What does Gaddafi's death mean for Africa?

 
Nelson Mandela and Muammar Gaddafi (archive shot)

A grandson of Nelson Mandela is named Gadaffi - a sign of how popular the late Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi once was in South Africa and many other African countries.

With his image of a revolutionary, Col Gaddafi inspired South Africans to fight for their liberation, funding and arming the anti-apartheid movement as it fought white minority rule.

However, he also backed notorious rebel groups in Liberia and Sierra Leone and his demise could serve as a warning to the continent's other "big-man" rulers.

Start Quote

We saw him [Col Gaddafi] slap his foreign minister in our presence, which is something unexpected of any dignified and self-respecting head of state”

End Quote Moses Wetangula Kenya's foreign minister

After Mr Mandela became South Africa's first black president in 1994, he rejected pressure from Western leaders - including then-US President Bill Clinton - to sever ties with Col Gaddafi, who bankrolled his election campaign.

"Those who feel irritated by our friendship with President Gaddafi can go jump in the pool," he said.

Instead, Mr Mandela played a key role in ending Col Gaddafi's pariah status in the West by brokering a deal with the UK over the 1988 Lockerbie bombing.

It led to Col Gaddafi handing over Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi for trial in Scotland. He was convicted in 2001, before being released eight years later on compassionate grounds - a decision Mr Mandela welcomed.

Mr Mandela saw the Lockerbie deal as one of his biggest foreign policy achievements.

"No-one can deny that the friendship and trust between South Africa and Libya played a significant part in arriving at this solution... It vindicates our view that talking to one another and searching for peaceful solutions remain the surest way to resolve differences and advance peace and progress in the world," he said in 1999, as he approached the end of his presidency.

"It was pure expediency to call on democratic South Africa to turn its back on Libya and [Col] Gaddafi, who had assisted us in obtaining democracy."

'Vanquished'

Col Gaddafi's position in Africa was paradoxical. Just as he backed pro-democracy causes, he also fuelled rebellions in countries such as Liberia and Sierra Leone and supported Uganda's infamous dictator Idi Amin.

African leaders tended to overlook this.

"Muammar Gaddafi, whatever his faults, is a true nationalist. I prefer nationalists to puppets of foreign interests," Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni said in February.

"Therefore, the independent-minded Gaddafi had some positive contribution to Libya, I believe, as well as Africa and the Third World.

Col Muammar Gaddafi with African traditional leaders (archive shot) Col Gaddafi was declared Africa's "king of kings"

"We should also remember, as part of that independent-mindedness, he expelled British and American military bases from Libya [after he took power]," Mr Museveni said.

Start Quote

The AU will work better now without his [Gaddafi's] delaying it and with some members no longer feeling as intimidated by him as they did”

End Quote Jacob Zuma South African president

Col Gaddafi played a prominent role in the formation of the African Union (AU) - a body in which he wielded enormous influence because he was one of its major financiers.

At an AU summit in 2008, he got many African traditional leaders to declare him the continent's "king of kings".

A spokesman for one of those traditional leaders - Uganda's Tooro kingdom - says Col Gaddafi was a "visionary" and would be missed.

"We saw the human side of him - not Gaddafi the colonel or the proverbial terrorist as the Americans and Europeans described him," Philip Winyi said.

"In spite of what many see as his weaknesses, he has done quite a lot for Africa, contributing to the building of infrastructure."

Col Gaddafi pushed for a United States of Africa to rival the US and the European Union (EU).

"We want an African military to defend Africa. We want a single currency. We want one African passport," he said.

Africa's other leaders paid lip-service to achieving this vision but none seemed very serious about putting it into practice.

In a BBC interview after Col Gaddafi's death, Kenya's Foreign Minister Moses Wetangula said the late Libyan leader sometimes showed a violent streak at AU meetings.

"He really suppressed Libyan people and vanquished them to the extent that in one of many AU meetings we saw him slap his foreign minister in our presence, which is something unexpected of any dignified and self-respecting head of state," Mr Wetangula told the BBC's Focus on Africa programme.

Mugabe and Gaddafi

An AU expert with the South African Institute for International Affairs, Kathryn Sturman, says Col Gaddafi's death will have a profound effect on the AU.

Col Gaddafi on Africa

2008: "We want an African military to defend Africa, we want a single African currency, we want one African passport to travel within Africa," after being declared king of kings by African traditional rulers in Libya.

2010: "We don't know what will happen, what will be the reaction of the white and Christian Europeans faced with this influx of starving and ignorant Africans," after discussing halting the flow of African migrants to Italy.

2007: "Libya is an African country. May Allah help the Arabs and keep them away from us. We don't want anything to do with them."

2009: "I am an international leader, the dean of the Arab rulers, the king of kings of Africa and the imam of Muslims, and my international status does not allow me to descend to a lower level," at an Arab League summit.

"It's the end of an era for the AU. Libya was one of the big five [along with South Africa, Nigeria, Egypt and Algeria] financial contributors of the organisation. It paid 15% [of its budget], and also the membership fees of countries in arrears, like Malawi," Ms Sturman said.

"The new government in Libya is not going to be well disposed to the AU [which opposed the Nato-led intervention in Libya]."

Ms Sturman said that while the AU financial woes may worsen, it may work more effectively in the post-Gaddafi era.

"He was very adamant about pursuing a United States of Africa - and was quite obstructive in attempts to bring about deeper regional integration."

Last week, South Africa's President Jacob Zuma - whose government initially backed Nato intervention, but then denounced it - echoed a similar view in a foreign policy speech.

"Colonel Gaddafi spent a lot of time discussing a unity government for Africa that was impossible to implement now. He was in a hurry for this, possibly because he wanted to head it up himself.

"I had arguments with him about it several times. The AU will work better now without his delaying it and with some members no longer feeling as intimidated by him as they did," the South African president said.

It is an open secret in political circles that some African leaders are also intimated by Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe, who remained a staunch ally of Col Gaddafi until his death.

Having spearheaded Zimbabwe's independence struggle, Mr Mugabe - who has been in office since 1980 - portrays the opposition as "puppets" of the West as he tries to hang on to power.

But as Col Gaddafi's fate shows, such rhetoric no longer strikes a chord with most Africans - a point South Africa's Nobel Peace laureate Archbishop Desmond Tutu made when he told the BBC's Focus on Africa programme:

"He [Gaddafi] had this wonderful dream about a United States of Africa - like [Ghana's post-independence leader] Kwame Nkrumah, but I think we are going to remember what happened in the latter days of his rule when he actually bombed his own people."

 

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 35.

    Well, well, well, finally it is done.The "Big Man" is down, "MISSION" accomplished.
    This should be the delight of those who wanted him dead.Like Laurent Gbangbo,it took a foreign intervention for this to happen.
    So, what do "THEY" want?.I just want to alert "THEM" that "THEY" have just won a battle but something BIGGER is still to come and it shall be borne by the citizen.

  • rate this
    +9

    Comment number 34.

    The AU is a joke organization whose sole purpose is to provide political cover for its ruling despots. They opposed action on some ideological anti-west ticket while doing nothing themselves. The libyans are now thankful to the west for helping them in their hour of need while the AU worries about the gravytrain being derailed. Says it all really. And look at their support of Mugabe...

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 33.

    Gaddafi was a dictator, but he was not as bad as many dictators we support (Syria?). He gave his people the highest standard of living in NA, was secular and had good health care and equal education. Let us hope that this can be improved upon in future. His martyrdom, and the off mandate air strike involved may inflame some fanatics, but it will make little difference South of the Sahara.

  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 32.

    I am deeply suspicious of the circumstances of his death. A barbaric end for a barbaric man, live by the sword..die by the sword. yet he did start as an idealist who wanted to make libya better. good luck to the libyans, stick together. African Union needs to step up now, this continent has had enough suffering, its a land of untold wonder and should be a paradise

  • rate this
    +6

    Comment number 31.

    What does it mean for Africa?

    Another Islamic state, probably.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 30.

    ukpunk
    He was alive and then executed. That is not democracy. He should have been tried in a Court.
    ----------------
    Judging by the amount of drones flying around, it seems it's the new world order. Without any Court procedures/charges you are automatically deemed to be guilty. But then I never expected to see Gaddafi on trial. Too many secrets would have come out. Dead men don't talk.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 29.

    Those who talk about Libyans living in poverty are clearly ignorant to facts and probably non african. How is it that Gaddafi was so "Terrible" to his people yet Libya had the highest standard of living in Africa under his rule according to the HDI? That being said I do not condone his latter actions however i think we shouldn't label this man by taking information of media at face value

  • rate this
    -11

    Comment number 28.

    THIS IS GOOD NEWS FOR AFRICA TO THE CONTRATRY.
    AFRICA WILL NEVER TRUST THE WEST AGAIN. THE WEST SUPPORTS YOU WHEN IT SUITS THEM AND AGAINST YOU IF YOU STAND UP AGAINST EXPLOITATION. THE WEST IS NOW SEEN AS TWO FACED, HYPOCRATE WITH COLONIAL MENTALITY.
    JUST LOOK HOW THE WEST IS QUITE ABOUT BAHRAIN.
    WHAT GOES ROUND WILL COME ROUND ONE DAY.

  • rate this
    +8

    Comment number 27.

    Gaddafi is crazy person who never care about anything except the power. he is behind any woe in horn Africa . He is also in clear identity crisis as Berber person who declaring himself as Arab. His hate for Berber tribes in his own country is unimaginable so does for Black people in Sudan. His death is inevitable if the principle of “people harvest what they saw” will ever work.

  • rate this
    -5

    Comment number 26.

    The British Government should hang its head in shame for getting a consent from the UN to take action to "protect citizens" and then illegally and dishonestly using it to wage a war instead.

    The British taxpayer foots the bill for sorting out the world, yet again. Will David Cameron be asking the Libyans to repay this country the cost of liberating it, from its oil revenue? I don't suppose so.

  • rate this
    +18

    Comment number 25.

    I haves had nightmares about watching the video on TV. He was alive and then executed. That is not democracy. He should have been tried in a Court.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 24.

    The dictator is dead, long live the dictator.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 23.

    Unfortunately, the AU is too weak, fragmented and damaged a political institution to recover legitimacy and influence, even now that Gadaffi is gone. And of course, the ideal of a United States of Africa is a few generations away, at best (again, unfortunately). However, one less meddling, self-appointed "godfather" or "fixer" of the continent can only be a good thing for Africa in general.

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 22.

    If Gaddaffi had killed my mom on capture I would probably been tempted to shot him. Over here in the UK the rule is if the invader/intruder poses no threat you hand them over to the authoirites to be dealt with by the cirminal justice system. David Cameron praising the murder of a human being- double standards or what? His he moving towards Shariah law????

  • rate this
    -4

    Comment number 21.

    1 tin pot dictator gone, only another hundred or more left to get rid of.

    But hey, at least now we in the west can make sure Libya is run by people who are "on our side" again.

    Won't be long before those lucrative oil contracts are being put in front of the new administration, if they haven't already been...

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 20.

    Gaddafi was seen wounded and alive on foreign news channels and then shown dead with a bullet hole in his head!!!!!!!!!!!! And you ask what does Gaddafis death mean to Africa NO CHANGE.

  • Comment number 19.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    +9

    Comment number 18.

    T.E.Lawrence (he of Arabia) wrote in his book Seven Pillars of Wisdom, "We lived many lives in those whirling campaigns, never sparing ourselves: yet when we achieved and the new world dawned, the old men came out again and took our victory to re-make in the likeness of the former world they knew". Let us hope the efforts of so many will not be hi-jacked.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 17.

    How can we support cold blooded killers who shot Gadafi whilst he was injured ? This makes them as bad as him. Now they want to bury him secretly so noone can see or prove how he was murdered !!!
    Instead of remembering his atrocities people will remember this act of murder.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 16.

    Probably not a lot. Just another corrupt leader will take his place

 

Page 13 of 14

 

More Africa stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.