Japan cabinet approves landmark military change

Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe speaks during a press conference at the prime minister's official residence in Tokyo, on 15 May Mr Abe has said Japan must change to adapt to a new security environment

Related Stories

Japan's cabinet has approved a landmark change in security policy, paving the way for its military to fight overseas.

Under its constitution, Japan is barred from using force to resolve conflicts except in cases of self-defence.

But a reinterpretation of the law will now allow "collective self-defence" - using force to defend allies under attack.

PM Shinzo Abe has been pushing hard for the move, arguing Japan needs to adapt to a changing security environment.

"No matter what the circumstances, I will protect Japanese people's lives and peaceful existence," he told journalists after the change was approved.

The decision must be passed by parliament, which the ruling bloc controls. But by reinterpreting rather than revising the constitution, Mr Abe avoids the need for a public referendum.

The US - with whom Japan has a decades-old security alliance - will welcome the move, but it will anger China, with whom Japan's ties are already very strained.

The decision is also highly controversial in a nation where post-war pacifist identify is firmly entrenched.

On Sunday a man set himself on fire in central Tokyo to protest against the change.

A protester shows "No War" sign on her palms during a rally in front of the prime minister"s official residence in Tokyo on July 1, 2014. Several thousand people protested against the change on Monday
'No recovery'

Mr Abe first endorsed the move in May, after a panel of his advisers released a report recommending changes to defence laws.

Japan adopted its pacifist constitution after its surrender in World War Two. Since then, its troops have not engaged in combat, although small numbers have taken part in UN peace-keeping operations.

What is collective self-defence?
  • In the past Japan could use force only in self-defence. Under the proposed change, Japan's military will be able to come to the aid of allies if they come under attack from a common enemy
  • Other conditions would apply, according to reports, including that there should be a clear threat to the Japanese state and that people's right to life and liberty could be subverted
  • Examples from officials of "collective self-defence" could include Japan shooting down a missile fired by North Korea at the US and Japan taking part in mine-sweeping operations in key sea lanes during a conflict
  • Japan's PM says the change does not mean taking part in multilateral wars, like the US-led war in Iraq

It has long held the view that under international law, it has the right to collective self-defence, but - until today - said it could not exercise that right because of constitutional limits.

Mr Abe emphasised that the change would not lead to involvement in foreign wars.

"There is a misunderstanding that Japan will be involved in war in an effort to defend a foreign country, but this is out of the question," he told the press conference.

"It will be strictly a defensive measure to defend our people. We will not resort to the use of force in order to defend foreign forces."

On Monday, thousands of people joined a protest in Tokyo to oppose the change.

Critics of Mr Abe fear that this move is the first step to a more permanent revision or removal of the war-renouncing Article 9 of the constitution.

"I thought that if we don't stop the Abe government now then it won't be possible to recover," Etsuo Nakashima, 32, told Reuters news agency.

But others believe that the constitution is a post-war relic imposed on Japan by the US that restricts it from engaging in the normal activities of a modern nation.

China - with whom Japan is currently engaged in a bitter territorial dispute - says it opposes the change, accusing Japan of "remilitarising" under Mr Abe.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said that the new policy "raises doubts about Japan's approach to peaceful development", and accused Japan of "hyping the China threat".

"We urge Japan to sincerely respect the rightful concerns of neighbouring Asian countries, diligently solve any related issues, and not affect China's rights and the stability of the region," he said.

South Korea has also raised objections, saying it will "not tolerate" the move which it said was made without South Korea's agreement.

The foreign ministry also urged Japan to ensure regional peace and stability.


More on This Story

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 170.

    Asia is becoming the global economic centre of power & it would appear Japan is taking steps to ensure that any imbalance this creates in national relationships can be countered with the threat of military force.

    The political & social outlook in the region is varied which potentially leads to the alignment of nations that were previously unthinkable.

  • rate this

    Comment number 141.

    Japan has no choice but to step up to the plate , place the country in a position to better defend themselves. The world has not put North Korea or China in check.

    History will show, placing your head in the sand and hope it will be ok does not work well.

  • rate this

    Comment number 23.

    This is a dangerous move for the region. One cannot blames countries like China and South Korea as well as others in the region reacts angrily, given the suffering they had the hands of the last Japanese built up and aggression. Regardless of the political system in China, there're overwhelming number of Chinese, including Koreans who're against this and rightly so.

  • rate this

    Comment number 21.

    While we should never forget our past, it should not be a shackle on the future.

    I'm sure Japan will use this new power sensibly.

  • rate this

    Comment number 16.

    If nations are set on intervention then it should be through humanitarian assistance, economic support and political partnership, not militarily.


Comments 5 of 7


More Asia stories



  • Mukesh SinghNo remorse

    Delhi bus rapist says victim shouldn't have fought back

  • Aimen DeanI spied

    The founder member of al-Qaeda who worked for MI6

  • Before and after shotsPerfect body

    Just how reliable are 'before and after' photos?

  • Woman with closed eyeStrange light show

    What do you see when you close your eyes?

  • Sony WalkmanLost ideas

    What has happened to Japan's inventors?

Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.