Salman Rushdie pull out: A stain on India?

 
File picture taken on 19 February 1999 Indian Muslims burn an effigy of Indian-born British author Salman Rushdie. Mr Rushdie sparked anger in the Muslim world with his book The Satanic Verses

Two years ago, Salman Rushdie said he was worried about a rising "culture of complaint" in India.

Speaking at a media conclave in Delhi, he referred to the case of the late artist MF Husain. Bigots had vandalised the painter's works, threatened him and literally drove him out of India. He lived in exile in Qatar and died in London last year.

"This is the proud face of a philistine India," the author had said.

"There is nothing wrong in not liking his art. You can easily opt out. A painting is a finite space of art. If it offends, don't enter that space. The best way to avoid getting offended is to shut a book… The worst thing is that artists are soft targets… We don't have armies protecting us."

Salman Rushdie, who lived in hiding under police protection for many years after the fatwa issued in 1989 against him by Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini, may have been prescient.

He has now pulled out from the lJaipur Literary Festival, Asia's largest, after intelligence sources informed him that paid assassins might try to kill him. Sensibly, he decided to stay at home.

Author Hari Kunzru tweeted that his absence from the festival is "a stain on India's international reputation".

To be sure, this time the threats to Salman Rushdie by Muslim groups may have arisen from petty political compulsions.

But none of India's main political parties, including the ruling Congress party, spoke out against clerics and fringe groups. Critics say they fear offending Muslim voters that they are all trying to woo in crucial state elections in Uttar Pradesh next month.

The failure of the state to secure Salman Rushdie's protection, many believe, is a shameful indictment of India's politicians and their opportunistic politics of least resistance.

It also raises some fundamental questions: Is an increasingly prosperous India becoming more intolerant? Or have religious groups and politicians, in pandering to religions and identities, failed to move with the times? I fear that the answers to both are partly in the affirmative.

India is a grimy example of how bad politics hurts freedom of speech. Whether Salman Rushdie's staying away from Jaipur will fetch Muslim votes for parties is not clear. But what is clear that it sets a dreadful precedent for its artists who are deemed by religious groups to be producing "blasphemous" material.

Freedom of speech, most democrats believe, is non-negotiable and should come without caveats and not be held hostage to fringe groups or the whimsies of politicians.

If India fails to protect this essential freedom, they say, it has no business to call itself a thriving democracy. As analyst Salil Tripathi says: "Writers should not need armies to protect them in a free society. That Rushdie might need protection in India reflects poorly - not on him, but on India."

 
Soutik Biswas Article written by Soutik Biswas Soutik Biswas Delhi correspondent

Atul Gawande: What ails India's public health system

Surgeon-writer Atul Gawande says India's health system is one of the "most complex things" in the world, with excellent doctors tripped up by dysfunctional systems.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 54.

    Literature or any form of Art must not be used to offend peoples sentiments specially when they are based on lies as in the case of Satanic Verses.Criticising a community could be tolerated but rediculing Holy figures and Prophets must not be included in freedom of expresiion . Its a hypocricy that Antisemitism is banned but Islamophobia is promoted in the name of "freedom of expression

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 53.

    1.Its not a "lunatic fringe" that oppose Salman Rashdie but the whole community of 200 million indian muslim and 1800 million world muslims are offended by Rushdie's book .

    2. Media and politicians have blown up this issue : Media has blown it to get some spicy news and Politicians ,to take some gain out of it for coming assembly polls (sply in U.P.)

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 52.

    "Rajasthan Police lied": http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Rajasthan-Police-lied-tweets-Rushdie-Gehlot-fumes/articleshow/11589594.cms
    Indian politicians need to understand that such alleged false accusations do serious harm to Muslim community. Such acts might give some temporary relief to Govt but will lead to bigger problem to both Govt and Muslim community in the future.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 51.

    If Indian politicians fail to condemn such behaviour for fear of losing votes, this is an arguably rational response to an irrational electorate. Religion encourages conduct based not on reason but belief. This in turn encourages demonstrably unreasonable conduct on the basis that it offends one's beliefs.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 50.

    This author is spot on and his topic couldn't be more pertinent to our times. With all the global and national problems around, the right of one intellectual to travel abroad and meet other intellectuals in nice, fancy residences and five star hotels must be upheld by every Indian. Jai Elites

 

Comments 5 of 54

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.