South Korea shuts nuclear reactors over unapproved parts
The BBC's Lucy Williamson said both reactors would remain closed until parts had been replaced
South Korea has shut down two nuclear reactors after it was revealed that some parts used had not been properly vetted, an official says.
Knowledge Economy Minister Hong Suk-woo said these were "non-core" parts and were not a safety threat.
They included fuses, cooling fans and power switches that did not have the required nuclear industry certificates.
The shutdown means there could be "unprecedented" power shortages in the next few months, Mr Hong said.
The more than 5,000 parts could be used in other industries but needed international certification for nuclear power plant usage, he said.
Almost all the parts were used at the Yeonggwang Nuclear Power Plant, in the south-west, where the two reactors were shut down.
"Comprehensive safety check-ups are necessary at these two reactors where the uncertified parts were used extensively," the minister said.
"It's inevitable that we will experience unprecedented power shortage during the coming winter with the two reactors shut."
He said the parts, worth 820m won ($750,000, £467,800), had been sourced from eight suppliers since 2003.
South Korea's 23 nuclear reactors, which supply 35% of the country's electricity, have experienced a series of malfunctions over the past few months.
While none have posed a public risk, opposition to the government's bid to vastly expand its nuclear industry has been growing, says the BBC's Lucy Williamson in Seoul.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~24~RS~)


Dhaka collapse probe uncovers abuses
Security services knew Woolwich men
Believe it or not
Coffee 'overdose'
Building site
Day in pictures
Winning business
Talking Movies
Comment number 125.
Removed5th November 2012 - 18:00
All this user's posts have been removed.Why?
Link to this (Comment number 125)
Comment number 124.
Removed5th November 2012 - 17:57
All this user's posts have been removed.Why?
Link to this (Comment number 124)
Comment number 123.
JDavisabc5th November 2012 - 17:43
118. Drunken Hobo
Both a. and b. no doubt at all
a) rely on a dwindling resource - so the public can be taken for every penny thay have as long as there is a drop left, artificially raising the price.
b) As soon as it is covered up that it is actually free, leaving enough time to invent a reason to charge people. As long as humans are on this planet, there will be exploitation, and you know it.
Link to this (Comment number 123)
Comment number 122.
bob5th November 2012 - 17:35
#119
Chernobyl was old in 1986 and wasn't a fine example of Soviet engineering.
#107
So, where do we put geothermal plants in the UK?
Link to this (Comment number 122)
Comment number 121.
Multiculturalism_Fail5th November 2012 - 17:00
Hydro Power the planet is made of water water is then reused with a shelf life of infinity. Lets stop nuclear destruction of planet.
Link to this (Comment number 121)
Comments 5 of 125