Local benefit caps: Labour try to square the circle
A day is a long time in politics. Barely 48 hours ago the Welsh (Labour) government dismissed a Labour idea for a local benefits cap.
"As with regional pay, we totally reject this idea," said a spokesman.
Fast forward 24 hours to the Commons and the man behind the idea of a local benefit cap, shadow work and pensions secretary Liam Byrne, was asked whether he had discussed the idea with his colleagues in Wales.
Mr Byrne told the Commons: "We have indeed had discussions with our colleagues in the Welsh government, who accept the importance of introducing different arrangements for London and other parts of the country and of a solution that recognises the need to localise the benefits system".
The need to square the circle is an occupational hazard in politics, that doesn't sound like a "total rejection" to me.
UPDATE: A Welsh government spokesman e-mails this statement: "The Welsh government does not support the introduction of either a regional or localised welfare benefit cap.
"Local variations in housing costs have existed within the benefits system across the UK for decades."
That's cleared that one up then.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~37~RS~)




Syrian rebels 'share Houla blame'
Re-inventing the wheel
Goodbye, Guardiola
Viewpoint
Children of the Revolution
A franchise future
HARDtalk
Comment number 1.
mr beige2nd February 2012 - 11:24
So its simple, somebody is lying - can you find out who please?
Link to this (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
digbic782nd February 2012 - 12:59
so the point in this article is?I'd love the job of welsh correspondant.an easy life.
Link to this (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
It has to change2nd February 2012 - 13:33
Benefits for those of working age, who can work, ought to be replaced with Hardship LOANS, and regionally capped - linked to the minimum wage (not average salary). If I become unemployed then I would be pleased to receive a hardship loan and willingly repay it once I earn over a threshold.
Link to this (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
David Cornock2nd February 2012 - 13:48
Thank you digbic78. The point of the article was to highlight Labour differences over welfare reform, an issue that matters to millions of people. I'm glad the "easy" role of Welsh correspondent appeals to you but you may find an ability to spell is required....thanks again for your interest.
Link to this (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
It has to change2nd February 2012 - 14:03
David, it's a shame I can't "Like" your articles and comments. It would be great to see an article on how much it actually costs the "average family" (i.e. mummy, daddy and 2.4 children) to live in Wales - oh, and I'm not talking about "entitled needs" of SKY TV, processed / ready-made meals, alcohol and cigarettes. I suspect most families in Wales EARN less than £26K gross!
Link to this (Comment number 5)
Comments 5 of 49