The myth of the physically unfit Indian
Indians are among the most physically active people in the world
Are Indians some of the most physically unfit people in the world?
Well, doctors will tell you that with the country riding a diabetes and heart disease epidemic, most Indians are physically unfit. As the middle class swells, more Indians are leading desk-bound sedentary lives in cities, where pavements are scarce and there is no culture of walking. Fat-rich diets don't help matters.
But an exhaustive new study by the medical journal Lancet measuring global physical activity explodes the "myth" about the unfit Indian. The study measured physical activity in adults - aged 15 years or older - from 122 countries, comprising over 88% of the world's population.
India, according to the study, is agile and kicking. Only 15.6% of Indians were found to be physically inactive. The British (63.3%), Japanese (60.2%), Italians (54.7%), Irish (53.2%) and Americans (40.5%) were found to be more physically inactive than Indians.
Is it any surprise that Indians appear to be more physically fit than their counterparts in more prosperous parts of the world?
Not really. As the study suggests, physical inactivity is more common in countries of high income than in those of low income. In high income countries, physical activity dwindles as people use more technology and are less engaged in labour-intensive work.
In India, where the overwhelming majority of people are engaged in back-breaking farming, it is little wonder that they are more physically active than their counterparts in more prosperous countries.
More women (18.4%) in India were found to be more physically inactive than men (12.7%), perhaps pointing to a society moored in traditions where men work and women look after the home.
So which, according to the Lancet study, is the most physically active country in the world?
No prizes for guessing this, but yes, it is Bangladesh where only 4.7% are physically unfit.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~43~RS~)




Pakistani politician is shot dead
Patience of Job
Tweets of the week
Clocking out
The real Sir Alex
Story of the S-Class
Fast Track
Comment number 35.
ripink24th July 2012 - 22:07
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Link to this (Comment number 35)
Comment number 34.
ripink24th July 2012 - 21:05
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Link to this (Comment number 34)
Comment number 33.
Jesús A Bermúdez-Silva24th July 2012 - 19:50
Good for the Indians
Link to this (Comment number 33)
Comment number 32.
Icebloo24th July 2012 - 19:42
Well they have an incredible economy which means they have more desk jobs and less manual jobs PLUS the UK sends them MILLIONS of pounds in aid (even though their economy is better than ours) so they have a wonderfully easy life don't they ? They just sit back and watch the cash roll in ....
Link to this (Comment number 32)
Comment number 31.
Mangesh24th July 2012 - 18:08
The BBC and all the readers are unfathomably insistent on glorifying poverty. All the poor people in world DON'T live in India (like all drug addicts don't live in Britain). The lifestyle of engaging in some keeps Indians fit. For the surprise of Britons, Indians dont mind losing their annual leaves. Being an Indian (and not very poor), would love to work 6-7 days a week, if that keeps me busy.
Link to this (Comment number 31)
Comments 5 of 35