Rahul Dravid's recipe for reforming cricket

Rahul Dravid Rahul Dravid is a thinking cricketer

When Rahul Dravid talks, people listen.

The star batsman has always been a thinking, introspective sportsman. With a staggering 24,000 runs in Tests and one-day games under his belt, 38-year-old Dravid is also eminently qualified to talk about the future of cricket.

So when Dravid delivered a luminous speech at the Bradman Oration lecture this week in Australia, the cricketing world stood up and listened.

Cricket, Dravid rightly said, faces huge challenges.

In India, the mecca of the game, empty stands stared at the players during the recent series against England and West Indies. Dravid said he saw empty stands at a one-day international in India for the first time in the past 30 years - India has played 227 one-day internationals at home since 1981 - during the October series against England.

"It was called the 'revenge' series, meant to wipe away the memory of a forgettable tour of England. India kept winning every game, and yet the stands did not fill up. Five days after a 5-0 victory, 95,000 [people] turned up to watch India's first Formula 1 race," Dravid said.

A few weeks later, against the West Indies, the stands got emptier, till the tour reached the smaller cities which see few international games.

'Listen to the fan'

Dravid believes that too much cricket and spectator fatigue alone do not explaining the dwindling crowds.

Cricket, like most sports, needs a context and this has been often missing in India's crowded cricketing calendar, brimming over with inconsequential, uneven games.

Where was the context in the India-England one-day series when the two countries had played each other in four Tests and five one-day internationals just weeks before?

"Whatever the reasons are - maybe it is too much cricket or too little by way of comfort for spectators - the fan has sent us a message and we must listen," said Dravid.

"This is not mere sentimentality. Empty stands do not make for good television. Bad television can lead to a fall in ratings, the fall in ratings will be felt by media planners and advertisers."

India vs West Indies Test match in Mumbai in November 2011 An empty stand in Mumbai during last month's series against West Indies

India provides 70% of cricket's revenue but let us not get giddy over its fine financial health. Let us not forget the fan from whom the game derives its financial heft.

"They deserve our respect and let us not take them for granted. Disrespecting the fan is disrespecting the game," Dravid said.

There are recurring concerns over the health of the one-day game, though it got a great boost after India lifted the World Cup. And purists believe that a glut of Twenty20 is wrecking the game's aesthetics.

But it's not all gloom and doom, Dravid suggests. All three formats can coexist peacefully. But, he adds carefully, cricket needs to find a middle path.

It must scale down this "mad merry-go-round" that players find themselves in: a shallow two-Test series with seven ODIs and a few Twenty20 games thrown in, for example.

So first things first. Protect Test cricket, implores Dravid. Explore day-night Tests. Seriously plan for a world Test championship, making it the marquee event in the format. Play more Tests in smaller cities and revive old venues to generate more interest.

"Meaningless" one-day cricket doesn't escape Dravid's unrelenting gaze. Slash useless games without any context. Make sure that all 50-over games are in the build-up for big International Cricket Council (ICC) tournaments like Champions Trophy and World Cup.

And the best way to make sure that Twenty20 - is this Dravid's bete noire? - doesn't run amok and ruin the game, he suggests that the format is best served by thriving domestic leagues.

Listen to Dravid carefully and you sense his anxiousness about the future of Test cricket. For a man often regarded as the 134-year-old format's last classical batsman, this is expected.

Test cricket deserves to be fiercely protected, he says. No serious follower of the game would disagree.

"Where I come from, nation versus nation is what got people interested in cricket in the first place. When I hear the news that a country is playing without some of its best players, I always wonder, what do their fans think?"

Well, in this age of many distractions, many of us fans would turn away from the game. Are the authorities listening?

Soutik Biswas Article written by Soutik Biswas Soutik Biswas Delhi correspondent

India's Arvind Kejriwal makes an epic comeback

Written off by his rivals and the media, India's most famous anti-corruption campaigner has bounced back.

Read full article


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 10.

    even though rahul dravid is one sensible criketer that India has produced and even though cricket is a gentlemans game, it is not worth a discussion as only a handful benefit and the rest are not even guaranteed to watch when they can afford to pay for tickets.

    there are more important and pressing items in India's agenda that cricket.

  • rate this

    Comment number 9.

    This is a matter of marketing! I agree with (No.6) and cricket should look to baseball and US sport in general - they know how to make a spectacle. One-day cricket is dead. Fans want excitement and 20/20 provides it as well as a better way to bring people into the game. Start promoting what makes Cricket great - History, Technicality, Strategy, Immense Concentration - within the 5-day format.

  • rate this

    Comment number 8.

    All the points that Dravid makes make sense however the administrators have already entered into a long-term contract with satellite TV and advertisers world wide.

    I love cricket from grass roots up but I fear that by the time action is taken it will be too late and the needs of nations to fund their own businesses will exceed to the greater good.

  • rate this

    Comment number 7.

    I really believe that Dravid (who is clearly a thoughtful individual and strongly positioned to make constructive remarks) pretty much hits the nail on the head. Rather than quibbling - people who see Cricket as a the great sport that it is - should try and rally around these concepts.

  • rate this

    Comment number 6.

    Twenty20 should be organised the same way as baseball in the US and Japan - when two teams meet they should play 5 matches over 5 consecutive evenings as a mini series. Less travel for players and fans can then both attend a game or games in person and watch the other games live on TV. Why not try it?


Comments 5 of 10



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.