq or Iran, has no surplus oil, but great trade opportunity. What makes you think Obama Admin would want to kill the golden goose, upset a compliant Govt, interfere in the domestic policy of a sovereign democratic state (at least on paper), when it can dominate through FDI/FI and global trade with ease?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 32.

    #29: Indian elections are run along Roman war strategy: “bellum se ipsum alet”. Once someone can muster enough to win a seat (20 -80 mn INR per MP?), then the tenure recoups ‘seed capital’, provides next ‘war chest’ and enough for a comfy life for 3-5 generations – much more in subsequent wins. Hence political dynasties, and caste/religion perpetrated for 'divide & rule' advantage.

 

Comments 5 of 36

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.