Is India's identity number scheme unravelling?

 
UID number being taken in India India plans to issue 600 million identity numbers in five years

Is India's showpiece multi-billion-dollar unique identification number (UID) programme unravelling?

Using biometric methods, including an iris scan, the scheme is logging details of India's population on a central database. Over five years, India plans to issue 600 million UID numbers.

The programme's aim is laudable. The identity number will help the poor, who find it difficult to access public services and benefits because they do not have official records or identity.

By one estimate, 80% of Indians don't have bank accounts; and only 60 million people have a Permanent Account Number or PAN, the sole identification number used during bank transactions.

But two years after it launched, a parliamentary committee has given a thumbs-down to the setting up of a statutory National Identification Authority to bolster the scheme. A bill had been introduced in parliament last December to set up the authority.

The committee, in a recent report, raised concerns about access and misuse of personal information, surveillance, profiling and securing confidential information by the government. UID authorities say that appropriate steps have been taken to ensure security and protection of data.

That's not all. There appears to be a valid concern about the possibility of illegal residents getting identification numbers. (The number is not proof of citizenship or residency. It only confirms identity after authentication.)

The parliamentary committee fears that "at a time when the country is facing a serious problem of illegal immigrants and infiltration from across the border", the number was being given out to every resident. "The committee is unable to understand the rationale for expanding the scheme to persons who are not citizens," the report said.

The committee has even questioned the implementation of the scheme, which has been held up as a success story by the authorities. It says it was originally meant for the poorest of the poor and then extended to all residents. But the committee says better-off Indians already possess many other forms of identity, and so asks how the number helps them. Authorities say the number will be a general proof of identity.

Also, the report wonders, how will the poorest of the poor be given numbers? For one, the authorities don't have proper data on the very poor - officially, 37% of India's 1.2 billion people live below the poverty line. But there are various estimates of the exact number of poor in India and one suggests that the true figure could be as high as 77%. So how does the number help in identifying the genuine beneficiaries?

Interestingly, the report points to the shelving of a similar identity project in the UK because of the huge costs, unreliable and untested technology and the risks to the safety and security of citizens. A London School of Economics report says that the UK project could turn out to be a "potential danger to the public interest and to the legal rights of the individuals".

Nandan Nilekani, head of the Unique Identification Authority of India, believes that the number can transform Indian politics by curbing theft and leakage of public funds. "It would make porous distribution mechanisms and our dependence on the moral scruples of the bureaucrats redundant," he says. But, clearly, a number of crucial questions need to be clarified before India can continue to crunch out the identity numbers.

 
Soutik Biswas Article written by Soutik Biswas Soutik Biswas Delhi correspondent

Atul Gawande: What ails India's public health system

Surgeon-writer Atul Gawande says India's health system is one of the "most complex things" in the world, with excellent doctors tripped up by dysfunctional systems.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 17.

    one would have thought that the overall benefit of implementing an UID scheme outweighs the potential costs (in Rupees and personal freedoms); with a 1,200m plus population, India could probably do with a mechanism to facilitate sensible administration of the country and resource usage planning.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 16.

    This hugely expensive project is (was?) a win-win for many: including IT & hardware companies & politicians. In India, most of the grant proposals & projects are reviewed mainly by the people who are directly benefited/affected from/by the project. If an otherwise great (for country) bill/project does not benefit those concerned people it will be either rejected or delayed (e.g Jan Lokpal).

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 15.

    Will Indian parliament (in states and central) will pass a bill or resolution to suspend and punish any elected public representative AND public servant who recommend issuing such ID document(s) to any Indian or immigrant resident breaking or by-passing the law? Most of the time, issue of such fake or multiple ID documents are supported by corrupt police/bureaucrat &/or politicians with impunity.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 14.

    I am not much convinced that in a country where passports (besides Personal Identification Number, PIN) are issued multiple times to single individuals, where illegal immigrants can easily get it (leave alone ration card, most widely used ID document), how this UID will ensure it's not misused?
    Technology alone can't solve problems unless its use & implementation is made accountable.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 13.

    I am not sure why the project is reviewed only after two years of its existence and after millions of rupees already spent! Why the project and its feasibility were not studied, by neutral and competent authority (besides Govt and IT professionals- who surely have own interest to get it passed) before it was given green signal? This is just another example how Indian govt acts- on ad-hoc basis.

 

Comments 5 of 17

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.