Clegg praises devolution report but will he enact it?


Yesterday, it was our turn. Today, MPs got the chance to follow the media and question the deputy prime minister on his many responsibilities.

Curiously, a Liberal Democrat and a Conservative MP had tabled identical questions to Nick Clegg: "what assessment he has made of the work of the Commission on Devolution in Wales?"

Mr Clegg praised the Silk commission report as "radical", "thorough and thoughtful", "a thorough analysis". So good that he'd want to implement it ASAP and give the Welsh government tax-raising powers?

Lib Dem Mark Williams asked for a guarantee that it would be implemented before the next general election in 2015. He didn't get one. Mr Clegg praised the report but said: "I can certainly confirm that we will respond in full well before part 2 of the Silk commission proceedings is concluded. We aim to provide our full response to part 1, about the fiscal aspects of further devolution to Wales, by spring this year."

Tory Glyn Davies suggested there would be no need for a referendum on the devolution of income tax if the four main parties included the idea in their election manifestos (although conversely, you could argue that the absence of policy choice was an argument for a referendum). Mr Clegg told him: "The Silk commission has on it representatives of all four parties in the Assembly, and it was a unanimously supported recommendation that the change in income tax recommended in part 1 should be implemented only once a referendum had taken place. Obviously, we will look at this very closely. We are acutely aware that it represents a cross-party approach within Wales itself."

Plaid Cymru's Elfyn Llwyd asked Mr Clegg a question along the lines of that asked by Mark Williams. He got a similar response: "As I said, we all need to take a careful look at part 1 and take a collective decision within the coalition government on how we respond to it. As ministers in all parts of the coalition have said, it is an extremely thorough and thoughtful piece of work representing a cross-party approach in Wales, and we will respond to it with similar seriousness before the spring of this year."

So plenty of warm words, but no indication of what the government's response to the report will be - although Mr Clegg has set himself a firm deadline with that "before the spring of this year" line.

The shadow Welsh Secretary, Owen Smith, accused Mr Clegg of ignorance. In a statement, Mr Smith said: "The deputy prime minister clearly hasn't read the report as he inaccurately claimed that Silk 'suggests devolving up to about a quarter of total money spent in Wales to the Welsh Assembly', whereas in fact Silk suggests devolving just £2.2bn, or six per cent of the total £35.3nn spent in Wales.

"And he was equally unclear about when the Government might legislate for Silk Part 1, refusing to confirm that the Government intends to do so before the end of this parliament. This degree of uncertainty is completely unsatisfactory, as the government has already agreed that Silk should unlock access to the borrowing powers which Welsh Labour feels are essential to enable the Welsh Government to invest in economic growth, and the Welsh secretary must now clarify the government's commitment on this point."

You can read today's Commons exchanges here. If that leaves you little the wiser then fortunately, Labour and the government have now agreed to hold a meeting of the Welsh grand committee to discuss the subject "as soon as possible", after which all will doubtless be much clearer. Book your seats now.

David Cornock, Parliamentary correspondent, Wales Article written by David Cornock David Cornock Parliamentary correspondent, Wales

They think it's all over. It is now.

Welsh Secretary David Jones and his deputy Stephen Crabb have been answering MPs' questions for the last time before the summer recess.

Read full article


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 4.

    RE 1 and 2.

    A consensus does not equal a lack of democracy! (with the notable exception of that reached with your better halves). If you can be bothered, start your own party!

    Welsh Labour wants devolution of economic levers? Talk about parking their tank on Plaid's lawn. Outrageous behaviour, but still welcome. Progress, in fact.

    Now we need to hear Kirsty publicly put the squeeze on Nick.

  • rate this

    Comment number 9.

    Independence for Wales, nice thought if you forget the economics and that is what is happening. Not just in Wales but also in Scotland. Strange how any such questions are quickly sidestepped or just ignored. As has been the case here on too many occasions. Even when told that the EU will not be an open door they argue the opposite. It must be nice living in their own little world.........

  • rate this

    Comment number 6.

    Boxer you really are getting like a broken record now. Your advancing years are making you bitter and twisted. I'm sure you'd be happier in that bastion of everything English the SE of England. Whilst lang. shows a drop in speakers in didn't say anything about the majority of public opinion against the use of Welsh. Evidence welcome??

  • rate this

    Comment number 7.

    I never said that there was a majority against the use of Welsh. I am not even sure that there is a majority against positive discrimination for Welsh speakers in employment. Or against the move to a totally bilingual Wales.
    I just feel that enfranchisement would let us know what the support and opposition was to these positions. Yes, evidence would be very welcome.

  • rate this

    Comment number 8.

    Let's hope the Con/ Dems don't do a Richard's Commission and kick it into the long grass like Labour did a few years back that cost tax payers £1m+. The ones who fear these powers are political Neanderthals, True Wales followers or language bigots who are still fearful of the wheel let alone the prospect of self governance opting for the London begging bowl status quo. See 07.


Comments 5 of 13



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.