Nick Clegg: I'm delaying, not blocking boundary changes

 

"Things could look very different in 2015," said the deputy prime minister. "A new constituency map giving votes more equal weight."

That was Nick Clegg's view in August 2010 as he unveiled "My vision for a new political map and voting system". That map included plans to cut the number of MPs from 650 to 600 across the UK (and from 40 to 30 in Wales).

He told readers of the London Evening Standard: "The problem is two-fold: under the current set-up, the value of your vote is determined by where you live; and the voting system by which we elect MPs — First Past the Post — is viewed by many as deeply defective. If we want our elections to be more legitimate, we must tackle both. If we're serious about mending our broken politics, we have to get the basics right."

In October 2010, Mr Clegg told MPs: "I strongly agree with my hon. Friend. It is one of the founding principles of any democracy that votes should be valued in the same way, wherever they are cast. Over the years, all sorts of anomalies have developed, such that different people's votes are simply not worth the same in elections to this place. That surely cannot be right."

Fast forward to August 2012, and - as House of Lords reform bit the dust - Mr Clegg said he would instruct Liberal Democrat MPs to vote against the boundary changes he previously thought were part of the plan to mend our broken politics.

His announcement - "I have told the prime minister that when, in due course, parliament votes on boundary changes for the 2015 election I will be instructing my party to oppose them" - led to headlines suggesting he would block or veto the changes.

That was four months ago. It now appears Mr Clegg still supports the boundary changes but merely wants to delay them - along the lines of an amendment proposed by some Lib Dem peers.

This morning, he told a committee of MPs: "I'm not suggesting you repeal the legislation, I'm just suggesting you delay it by a full parliamentary cycle."

Mr Clegg said that the coalition agreement didn't attach a timetable so his instruction to MPs was not in contradiction to the spirit and letter of that agreement.

The amendment to postpone a boundaries review until 2018 was "entirely consistent" with what he said in August.

"I'm not proposing to unpick the legislation - merely making a change in timetable."

The boundary changes have looked dead in the water for some time (the Tories are choosing parliamentary candidates on the old boundaries) but Mr Clegg's talk of a delay rather than a block held out the prospect of yet another twist in the tale.

 
David Cornock Article written by David Cornock David Cornock Parliamentary correspondent, Wales

Ideas, policies, debates - how to get Wales noticed

Historian Hywel Williams has criticised the "intellectually under-nourished nature" of Welsh political debate.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 65.

    #64 My 'vindictiveness' as you put it consists of a resentment that whereas 80% of the population of Wales in monoglot English, they are marginalised by political parties that, whatever the labels on the tin say, are dominated by the Taffia pushing the country in one direction, in the belief that they know best.
    Where is the English-speaking politician to say 'Thus far and no further'?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 64.

    Well at least you can't blame Plaid or 'Nats' for all this change in subject. It is a Labour Government in Cardiff Bay who will be deciding on this. Same as it was a Westminster Government that brought in legislation to make the Welsh language equal to English in law. They it was who gave us a Welsh channel and Welsh Schools. So why aren't you guiding your vindictiveness against them.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 63.

    #52 'On the language issue children in Billingual Schools master other languages a lot easier '
    Oh Yeh ?

    Reference it or withdraw it. Specifically find us a source from reputable researchers that compares kids in monoglot schools with kids in bilingual schools and shows that their mastery of a third language is statistically superior.
    As they say : Put up or Shut up !

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 62.

    #58 Distinguish for me:
    WLS 'is also calling for Welsh to be made an essential skill for public sector workers,' and my:
    'that all civil servants in Wales should be bilingual?'

    If I am scare-mongering, what is the WLS doing ?
    It's certainly scaring me.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 61.

    ... #56, wooodsey, I don't revel in much these days, I don't even feel a sense of satisfaction that my predictions would prove true.

    But here goes ...

    ... the enemies of the Welsh language are, indifference, Hollywood (modern entertainment), and International English (the language of Business and Diplomacy).

    How do you fight such enemies, not with a Welsh Language Commissioner for sure ..

 

Comments 5 of 65

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.