Is IPL a 'crony league'?

Shah Rukh Khan at Wankhede stadium Shah Rukh Khan has defended his actions after reports of a scuffle at the Wankhede stadium

Related Stories

The Indian Premier League's (IPL) ongoing fifth season has turned out to be the most closely fought one so far. But, off the field, it has also been the most controversial.

A bunch of young IPL cricketers were suspended after they were stung by a news channel talking about alleged under-the-table transactions and spot fixing taking place in the league.

An allegedly inebriated Bollywood superstar, who owns a league team had a dust-up with security officials at a Mumbai stadium when they stopped him from marching into the field with a group of children after his team won a match.

Two cricketers were detained at a rave party in Mumbai, where many were suspected to be taking drugs. As if this was not enough, an Australian cricketer playing in the league was accused of molesting a woman and assaulting her male companion, prompting some uncharitable tweeting by the son of the owner of the team to which the cricketer belongs. (The woman has since withdrawn the complaint.)

Has all this prompted historian Ramachandra Guha to launch a scathing critique of the league, one of the most thriving sporting events in the world today?

Author of a magisterial book on the history of Indian cricket, Mr Guha is a devout follower of the great game. But in a piece in Friday's The Hindu newspaper, he skewers the league, saying it is bad for capitalism, democracy and cricket, in no particular order.

Supporters of the league - and they, I suspect, are the majority - argue that how players conduct themselves off the field has little to do with the league.

So what is wrong with the IPL, according to Mr Guha?

Many things, clearly. Mr Guha has never been a fan of the Twenty20 format of the game and its crude aesthetic, and has written about it in the past. This time he goes beyond the format and "boorish celebrities", arguing why the league is bad news for India.

'Bad name'

He writes that player prices don't reflect their worth accurately, foreign players are paid a fraction of their Indian counterparts of comparable quality.

He talks about the brazen cronyism: the chief of India's powerful and rich cricket board is the owner of a league team - imagine Alex Ferguson was the manager of Manchester United and the chief of the English Football Association - and the league commissioner is seen openly hobnobbing with some team owners.

Many of India's top former cricketers have been hired on as consultants and commentators, who have nothing critical to say or offer any suggestions to make the league more transparent. Mr Guha believes IPL has actually given "capitalism and entrepreneurship a bad name".

A lot of cricket lovers would agree with Mr Guha. IPL, they believe, is Indian cronyism at its shining and vulgar best, where cricket and Bollywood combine in a heady and, as many say, a toxic cocktail.

Chennai Super Kings" Dwayne Bravo bats during an Indian Premier League cricket match against Kings XI Punjab in Dharmsala, India, Thursday, May 17, 2012. The fifth season has been a closely fought one on field

More interestingly, Mr Guha makes the case that the IPL is bad for Indian democracy as well. He says it underlines the divide between rich and poor India. The names of the teams - "kings, royals, knights" - reveal a lack of imagination and a sloven admiration for colonial and aristocratic titles.

He says the country's largest state, Uttar Pradesh, also a nursery of Indian cricket, has not even been awarded a franchise. Bihar, Orissa and Madhya Pradesh, which are among India's largest states, have also been left out. To call such an exclusionary league Indian is a folly, he suggests.

Mr Guha is not the only cricket fan who appears to be fed up with the excesses and opacity of the league. Mukul Kesavan, historian and writer of a fine book on cricket, says IPL is "republican India's first public celebration of decadence".

Argues Mr Kesavan sharply: "One characteristic feature of decadence is a contempt for convention and procedural scruple. Indians are familiar with this in everyday life, but the IPL is a departure in that the people involved with it legitimise and defend conflicts of interest explicitly and in full public view."

It is difficult to disagree. Some of India's finest commentators are attached to the IPL, and no one says a thing about the conflict of interests, the open involvement of cricket board officials with the franchises and the complete lack of transparency.

As long as the tamasha (spectacle in Hindi) of cricket as entertainment is pulling in the crowds, everything else is forgotten? Does it mean that an expensively-mounted cricket spectacle makes Indians forget all that is wrong with their country?

Soutik Biswas Article written by Soutik Biswas Soutik Biswas Delhi correspondent

Why India gang-rape film row is extraordinary

A documentary by a British film-maker on the 2012 gang rape and murder of a female student in Delhi kicks up a storm in India.

Read full article

More on This Story

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 5.

    Going by authors logic, EPL must be the croniest league of all..
    IPL players still can't hold a candle to EPL players when it comes to bad behaviour. Nothing beats banging brother's wife or two/three timing on their wags not even taking drugs, not that I condone drugs use.
    The author last time around claimed IPL-5 was a failure just 5-6 games into the season. Now comes up this bit of trash.

  • rate this

    Comment number 4.

    What a shock a sporting /major world event that has dodgy goings on.

    They should be more like Sepp Blatter
    Azerbijan Eurovision
    Or the olympics sponsor not allowing anyone to use another brand.

  • rate this

    Comment number 3.

    IPL - it's shocking that we Indians are NOT ashamed of what's happening in the name of the glorious game of Cricket! Both Mukul Kesavan and Ramachandra Guha have diagnosed the malaise perfectly. Now, it's for the people involved in organizing and running this 'tamasha' to introspect and get out of this once and for all. If the idea of Twenty20 itself is bad, the IPL is obnoxious. Quit!

  • rate this

    Comment number 2.

    Can somebody please explain how a cricket association is responsible for what players do off the field? Does anybody blame the FA Cup organizers or the Olympic Committee if a participant misbehaves in private life? If the answer is no, why are these so called pundits blaming the IPL? Amazing logic.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1.

    My supporting details have already been written into your article.


Page 2 of 2



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.