What the rise of political Islam is likely to spell


Tunisia's Islamists are claiming victory in their elections and across North Africa political Islam is on the march.

So does this mark a decisive defeat for al-Qaeda and its violent ideology, or perhaps an understanding that the ballot box offers a more effective way to achieve similar goals of society governed by religious principles and subject to Sharia law?

There are probably almost as many answers to that question as there are religious sages in Cairo or Qom.

The parties that campaign for the "green vote" in Tunisia, Libya, or Egypt have different positions on the defining issue of Islamism - whether to govern by religious law or allow different authorities, notably civil courts, to continue.

One thing is clear, that Islamic slogans and political language have great power in this new situation or Arab Spring.

"We, as an Islamic state, have adopted the Islamic Sharia as the main source of legislation," Mustafa Abdul Jalil the chairman of Libya's National Transitional Council said on Sunday, announcing his country's liberation from the rule of Muammar Gaddafi, "as such, any law that runs contrary to the Islamic principles of the Islamic Sharia is legally void".

In the case of Libya, Mr Jalil suggested this meant moving quickly to establish banks based on religious non-profit principles. He did not advocate cutting off the hands of thieves or stoning adulterers.

Elsewhere the presence of non-Muslim minorities, as well as the desire not to scare off foreign investors or tourists has produced different language.

Tunisia's Ennahda Party, which is expected to get about 40% of the vote when all the ballots have been counted, says that it does not believe in adopting religious law.

In Egypt the mainstream Muslim Brotherhood, recognising the concerns of the Coptic Christian minority as well as secular Egyptians who enjoy their freedoms, says it is not seeking to move to Sharia.

The Al Nour party by contrast wants, in the slogans of hundreds of thousands of supporters that we filmed a couple of months ago in Cairo, a "Sharia State Now!"

These parties between them are expected to poll well in November's Egyptian parliamentary elections, possibly even achieving an overall majority.

Critics of the Muslim Brotherhood, and indeed Tunisia's Ennahda, claim that they do really harbour the goal of an Islamic state but are cloaking this ambition in ambiguity as a matter of political expediency.

So does a belief that society, ultimately should be run according to Islamic principles put these politicians in the same ideological boat as al-Qaeda? Or does it make them little different to a US presidential candidate who, as a devout Christian, may hold messianic beliefs but does not expect the Second Coming during his or her term of office?

The other great question that could distinguish the new wave of political Islamists from the hard-liners of al-Qaeda is that of political pluralism - more specifically whether they will be able to relinquish power once they have won it.

Once again the language espoused by Ennahda or even Egypt's Al Nour party is clear; that they will accept the verdict of the ballot box even if they are defeated.

Experience in other parts of the Middle East is more equivocal. Hamas, which won the Palestinian vote in 2006 now appears as reluctant to put its fortunes in Gaza, which it has governed since 2007, to the popular vote as its Fatah rivals do in the West Bank.

Both factions have committed to elections as part of a reconciliation agreement, but the plan has yet to deliver significant results.

In Iraq, where Nouri al-Maliki's Shia grouping actually got fewer seats in the 2010 parliamentary elections than its main rival, he clung to power for months until he was able to out manoeuvre them in coalition negotiations. Mr Maliki remains in office today.

The benign interpretation of the rise of political Islam in North Africa is that it simply reflects a flourishing or religious and national feeling made possible by the removal of dictators who often saw the mosques as dens of sedition.

This repression spawned underground movements that included both the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaeda. The migration of some prominent believers in violent Jihad to its electoral form - such as Abdul Hakim Belhadj, the Tripoli militia commander - underlines the idea that political movements, like people, evolve.

For the moment most of the professionally sceptical - people like Western intelligence agencies or militaries - are taking the rise of North African political Islam in good faith.

Religious parties look set to win dominant roles in ruling coalitions and it will soon be possible to judge their commitment to minority rights or pluralism by their deeds rather than just their words.

Mark Urban Article written by Mark Urban Mark Urban Diplomatic and defence editor, BBC Newsnight

CIA interrogation report: Just what did the UK know?

Mark Urban explores the question of what the UK knew about rendition and interrogation techniques, in the wake of the US Senate report that criticised the CIA.

Read full article


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 7.

    Hamas won Palestinian vote. NO country had the right to discard the vote of the Palestinian People. It wasn't repression that spawned movements like Muslim Brotherhood & al-Qaeda. It was Arab Spring that allowed these already-spawned-movements to boldly come forth. With religious parties in power, we will judge commitment to democratic rights. It may even be possible to judge that of the west.

  • rate this

    Comment number 6.

    Arab Spring appears to have seeded Islamic fall.
    I've heard the Islamic financial institutions are non-usury, quite fair, & surely an improvement on western banks.
    Tunisia's Ennahda Party is already seeking coalition with secular parties in the Govt; the situation seems quite positive. Egypt as you say seems to lean: "Sharia State Now!"

  • rate this

    Comment number 5.

    Congratulations Ennahda - a victory for moderate Islam.
    So does this mark a decisive defeat for al-Qaeda?
    No, if you look closely at the rabble among the Libyan rebels, you will see a number of faces normally associated with violent ideology, even Guantanamo. Future Libyan Sharia is an unknown.

  • rate this

    Comment number 4.

    The way west was saying these people needs to be liberated it should be meaningful if these people want to adopt a way of life in which they want to follow divine guidance in there political and economic system then this should be respected and unnecessary objections should be avoided,and if they want to implement sharia it is in there own country and not in the WEST so west should not object .

  • rate this

    Comment number 3.

    Will West and U.S allow Afr-arab nation to rule itself democratically ? May be, West and U.S may be planning of changing whole afro-asio-arab into a situation like Algeirs. In case they don,t plan so, it is very big positive development.

  • rate this

    Comment number 2.

    Inshallah, may the Islamic state and Caliphate return. Ameen.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1.

    How nonchalantly did the author slip in "He did not advocate cutting off the hands of thieves or stoning adulterers."



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.