Is bad politics ruining India?

 
Indian snake charmer in Jaipur - 8 April 2010

Is India losing its mojo because of bad politics?

It's an obvious question to ask at a time when powerful - and populist - regional parties are again flexing their muscles at a fickle federal government, key economic reforms are seemingly stuck in the bog of messy coalition politics, and the government is struggling under an avalanche of corruption charges. Economic growth and investment have cooled and inflation remains high.

So is it surprising that The Economist magazine, in its latest issue, says the politics is "preventing India from fulfilling its vast economic potential"?

Or when Fareed Zakaria, editor-at-large with Time magazine, tells an audience in Delhi this week that India's politicians are "out of touch… they try to portray India as a victim, not the victor".

With uncharacteristic exaggeration, The Economist even invokes a return to the stifling days of the controlled economy.

"Lately, like a Bollywood villain who just refuses to die, the old India has made a terrifying reappearance," says the magazine. It blames a "nastily divisive political climate" for the crisis and believes that India requires "energetic, active leaders, plus politicians who are ready to compromise".

'Corrupt and corroded'

Both the magazine and the pundit are right and wrong.

Start Quote

Reformers need to be patient; there are no shortcuts in India”

End Quote

The quality of India's politicians, many argue, has declined drastically, as in many parts of the world. Most of them seem to be out of sync with modern day realities - expectations have fallen so ridiculously low that an iPad carrying politician is described by the media as a modern one!

Most are also seen as greedy, corrupt and disinterested in serious reform. The increasing number of politicians with criminal records and the brazen use of money to buy party tickets and bribe voters erodes India's ailing democratic process.

It is not a happy picture. "Today the Centre is corrupt and corroded," historian Ramachandra Guha wrote recently. "There are allegedly 'democratic' politicians who abuse their oath of office and work only to enrich themselves; as well as self-described 'revolutionaries' who seek to settle arguments by the point of the gun." Only serious electoral reform can ensure a better breed of politician.

But to believe that less politics is good economics is a bit fey. There is little evidence to argue that political instability has been bad for India's economy.

India's first flush of economic reforms was launched by a minority government headed by PV Narasimha Rao of the Congress party in the early 1990s. The reforms spluttered to a halt when the government secured a majority.

Later, a rag-tag 13-party coalition United Front government helmed by two prime ministers in 18 months in the mid-1990s undertook significant reforms, slashing taxes, deregulating interest rates and moving towards capital account convertibility.

One study by Kausik Chaudhuri and Sugato Dasgupta actually found that more investments take place when coalition governments are in power, one of the reasons being various regional interests are held together by "generous distribution of infrastructure projects". Economist Surjit Bhalla has argued that political instability is actually good for economic reforms.

"The contention is that lack of political dominance means that politicians in power will make the extra reform in order to fight for marginal votes in a future election," he has said. "And if political stability is present, the politicians are unlikely to make an effort because of their inherent short sightedness or complacence."

Elitist biases

The problem, as Paranjoy Guha Thakurtha and Shankar Raghuraman argue succinctly in a study of coalition politics in India, is that privatisation - a key aspect of economic reforms - remains a dirty word with most of India's politicians, trade unionists and opinion makers.

There is still a serious lack of political consensus on issues like foreign investment, lowering interest rates on deposits in pension funds and privatising profit-making state-run factories.

Public consensus is harder to come by in an awfully unequal society where the middle class and the rich root for further opening up of the economy, while the poor want the state to invest in health and education and check corruption. The elitist biases in public policy is made easier by a poorly-informed and often unlettered electorate with low expectations.

Many would argue that India never got any magic going, so there is no question of losing it.

Consensus is painfully slow in such a society, and sometimes only a crisis can provoke the government - and the people - to bite the bullet. Reformers need to be patient; there are no shortcuts in India.

 
Soutik Biswas Article written by Soutik Biswas Soutik Biswas Delhi correspondent

Did Kashmir 'abandon' its flood-hit people?

Omar Abdullah says the government was caught off-guard, but the BBC's Soutik Biswas considers whether Kashmir could have learned lessons from other Indian states' flood response.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 37.

    Correction to my post #35.
    That salary analogy can "justify" lack of accountability, professionalism & productivity to almost everyone in India- starting from sweeper, drivers, teachers, professors to Presidents!
    I'm not sure how many PMs, Ministers & MPs in developed countries have bank accounts in tax heavens (e.g Swiss Banks) and how they are treated for having "extra" money in such accounts!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 36.

    Indian Members of Parliaments (MP) are no less expensive as compared to many developed countries with much higher per capita GDP. Check it- "With pay hike, an MP to cost Rs 37L a year" http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-08-21/india/28313978_1_indian-mps-constituency-allowance-three-fold-hike. "An (Indian) MP is worth more than Rs 20 lakh annually, higher than an MP in Singapore"!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 35.

    @ Chopra (#34). That is old comparison & cliche. That salary analogy to almost everyone, starting from sweeper to professor to PM. We also need to keep in mind that Indian fixes Rs ~6000 annual income as "poverty line", while US has $22,350 (Rs 11,17,500) annual income for a family of 4.
    In India, almost none takes responsibility of a decision- from the very bottom till the very top!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 34.

    Keep in mind these facts: India's prime minister's salary - $32,000/Year, Prime Ministers of Singapore @ $ 4 million, Australia @ $500,000, US president $400,000/year for life + life protection for life. I wonder what the minister's get? Let us get real - BBC and Economist!!!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 33.

    Economic reforms are stuck because the government is struggling under an avalanche of corruption charges. The decisions made under different circumstances are being questions and painted with the broad brush of corruptions. Leaders are spending their time and energy in reviewing and re-reviewing instead of making decisions and facing elections based on those decisions. Media needs to examine!!!

 

Comments 5 of 37

 

Features

  • Children in Africa graphicBaby steps

    Why are more children in Africa living beyond five?


  • Olive oil and olivesFood myth

    Did 1950s Britain get its olive oil from a pharmacy?


  • Rio Ferdinand and David Moyes'Playing to win'

    Memorable quotes from sporting autobiographies BBC Sport


  • Hand washing to contain Ebola in LiberiaEbola virus

    More action is needed to tackle Ebola, say experts


  • shadow of people kissing on grassOutdoor love

    Should the police intervene when people have sex in public?


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.