On the 1st day of Christmas....a Barnett formula debate

 

Never mind the nightly drinks parties that fill Westminster diaries at this time of year to satisfy the thirstiest hack. What could be more exciting than spending an evening discussing the Barnett formula?

The House of Lords did just that last night. The debate was prompted by a recent call from the Local Government Association for the formula, which links changes in the Welsh government spending to comparable changes in English budgets, to be replaced.

The speakers included Lord [Barry] Jones, whose ministerial career coincided with the invention of the formula, named after a Treasury minister of the time, Joel [now Lord] Barnett. Lord Jones explained: "the background to the Barnett formula was the consequence of three beleaguered administrations of which I was a member."

According to Lord Jones, Lord Barnett, still going strong at 90, coped with the economic stresses of the 1970s by sharing a half-bottle of House of Commons champagne with a colleague before returning to his Treasury desk.

Lord Jones had a warning for today's ministers tempted to tinker with the Barnett formula: "My one observation is to be careful for what you wish if you are a Welshman in governance, particularly in Wales. Whatever the outcome of the Scottish constitutional debate, Barnett will come to the fore in all our deliberations and arguably shall be in the manifestos of the great political parties. That is for certain.

"My caution is this. Roughly speaking, per head of the population in England the sum of money per citizen is exceeded in Scotland by £1,400; and in my own country, Wales, by some £800. I have spent only 43 years here in Westminster, and I am concerned that when Whitehall mandarins have their monthly meetings they may be tempted to consider how they may be able to get rid of the responsibility as it affects the Celtic fringes. I therefore feel that before one advances one should know precisely what the outcome is."

Former Plaid Cymru leader Lord Wigley complained that only the LGA purported to represent councils in England and Wales, it pitched its arguments solely in the context of England, whose communities, it said, were being short-changed by as much as £4.1 billion a year.

Lord Wigley said he supported the thrust of the LGA's approach and hope that "all UK parties will make a pledge in their manifestos for the 2015 election to introduce a needs-based formula for distribution of resources."

For the government, Lord Newby [a Liberal Democrat] offered little hope of change: "While we we recognise the concerns expressed about the formula, as made clear in our programme for government, this government's priorities remain that we deal with the deficit, bring debt down, and build on the growth we are beginning to see demonstrated right across the UK. There are therefore no plans to review the formula in this parliament."

That was a point underlined by the prime minister in a letter to Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond. David Cameron told him bluntly: "reform of the Barnett formula is not on the horizon." That may have been designed to re-assure Scottish voters that the formula's alleged generosity to them would survive a "no" vote in the independence referendum but it looks as if Lord Wigley (and some English Conservatives) will be disappointed when they read the next Conservative manifesto.

 
David Cornock Article written by David Cornock David Cornock Parliamentary correspondent, Wales

Ed Miliband and the Barnett formula - your daily update

Does Ed Miliband's defence of the Barnett formula stand up to scrutiny?

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 4.

    Why reform the Barnett Formula when we can scrap it and fund Wales according to need like HMG does for the administrative areas in England?

    Let's face it - it's only a few spreadsheets - it would only take a couple of days, and no extra staff, to add the Wales NUTS units to it.

    WAG keeps bleating about a nominal £300m shortfall but they must have wasted at least that much moaning about it!!!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 3.

    A government has to be essentially Marxist : collect from those with money: spend according to need.
    So it is reasonable to spend more in Powys, Cornwall and the Highlands. Spending more in Edinburgh than in Merthyr is a moral nonsense.

    BTW 'reforming Barnett' What makes WAG think that will mean more money for their little schemes.??

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 2.

    "David Cameron told him bluntly: "reform of the Barnett formula is not on the horizon"_++++++++++++++++++++
    That statement will cost him a lot more votes than it will gain him. Ever dismissal of England is a spadeful of soil on his coffin.
    Home rule for England if we are to survive as a nation with our own government and borders.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 1.

    ... Barnett would last many decades into the future if it was equitable to all, I would advocate the same sum per head no-matter where the person lives, equality across all the regions (geographical) of the United Kingdom.

    If Cameron had a spine he would explain to the Scots "the halcyon days are over".

 

Features

  • Peaky Blinders publicity shotBrum do

    Why is the Birmingham accent so difficult to mimic?


  • Oliver CromwellA brief history

    The 900 year story behind the creation of a UK parliament


  • Image of Ankor Wat using lidarJungle Atlantis

    How lasers have revealed an ancient city beneath the forest


  • TheatreBard taste? Watch

    Are trailer videos on social media spoiling theatre?


  • Agents with the US Secret Service, such as this one, are responsible for guarding the presidentHard at work

    White House break-in adds to Secret Service woes


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.