Afghanistan's Taliban suspend peace talks with US

A US soldier watches members of the Afghan Public Protection Force arrive at the transition ceremony of private security forces to Afghan Public Protection Force (APPF) on the outskirts of Kabul President Karzai says Afghan troops should take the lead for nationwide security next year

The Taliban in Afghanistan have suspended preliminary peace negotiations with the United States.

The group blamed the Americans' "ever-changing position" and said US efforts to involve the Afghan authorities were a key stumbling block to further talks.

The Taliban regard the Kabul government as illegitimate.

Meanwhile President Hamid Karzai urged Nato troops to leave Afghan villages after a US soldier killed 16 civilians. US officials denied any major rift.

Officials told the BBC that the priority for the Afghan government was to avoid civilian casualties at any cost.

President Karzai told visiting US defence secretary Leon Panetta that Afghan troops should take the lead for nationwide security in 2013.


Start Quote

International security forces have to be taken out of Afghan village outposts and return to [larger] bases”

End Quote President Hamid Karzai

In a statement issued on Thursday, the Taliban said they had agreed to talks focusing on a political office being established in Qatar and on a prisoner exchange.

They said they were suspending the talks because of "the shaky, erratic and vague standpoint of the Americans".

US diplomatic sources say the Taliban were told by US negotiators that the Afghan government had to be a part of any negotiations.

The Taliban statement reiterated that the group "considers talking with the Kabul administration as pointless."

Other conditions reportedly set by the US in the talks include accepting of the Afghan constitution - which the Taliban have rejected - and publicly denouncing al-Qaeda.

The BBC's Quentin Sommerville in Kabul says the Taliban's suspension of the talks is a significant setback for efforts to begin substantive negotiations with the insurgents.

It was thought that a deal to exchange five Taliban fighters currently held at Guantanamo Bay for a kidnapped American soldier was only weeks away, our correspondent adds.

Taliban talks

  • Taliban peace talks had not formally begun but analysts say some steps had been taken to move such discussions closer
  • The Taliban set up a diplomatic office in the Gulf state of Qatar in January, the preferred location should peace talks begin
  • US officials have met the Taliban in Qatar and held preliminary discussions
  • One of the Taliban conditions was the release of five prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay. Negotiations on their fate were under way
  • A senior aide to President Hamid Karzai went to the prison and met the men

The US has so far declined to comment on the statement. An unnamed US official told AFP news agency: "I can't guess what the Taliban's motivations were."

Withdrawal plan

The killing of 16 Afghan villagers - including women and children - on Sunday has intensified calls for the withdrawal of foreign troops.

A statement from President Karzai's office said that as a result, "international security forces have to be taken out of Afghan village outposts and return to (larger) bases".

The American soldier accused of carrying out the shooting was based at a small compound in Kandahar province. Mr Karzai said the incident had harmed relations with the US.

US officials later appeared to play down the statement. Pentagon spokesman George Little told reporters it reflected "President Karzai's strong interest in moving as quickly as possible to a fully independent and sovereign Afghanistan".

He added: "We believe that we need to continue to work together because that's an American goal as well."

The US soldier - who has not been named or charged - was flown to Kuwait on Wednesday.

Afghan MPs had demanded that he be tried in Afghanistan. Correspondents say that scenario is very unlikely.

Nato and the US administration have insisted that there will be no change of strategy in Afghanistan.

Nato's International Security Assistance Force plans to withdraw all of its combat forces by the end of 2014. American troops are also following that timetable.



This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 477.

    Yet again too many armchair pundits not having a clue what they're talking about. Our initial intervention was justified and sanctioned. The big mistake was invading Iraq and allowing the taliban back in. We can't just leave Afghanistan tomorrow. Don't believe everything you see on the BBC, there is many positive stories that don't make the news. We should leave only when the afghans are ready.

  • rate this

    Comment number 448.

    Afghanistan is complex . The USA and UK never had justification to interfere.(Confirmed by senior military at the time.) Interference compounded the problems. The Taliban reduced opium production and export ; it rose under western occupation. Afghanistan can return to the era in which women were educated and powerful. And the Taliban must be involved in settlement talks.

  • rate this

    Comment number 284.

    Do none of our 'leaders' EVER read a history book? Apparently not, because if they did they would realize that Afghanistan was ever thus and will ever be thus. The west has no business there - home now, turf out taliban symps and protect our the borders!!

  • rate this

    Comment number 281.

    268.Sean O Connor was absolutely ridiculous and a huge mistake to even consider talks with the taliban from the first place,.
    Desperation makes fools of us all. The US and UK should never have gone gunslinging into Afghanistan like a couple of US Marshals with a bunch of sceptical NATO Deputies in tow But it failed, and now we have to talk, or go,or both. And the sooner the better

  • rate this

    Comment number 277.

    Karzai is just playing politics. He knows just as well as everyone else if Nato withdrawl now he will not remain in office much longer than the 2 days it would take the Taliban to march right back into Khabal. NATO's mistake was Iraq this mess could have been solved 5 years ago if the correct resources were put in place.


Comments 5 of 18


More Asia stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.