How independent is independent?

 

This afternoon the Health Minister will get to her feet and present a statement to plenary on "the evidence underpinning the Longley report into health reforms".

It is down for 30 minutes. The opposition parties are already saying that's not enough to deal with the long list of questions they feel they need to ask. Those questions centre on a series of Emails, discovered yesterday by BBC Wales and made public thanks to a Freedom of Information bid.

Our story is here; you'll find analysis of why the Health Minister is having to make that statement here.

Is this story damaging for the Welsh Government? Yes, it is.

Why?

Because there are few, if any, areas of policy making in the Welsh context that are more sensitive and laden with difficulties than health;

because having read the Emails, the three opposition parties are united in condmening them and united in putting pressure on the Minister, a rare sight during this Assembly term;

most of all, because no-one is more keenly aware than Lesley Griffiths that if she's to persuade the Welsh public that she is right to get to grips with the services provided by their local hospitals, she needs to have their trust.

I've sat in conferences where she's made that abundantly clear, listened as she and NHS officials have spelled out the fact that perhaps politicians aren't always the right, most trusted, people to make the case for change and that ordinary NHS workers convinced by the government's plans and independent expertise are needed to persuade ordinary users of the Welsh health service that unless it is changed, it will collapse.

Trust in that independent expertise, then, is key. Just yesterday the Labour AM for Llanelli, Keith Davies, faced local people worried about what 'change' will mean for their local hospital. In his hand, ready to wave, according to an opposition AM also at the meeting, was a copy of Professor Longley's report.

To be clear, Professor Marcus Longley knows the Welsh NHS like the back of his hand. His expertise isn't in question, nor is the fact that he, as author, regularly contacted government officials to ask for data. They hold it, he needed it. How else could he sift through all the information he needed and come to his conclusion?

Any listeners to BBC Wales debates on the future of the health service - to which Professor Longley has regularly contributed - will have a pretty good idea where he stands on the need to centralise some services to deliver a critical mass of expertise. That's a view respected across party lines.

However, the problem arises, say the opposition parties - in the strongest terms - with emails in which Profesor Longley asks civil servants for "killer facts" and seems concerned that the "evidence as presented does not seem to be as incisive as we might have hoped". Who, they ask, is the 'we' in that sentence?

Why, they ask, did he ask the Medical Director of the NHS, a senior Welsh government official, for more data "to sharpen up the document and its impact in supporting the case for change" and why did the same official, Dr Chris Jones, tell Professor Longley that the document "needs to be more positive if possible" and set out a more "persuasive vision".

That stinks, say the opposition parties. It undermines the vital independence of the report. For "sharpen up" they read "sex up".

Professor Longley remains adamant that all he did was gather the information he needed. His report was compiled "without bias or influence".

But the main focus will almost certainly be on the Health Minister herself, who told fellow Assembly Members that his report - a key plank in the government's plans and whose working title, by the way, was "A Case for Change" - was "completely independent".

The Welsh Government say that all their officials did was to provide statistical and other information when asked and that they "did not seek to influence or amend" the report.

"The people of Wales have the choice of believing the evidence based research of an independent and respected academic, or more nonsense from an increasingly desperate opposition. It will be no contest".

No contest? We'll see.

 
Betsan Powys, Political editor, Wales Article written by Betsan Powys Betsan Powys Former political editor, Wales

A big day for health in Wales

A day of big health stories in Wales is capped with a potentially very significant announcement.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 45.

    Boxer that is what I thought we were having and yes it would have been more cost productive. They do that in Prince Charles Merthyr. Taxi Companies are under Contract. Though when I was phoning to find out where it was they told me they are contracted to pick you up for the appointment time. At 9.20 I was told they had just dropped someone off less than15 mins away. Still wouldn't have made it

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 44.

    #42 Alf: that's an important point. If we are going for fewer, bigger DGH+ hospitals, then the transport is crucial and needs more thought, more money and better (possibly more) management.
    For example, if you didn't need an ambulance, would it have been cost-effective for you to have gone - at the right time - by taxi? Such taxi to be NHS-paid. Expand the Hospital Car Service??

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 43.

    #46 Alf, If you need a Centre of Excellence, that's what you need. The problem is geography, not medicine or politics. If you live in Powys, Cromarty or the Outback they aren't going to diagnose or treat your neuroblastoma at the end of the road. They should do your daily dressings change there. Neighbourhood low-tech; central high-tech.
    Your wife visiting daily isn't a factor.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 42.

    I recently had to rely on the Ambulance Service to take me the 30 miles to a NPT Hosp 10.00 procedure appointment. they were Supposed to pick us up in time to be there. it came at 11.00. We got there at 11.45 with 2 other pick ups on the way. I then had to wait at the end of the list for that morning. Now they want to downgrade it. A practicaly brand new excelent Hospital.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 41.

    #37 'When coming up with a plan,you need occasionally to consult private experts,however in this case it was to ENDORSE the plan. '
    If WAG were to set up an enquiry into Evolution, the report would be utterly predictable to all scientists with an interest, whoever the experts chosen to give evidence.
    Thus with NHS Reform: everyone knows where it is going. The problem is the voters.

 

Comments 5 of 45

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.