North Korea issues warning over South reunions

File photo: An elderly South Korean man wipes his tears as a North Korean relative [in the bus] waves to say good-bye after a luncheon during a separated family reunion meeting at the Mount Kumgang resort on the North's southeastern coast, 31 October 2010 Divided families meet briefly at the reunions before returning to their respective homes

North Korea has threatened to cancel family reunions with the South, a day after agreeing to hold them.

Its top military body said in a statement that it would reconsider the deal if joint US-South Korea military exercises went ahead.

"Dialogue and exercises of war" could not go hand in hand, South Korea's Yonhap news agency quoted the North Korean statement as saying.

The two Koreas last held reunions for divided families in 2010.

The next reunions - for family members separated when the Korean peninsula was partitioned at the end of the 1950-53 Korean War - are scheduled for 20 February.

In the past North Korea has cancelled reunions after the South took actions it opposed.

It has been accused of using the reunions, which are highly emotional events, as a bargaining chip.

'Proceed as normal'

"As we were reaching an agreement on the separated families, B-52 bombers were engaging in nuclear strike drills against us above Korea's western sea," the statement from North Korea's National Defence Commission said.


If celebration over the family reunions was muted here in South Korea on Wednesday, this is why.

North Korea's track record of sticking to its agreements is not good. It cancelled last year's reunions at short notice, after Seoul refused to tie them to inter-Korean economic projects. And 24 hours after it was announced, this latest glimmer of co-operation seems to have been snuffed out too.

The reasons given were well-worn: slander against the dignity of the North Korean state, and military training drills - apparently involving a nuclear-capable B-52 bomber.

But US and South Korean forces here routinely warn Pyongyang of any training drills in advance. If that was indeed the case, the North would have known about the exercise before it sat down to negotiate on Wednesday.

Large-scale military exercises planned for later this month were always seen as a potential snag in the plans. Last year, similar drills contributed to a rapid rise in tension here. And this year, they are due to begin around the same time as the reunions. No wonder many South Koreans remain cautious.

"As long as [South Korea] hurts our dignity and slanders our regime, we can't help but reconsider fulfilling the agreement," the statement added.

Seoul's Defence Ministry refused to comment on the activities of American assets, the BBC's Lucy Williamson in Seoul reports.

But South Korea's main news agency said the drill had involved one B-52 aircraft training along the country's south-western coastline, our correspondent adds.

Major US and South Korea military drills, which are held every year around this time, are due to begin later this month. The exercises anger Pyongyang, which views them as aggressive.

Last year, the exercises led to a prolonged surge in tensions, with North Korea threatening pre-emptive nuclear strikes and cutting a military hotline with the South.

A South Korean Defence Ministry spokesman said on Thursday that the joint drills would go ahead.

"We will proceed with our drills normally, regardless of the reunions for separated families," said ministry spokesman Kim Min-seok.

It is estimated that there are about 72,000 South Koreans - nearly half of them aged over 80 - on the waiting list for a chance to join the family reunion events.

Millions were separated from their families by the division of the Korean peninsula after the 1950-1953 war.

The programme was suspended after the North's shelling of a South Korean border island in November 2010.

More on This Story

Korea crisis

From other news sites

More Asia stories



Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.