Nationalism looks set to remain on trend in France

 
Marine Le Pen Marine Le Pen won 18% of the first round vote

PARIS: The first round of the French elections has provided a salutary lesson in the effects of the economic crisis in a Western democracy.

There has been polarisation to the extremes, a refusal by many to engage with the country's basic economic dilemmas, taking refuge instead in fundamentalist ideas about the country's ills, and the search for scapegoats.

During the past few weeks, the leading candidates have often played to the viscera with messages about immigration, national identity, and the evils of the international financial markets.

We are not yet back in the 1930s, but this type of campaigning, in which candidates often shun economic complexities in favour of vote mobilising emotive slogans might just get us there.

The degree to which France has polarised can be judged by comparing Sunday's votes with those of the first round in 2007. The country's starting point five years ago, it should be remembered, was a little to the right of centre.

Nicolas Sarkozy's share of the national vote has dropped from 31% to 27.2% on Sunday, and Francois Bayrou's by more than half to 9.1%. From the centre these millions of voters migrated to Marine Le Pen whose share swelled to more than 18% (her father got 10.4% in 2007), and some to the socialists or Left Front candidate Jean-Luc Melenchon.

No wonder Angela Merkel on Monday said she was worried about polarisation.

Immigration claims

Faced with this challenge, Mr Sarkozy has tried to respond with messages about checking immigration, regaining control of the country's borders (talking about a possible opt out from Europe's Schengen agreement) and dawn raids on suspected Islamic militants.

Despite being one of the authors of Europe's Fiscal Compact (which aims to enforce public spending limits on EU members by law) the president has tried to insist that France's welfare state will be safe in his hands.

The candidates who have done well have been those who have suggested that France does not have to choose between its "social model" and international competitiveness, and stirred up their followers with more emotive stuff.

Ms Le Pen has talked about escaping the entire EU budgetary regime by leaving the euro, and blamed many of the country's problems, such as rising unemployment, on unchecked immigration.

As for the left, both Francois Hollande and Mr Melenchon have essentially proposed borrowing their way out of recession, while condemning the evils of the international financial markets. Indeed, take apart the speeches at Sarkozy, Le Pen, Hollande, or Melenchon rallies and you will find some pretty similar themes - highly nationalistic in nature, and inveighing against the evils of globalisation or international capital.

It is only the right's stance on immigration that really marks them out.

Co-operation reduced

Now the race is down to two candidates, will this type of tub thumping give way to a more reasoned debate about whether France can still afford its way of life? Many French analysts suggest the answer is yes, and that the first round will have allowed those who are bewildered and angry to have their protest.

However, it is not that simple. Many of Ms Le Pen's voters, perhaps millions of them, are expected to abstain in the next round. Mr Sarkozy meanwhile, has not defaulted to a detailed, common sense, campaign about the economy, but has ratcheted up his right wing messages in an attempt to mobilise those Le Pen voters to support him.

What does all this tell us about the shape of European politics to come? It certainly suggests that finding agreement at the European level will be harder, and that recent trends towards more nationalistic politics will continue.

Pretty much all of the French candidates have tried to mark themselves out with voters by defining new limits on international co-operation and by emphasising that France, as a great and historic nation, can keep certain international forces at bay.

So Mr Sarkozy talks about coming out of the Schengen agreement, Ms le Pen of ditching the euro, Mr Hollande of renegotiating the EU's budgetary rules, and Mr Melenchon of sidestepping international markets or Nato's military command structure.

It's not a bright picture, and it poses uncomfortable questions about the ability of Western liberal democracies to engage with crisis head on and deal with it.

 
Mark Urban, Diplomatic and defence editor, Newsnight Article written by Mark Urban Mark Urban Diplomatic and defence editor, BBC Newsnight

Where next in the struggle for Iraq?

After a kind of strategic pause in the battle for Iraq, it appears as if Isis has got its act together first. Where is this struggle for Iraq heading next? Mark Urban examines the scenarios.

Read full article

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 1.

    Responding to voters concerns over immigration, after years of neglect and poor mouthing, is not scapegoating. We don't know Mark Urbans experience of immigration, nor Gavin Hewitts, but we can assume both through position & wealth are entirely insulated from its negative effects. This cultural bias saturates the BBC.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 2.

    there's a surprise; normal, working [or, those who used to have job until recently] people feel more and more alienated by the main political parties throughout Europe, seeing them as being no more than puppets of banks and big business with their arrogant disregard for redistributing wealth or paying their fair percentage of taxes. We;re back to the 1% controlling the other 99.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 3.

    at least immigration is being discussed in france..he it is nearly a taboo
    subject in mainstream parties..it is the lack of debate that causes the
    more militant parties to flourish here..

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 4.

    Dear Marc Urban,

    Please don't put this down as a miss guided vote.
    People are sick of being told that all people are happly integrating.
    We do not want imigration we want to keep our own culture.
    The so called integration of certain people has failed bitterly.
    Instead they are asking us to change our ways banning alcohol in Unis and pork what the heck is that.Europe is Christian in Origin end OF

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 5.

    For years the discussion of any apect of immigration is seen as "racist" and therefore taboo and frowned upon by the main parties - then in several elections policiticians have bleated about the dangerous swing to BNP,etc. Common sense has long escaped our political masters - for heavens sake why do the voters swing that way?? well have a guess...Urbans certainly does not live in Wood Green.

 

Comments 5 of 8

 

This entry is now closed for comments

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.