Who is fanning Tibet's flames?

A young monk stands at Tibetan monastery in Sichuan province's Hongyuan county on 19 October 2011 The self-immolations have taken place near Tibetan monasteries like this one in Sichuan province

It was just a few minutes to one in the afternoon last Thursday.

Standing at a road junction in a town in Sichuan, in south-western China, was a young woman.

Without warning, she doused herself in petrol - she may even have drunk some - and then set fire to herself.

Tibetans say her name was Palden Choetso; she was 35 years old and had been a Tibetan Buddhist nun since the age of 20. Official Chinese reports gave her name in Chinese as Qiu Xiang.

Her death, it is thought, was swift and, one can only imagine, agonising.

So what drives someone to such an awful, desperate step? In fact, what drives 11 people to willingly burn themselves like this?

'Desperate situation'

That is what has happened so far this year in Aba and Garze (known in Tibetan as Ngaba and Kardze), both Tibetan areas of Sichuan.

Two of those who set fire to themselves have been nuns; nine of them were men, monks or former monks. Six of the eleven have died, the fate of the others is not know.

Palden Choetso (or Qiu Xiang) was the oldest; the youngest was 18.

This wave of self-immolations is unprecedented. So what is happening in these Tibetan communities? Who or what is fanning the flames?

China is keeping foreign journalists out of the areas. Tibet's exiled leadership says those who set fire to themselves shouted slogans as they did so: "Long live his holiness the Dalai Lama", "Let the Dalai Lama return to Tibet", and "Freedom for Tibet".

The Dalai Lama meets journalists at a press conference in Tokyo on 7 November 2011 The Tibetan spiritual leader says Beijing's policies have created a desperate situation

On Monday the Dalai Lama, speaking in Japan, said: "Some kind of cultural genocide is taking place... that is why you see these sorts of sad incidents happen, due to the desperateness of the situation."

Tibet's Prime Minister-in-exile Lobsang Sangay has been more explicit. "The monks and nuns who immolated themselves were sacrificing their bodies to draw the world's attention to Chinese repression in Tibet," he said.

"While the leadership in exile does not encourage self-immolation," Mr Sangay added, "we must focus on the causes... the continuing occupation of Tibet and the Chinese policies of cultural repression, cultural assimilation, economic marginalisation and environmental destruction."


Unsurprisingly, China has pointed the finger straight back. The Xinhua news agency said of Qiu Xiang's death that "initial investigation showed the case was masterminded and instigated by the Dalai Lama clique, which has plotted a chain of self-immolations in the past months for splitting motives".

China's Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei criticised the exiled leaders for "refusing to denounce the self-immolations", charging that instead "they are publicising these events, and inciting further immolations".

The US Department of State has weighed in too, saying it has "repeatedly urged the Chinese government to address its counter-productive policies in Tibetan areas that have created tensions".

Amid the finger-pointing one thing is clear. The immolations have gone on and on.

The first was by a 20-year-old monk called Phuntsog in March. China responded by deploying thousands of armed police, locking down monasteries, pressuring many monks to undergo "patriotic re-education", and shipping hundreds more away to an unknown fate.

But none of that has stopped the burning. There is, it seems despair among some Tibetans. Why else would a 20-year-old, or a 35-year-old, choose - willingly, it seems - to die in petrol-fuelled flames lit by their own hands?

Are they a few manipulated by leaders outside Tibet or are they indicative of broader discontent?

China says it is working to bring progress and development to Tibetan areas. It is hoping those, and a firm hand when it comes to security, will end the tensions. But what if its policies are not working?

The question we should perhaps be asking then is not so much who is fanning the flames, but rather what will douse them?

Damian Grammaticas Article written by Damian Grammaticas Damian Grammaticas China correspondent

Uncovering China's illegal ivory trade

Demand for ivory in China has pushed levels of poaching to new highs. The BBC's Damian Grammaticas investigates China's illegal ivory traders.

Read full article


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 115.

    Tibet has been part of China since the Manchus ruled. Tibetans should learn to work the system while retaining their identity. Or maybe China should be more like the United States and treat the Tibetans like the Native Americans. Instead of developing the land for everyone and educating the people, China should push all the Tibetans into reservations in undesirable areas and let them open gambling casinos.

  • rate this

    Comment number 114.

    And where do all your wealth and goods come from?

    Nowhere have I personally made any threat to China or Tibet (or any other country for that matter).

    As regards pushing too hard it would be just fine if WW3 were to start up and blast 5 Billion people away would it?
    Maybe the world would be in a better place but from what I KNOW it certainly would not.

    I said I did not trust the Chinese for good reason.
    Somehow I do not trust the West either, the way they hammer Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.

  • rate this

    Comment number 113.


    Ha! What a cowardly hypocrite, Kelly makes veiled threats then claims peace. How Chinese!!!

  • rate this

    Comment number 112.

    There is widespread condemnation of China's attitude to Tibet.
    Diplomacy is not always shouted from the rooftops, but is used to gently nudge a sleeping giant to an awakened state.

    China was most displeased when Barack President Barack Obama held a White House meeting Saturday with the Dalai Lama
    Angela Merkel, went ahead with an informal meeting with the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama yesterday, despite China.

    It would not be good to nudge a giant like China into an aggressive stance because that would do NOBODY any good, especially Tibet.

    Peace be with Tibet and China.

  • rate this

    Comment number 111.

    @109.Nils Eldor
    Thank you for your candour.
    Without trying to be condescending, and realising the position in Tibet to only slight degree, may I lay out the future?
    If neither the Tibetan Parties nor the China Parties change this problem will continue for eternity.
    China, who I do not trust personally, has 1.3 BILLION people to look after. China's speed and size of metamorphosis to a more modern civilization can not be understated. It may take some time for China to develop humanitarian skills, that it has not been used to granting.
    If not by decree it could be trouble like Tienanmen Sq.


Comments 5 of 115



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.