Churning up the chamber but how?


In the torrent of tweets about translating Assembly committee proceedings, there were pithy, angry and heartfelt remarks aplenty. But one gem made me laugh. Here was proof, said @someoneverywitty, that the true language of the Assembly ought to be the language of dance.

We trooped off to a background briefing on the Wales Infrastructure Investment Plan, wondering whether Jane Hutt and her advisers fancied giving that a go in the said language. It would have involved movements indicating cutting (savagely, of course) and embracing (silos = out, strategic, cross-departmental thinking = in.) In the event, they opted for English.

It's unlikely the language of dance will ever make it into the Assembly chamber but on Sunday Politics Wales you'll find out just how keen some Assembly Members are to, well, liven things up a bit.

A restricted paper from the Business Committee Secretariat to the committee's members - given to the programme - is entitled, "Revitalising Wednesday plenary meetings". It turns out the Presiding Officer, Rosemary Butler, has canvassed the opinions of all but one of 23 new AMs elected in 2011 "to discuss their experiences and impressions of their first year". She may well have caught up with the 23rd by now.

All in all they took a pretty dim view of how things go in the chamber - on a Wednesday in particular. The words "repetitive and formulaic", "lack impact" and "should be more topical" creep in rather a lot.

Bottom line? They want a shake up. That doesn't mean they're up for "muttering idiot" type exchanges but they do believe parts of the current pattern of plenary business is broken and that it needs fixing.

Tune in on Sunday and you'll get a flavour of what AMs feel. Some members, who've been around a little longer than 12 months, think it's time for a pretty radical look not just at how the business is divvied up between Government and Assembly matters, but how AMs behave in the chamber, what they can discuss, what impression you get when you watch them at work and how the chamber itself is set up.

We've got some real clout, is the message from one AM. There are big choices to be made and our parties don't agree on some big, significant stuff. Politics has grown up in Wales. That just doesn't come across. Perception matters. She'd get rid of the in-the-round, non-adversarial chamber and go for a bit of face-to-face heat along with, of course, some light.

Another AM has been talking to constituents who aren't always impressed with seeing their politicians tapping away at computers in the chamber. It may mean that members can be efficient, get on with their work while keeping on eye on the debate, waiting to pounce when they have something to say. But I suspect some AMs fear "pounce" isn't exactly the first word that comes to visitors' (or viewers') minds when they see members staring at the screen, apparently oblivous to what's being said and argued over. There are unflattering comparisons made with bureaucrats at a EU committee meeting. Technocrats might be in vogue but...

Some short debates are described as "toothless". The knock-on effect? "Attendance by other members is low."

What to do? It's clear the Presiding Office believes the answer is "something".

Betsan Powys Article written by Betsan Powys Betsan Powys Former political editor, Wales

A big day for health in Wales

A day of big health stories in Wales is capped with a potentially very significant announcement.

Read full article


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • Comment number 44.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this

    Comment number 43.

    '35: Unlike you I know my Long native history, I’m aware of my heritage and proud, don’t hide behind a British super state'
    I know my heritage: you may remember a certain English author called Shakespeare. 'For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
    Shall be my brother'
    So, I remember the Scots Greys at Waterloo and the Welsh Guards at Ypres: proud citizens of a British super state.

  • Comment number 42.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this

    Comment number 41.

    Yes John but what if you become an also ran to a dog in a talent competition? What are the next steps in the development of humanity in that situation? Or does it mean Britain has gone to the Dogs? The Great British people voted. For a dancing dog. Wonder if it is a member of the Bull (ingdon) dog Club. Sorry Boxer?

  • rate this

    Comment number 40.

    #39 On the smaller drams. You can only use larger drams in a small seam if you cut away a lot of slag from above the seam. Still not good for productivity. But God, not the English.
    On taking part. In college, I was a member of by far the smallest Hall. We usually raised a team to take part, and got thrashed.
    Like the F.A. Cup: it's no disgrace to get beaten by Man U, but if you win...


Comments 5 of 44



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.