English MP criticises choice of St Asaph as new city

 

Barely 24 hours since it was announced that St Asaph is to be made a city, the backlash has begun.

An English Liberal Democrat MP has questioned the "logic" and the "sanity" of giving the award to such a small town.

Sir Bob Russell is MP for Colchester, which lost its own bid for city status. He raised the issue in the Commons during questions to the leader of the house, pointing out that only four of the 11 new cities created during the last 12 years are in England, home to the vast majority of UK residents.

"Can we have a debate on this discrimination against England and the extraordinary criteria of the committee that came up with the conclusions, bearing in mind that in Wales with only two applicants a town with 130,000 population was deemed not appropriate to become a city of the 21st century but a small community of three and a half thousand was.

"Where is the logic and sanity behind that decision?"

Commons leader Sir George Young said there were some questions he was totally unable to begin to answer but he didn't want to get involved in the Essex turf war between Colchester and the new city of Chelmsford.

The awarding of city status - there are three new ones and a lord mayoralty for Armagh - is a decision taken by the Queen on ministerial advice.

The UK government says it won't give any reasons for the success or failure of bids for city status. It says three new cities are being created due to the quality of the bids and in recognition of the significance of every part of the United Kingdom.

Yet when the competition was announced, it was made clear that there would be only one winner. The questions and answers section of the cabinet office website was amended yesterday after three winners were chosen.

This is what the government said when the competition was announced, with the Preseli Pembrokeshire MP Stephen Crabb breaking the traditional silence of the whip's office to tell MPs:

"We regard the bestowing of city status as a signal honour and a rare mark of distinction. Something special will be lost if too many places are granted city status. The Government's expectation is that only one new city will be created as a result of the diamond jubilee competition and, similarly, that only one existing city will be granted a lord mayoralty or lord provostship."

So what changed? Were ministers concerned about alienating those parts of the UK not given a new city? Has "something special" been lost?

If the Queen lives as long as her mother, and ministers remain highly sensitive to sharing out the baubles, we may end up with many more cities.

I may be biased, but is it too soon to launch the campaign for Penarth here?

 
David Cornock, Parliamentary correspondent, Wales Article written by David Cornock David Cornock Parliamentary correspondent, Wales

Tax 'slap in the face for Wales'

Plaid Cymru have used a debate on the Finance Bill to highlight differences between Labour in Wales and at the party Westminster.

Read full article

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 1.

    Penarth? Aren't you short of a cathedral? Or is that not a criteria any more? You could go for that other thing, Lord Provost/Mayor, that would wind up Cardiff City Hall no end!

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 2.

    This so called English Liberal Democrat bad loser obviously doesn't know what constitutes a city past & present, Size isn’t just the criteria or indeed a cathedral to become a city. Although my first choice wouldn't have been St Asaph but Wrexham but I’d like to wish them sincere congratulations for becoming Wales’s newest City and to Bob Russell Mp, grow up you infant!

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 3.

    I can understand Sir Bob Russell's annoyance that the oldest town in Britain, Colchester, was passed over in favour of arch-rival Chelmsford, but that doesn't justify his blaming Wales; if you didn't say he was a Liberal Democrat I would have assumed he was just another typical right-wing Conservative!

    Recognition that the UK is not a single indivisible unit is a hopeful sign for the future.

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 4.

    Colchester was a city when the Wild Welsh were still painting themselves with woad.
    Of course, so were the Iceni but..
    Anyway, have you noticed how Welsh TOWIE looks and sounds??

    #3 'Recognition that the UK is not a single indivisible unit is a hopeful sign for the future.' When in school, we advocated Home Rule for Canvey Island; but then we grew up.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 5.

    Why is the recomendation made by Deputy Clegg and not by the Senedd? Better still leave Mrs Windsor out of the equation and let any community to decide whether to call themselves a city or town. We can then have a laugh at the City of Penarth but after travelling through mid Wales the City of Aberystwyth would seem very appropriate, in fact it seems to be a metropolis.

 

Comments 5 of 12

 

This entry is now closed for comments

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.