China morning round-up: Diplomatic row on air quality

A cleaner wears a face mask as she works in front of Tiananmen Gate in Beijing Official comments on China's air pollution appeared to be aimed at the US

China's request for foreign embassies and consulates to refrain from publishing their own air quality monitoring data has become a hot topic for Chinese newspapers. However, how they wrote about it varies significantly.

Vice Minister for Environmental Protection Wu Xiaoqing first made the comment on Tuesday morning, followed by an reiteration by the foreign ministry's spokesman later in the day.

The comments appeared aimed at the US embassy, which puts out its own figures on pollution levels in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, even though the officials did not specifically name the US.

The US embassy in Beijing has a monitoring station on its roof and publishes the results hourly on the internet.

China Daily, without mentioning the US, says that the practice is "breaking rules" and is "contravening international conventions".

Shanghai Daily says Mr Wu has told foreign embassies and consulates to "keep quite" on air quality, as the paper points out that US consulates in Shanghai and Guangzhou are also running the same service monitoring fine particulates known as PM2.5 in the air.

Beijing News and Guangzhou's Southern Metropolis Daily say that China "hopes" that foreign embassies can "stop" publishing their own data.

But the Beijing Times and People's Daily Overseas Edition state specifically that China is asking the US to stop doing so.

The Global Times says that even as US embassy spokesman Richard Buangan told the paper that the embassy's data is for the use of their own staff, they also made them available to other US citizens.

Citing both Mr Wu and his superior, environment minister Zhou Shengxian, China Youth Daily says the row was caused by the fact that the US is evaluating their results using higher domestic standards.

Mr Zhou told a conference in Beijing that China's latest standard on fine particulates in the air met the minimum recommended level by the World Health Organization.

The bilingual editorial of the Global Times says that "the US embassy is involving itself in a contentious domestic issue, and continues to do so".

"It is pressing China to accept an action in violation of diplomatic treaties. Chinese authorities should negotiate with the US embassy. It is also in the interests of broader China-US relations," it added.

But the headlines of the editorial differ. The English edition says the row "shows need for government credibility [from China]", while the Chinese edition requests the US "to give positive response to the ministry's appeal".

Hong Kong's Ming Pao Daily News points out that Wu Xiaoqing's comment has met "fierce attack" on the internet, as some Chinese netizens criticised Beijing for "monopolising the air".

At the US State Department's daily press briefing on Tuesday, spokesman Mark Toner said the department did not believe the pollution monitoring reports violated either Chinese laws or the Vienna Convention, and that the embassy would continue to release them.

More on This Story

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

More China stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

  • Pilots who survived WWII crash on glacierDisaster on ice Watch

    Incredible survival story of WWII crash pilots who beat Arctic winter


  • Michael HastingsRenegade reporter

    Divisive legacy of Rolling Stone journalist Michael Hastings


  • Peanut butter sandwichBad tip?

    Readers' tipping nightmares and fairytales


  • Worshipper at Mount OlympusYe gods

    The Greeks who want to bring back Zeus


Elsewhere on the BBC

  • Low cost carriersBudget boom

    What are the secrets of success of low-cost airlines Ryanair and Easyjet?

Programmes

  • Michael HanekeTalking Movies Watch

    Documentary probes the enigma of Amour film-maker Michael Haneke

BBC © 2013 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.