Afghan President Karzai dismisses 'al-Qaeda comeback'

 

Mr Karzai, in his interview with the BBC's Lyse Doucet, was critical of President George W Bush's "war on terror"

Afghan President Hamid Karzai has dismissed the possibility of al-Qaeda linked groups making a comeback in his country in a similar way to Iraq.

Asked by the BBC's Lyse Doucet in Kabul whether what was happening in Iraq could happen in Afghanistan, the president replied: "Never, not at all."

The outgoing president said that al-Qaeda had no presence in Afghanistan.

Nato troops withdraw from Afghanistan at the end of 2014. Some commentators have warned of an increase in violence.

'Continued international support'

President Karzai said that he was in regular dialogue with the Taliban - "[They] are in contact with me every day," he said.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai Every morning Hamid Karzai walks to his office in the presidential compound in Kabul, surrounded by body guards and armoured vehicles
Hamid Karzai with a member of his young family Mr Karzai is preparing to move out of the presidential palace with his young family
Hamid Karzai sits at his desk in June 2014 The outgoing Afghan president says he is in regular dialogue with the Taliban

"There is even an exchange of letters, meetings, and desire for peace.

"[But they were] not able to bring peace on their own, just like I and the Afghan people and government were unable to bring peace on their own."

Afghans voted in run-off polls in the presidential election on 14 June. Mr Karzai is expected to hand power to his successor in August.

He said his country needed continued international support where it did not have the means to sustain itself.

Succession battle

But Mr Karzai said that the key thing when it came to the protection of Afghanistan was the work of Afghans.

Our correspondent says that the Afghan government has refused to take up a US offer of a strategic pact with the US after 2014.

However, the two men vying to succeed him as president - former Foreign Minister Abdullah Abdullah and ex-World Bank economist Ashraf Ghani - have both said that they will sign such a deal.

That could help Afghanistan avoid some of the worst of what is happening in Iraq, our correspondent says.

line

Unsigned security deal - main points

Jurisdiction: US forces remaining after 2014 reportedly to receive immunity from Afghan courts

Sovereignty: In October 2013, President Karzai appeared to have secured US agreement not to carry out attacks on Afghan soil without first consulting the Afghan authorities

Security: The US said in October 2013 that it would not protect Afghanistan from external attack because it could get mired in a war with Pakistan

Q&A: Foreign forces in Afghanistan

line

The president said that he was convinced that previous US President George W Bush's "war on terror" in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks in 2001 should not have been fought in Afghan villages and homes.

In an apparent reference to Pakistan, he said it should have been prosecuted in "sanctuaries beyond our borders."

"I believe that the war on terror was not fought with honesty and not fought genuinely," he said. "The consequences are being felt across the region."

Mr Karzai, who has served two terms as Afghanistan's first and only president since the Taliban were ousted from power in 2001, is obliged by law to stand down after the latest election.

 

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 286.

    That is totally unreal.

    Just look at Iraq, right NOW! You see exactly what is going to happen, when we pull out of Afghanistan.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 211.

    I be glad to see the back of this man. The sooner he leaves office the better. Most people are fully aware that once out boys and girls are back home. Its only a matter a time before once again the Taliban will be back in one form or another. That whats happening now in Iraq. But this time it up to the Middle East countries to sort this out.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 182.

    Whatever we do, it will never be enough, until it's too much.

    The problem is arms are freely available and that human nature dictates there are people willing to use them against others. You will never disarm the world, so all that's left is to protect who you can as much as you can whilst losing as few lives as possible.

    I wouldn't like to be the one to make the decision as to how thats done.

  • rate this
    +20

    Comment number 40.

    There is so much bitter vitriol, media manipulation, self interest and confusion that for a laymen it is impossible to filter fact from fiction..Only one thing seems to be without question and that is that this whole issue is a dangerous, uncontrollable mess.

  • rate this
    +34

    Comment number 29.

    No amount of Western help or intervention is going to make any difference to Middle East stability. You can't help people who can't help themselves, people of essentially the same religion killing each other. It's clear that it's all too easy for factions to get hold of arms and form new terrorist organisations. IF you can defeat one faction another will take it place. Such a sad state of life.

 

Comments 5 of 6

 

More Asia stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.