Minister dashes Severn Bridges tolls cut hope

 

Motorists who assumed the return of the Severn Bridges to public ownership would mean a cut in the tolls can dream on.

UK Transport Minister Stephen Hammond told MPs that although the current concession with a private company will finish at the end of 2018 drivers shouldn't expect to pay less than they currently do (£6 for cars).

Mr Hammond said: "The government still has its own debts to recover from the building and maintaining of the crossing and even at the time of handover that is going to amount to several hundred million."

Some of that reflected the cost of construction; some of it maintenance. He estimated that repayment of the debt would take until the early or mid 2020s.

The return to public ownership may mean that VAT will no longer be payable - but don't expect a reduction in the price you pay.

Mr Hammond told the Welsh affairs select committee: "In terms of the VAT I think it unlikely that the prices will drop because there may be other factors why prices may move and the removal of the VAT may just be able to absorb some of the other pricing pressures.

"I'm not anticipating on the removal of the concession you'll see a drop in the price."

This surprised the committee chairman, David TC Davies (who happens to be the MP for Monmouth) who thought a toll of around £1.50 per driver would cover the maintenance cost.

"Is it forever going to be used as a cash cow?" he complained. "I think people feel angry in Wales about the cost that they currently pay but some of that anger might be alleviated if they knew there was some end in sight and it doesn't look as if you're able to give us that end."

Mr Hammond confirmed that was the case. If Mr Davies wants re-assurance for his constituents perhaps he should ask the Chancellor to give evidence to the committee. It is less than a year since he promised to look at the cost of using the bridges.

Or he could look at his own party's manifesto for the 2011 National Assembly for Wales elections, which promised to:

"Commission a study into the economic effect of bridge tolls in Wales and options to reduce or remove tolls. We will freeze the Severn bridge tolls for cars at their present level."

The committee concluded, leaving Mr Davies time to join other MPs in the chamber to hear the Home Secretary's statement on extradition. This is how Hansard records events:

Mr Speaker: "I call Mr David Davis."

Mr David Davis (Haltemprice and Howden) (Con) rose—

David T. C. Davies (Monmouth) (Con) rose—

Mr Speaker: "Order. We will hear from Top Cat in a moment, not just yet. I should have explained. Mr David Davis—he with the slightly greyer hair and the longer service in the House."

The honourable member for Monmouth (his close friends get to call him TC) duly deferred to the other DD, whose hair is indeed slightly greyer even if his service was briefly interrupted four years ago by his resignation to force a by-election on the issue of civil liberties.

 
David Cornock, Parliamentary correspondent, Wales Article written by David Cornock David Cornock Parliamentary correspondent, Wales

Tax 'slap in the face for Wales'

Plaid Cymru have used a debate on the Finance Bill to highlight differences between Labour in Wales and at the party Westminster.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 2.

    the toll on the severn bridge is an economic strangle hold around the south wales.
    I understand paying for something and recovering investment but once this is done a radical approach is needed with the severn crossing.A minimal charge or free.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 3.

    It is called greed. I wonder what the scale of antagonism would be from the other side,.if the Tolls were reversed and you had to pay to go into England. It is just another nail in the coffin of not giving Wales it's fair share of economic prosperity. No wonder Bristol gets all the finance and Business. You can't blame the Welsh Government for that.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 4.

    Don't you just love transparency? Until we know where all this cash is actually going it can only be considered a 'tax' post 2018.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 5.

    #4 Transparency really doesn't come into it. The Treasury principle has always been that taxes do not provide revenue to be used for purposes related to the source of the tax. Thus if Spearmint Rhini clubs are taxed the revenue is not allocated for providing poledancing facilities.
    So, we know. This is a tax, pure and simple.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 7.

    #6 This is yet another example of 'Commercial Confidentiality'. We, the public, who sign the cheques, may not see the contracts.
    In any contract between the public sector and a private contractor, the client viz the public, should insert a clause saying that the contract will be published six months after its signing. Any private clauses should be rebuttable evidence for corruption.

 

Comments 5 of 9

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.