AWEMA: Report number nineteen


I'll keep this short - and it's not at all sweet.

The Wales Audit Office report, published this morning, into the way taxpayers money was given by the Welsh Government to the All Wales Ethnic Minority Association is damning. Turn the pages and you'll find facts, figures, quotes from officials and ministers that point to opportunity after opportunity to stamp out the mismanagement at AWEMA, all missed.


Because alarm bells ringing in one department weren't even heard in other departments.

Because when red lights were flashing - as they did regularly over the years - AWEMA promised things would improve. They didn't but no-one was looking anyway, not properly.

Because while the report concludes - and this is the one bit of good news for the government - that there is no evidence that Labour ministers interfered to protect a body run by a well-known Labour party supporter. It cites the author of one investigation who said he was aware of "the backdrop" of support for AWEMA within the government, that ministers "wanted AWEMA to work". Others point to a worry they'd be accused of discrimination if they spoke out and did more to question what AWEMA was doing with over the years with many millions of pounds.

Another point worth making: that until the Wales Audit Office put their report together, no-one actually knew how much public money had been given to AWEMA. There were many sources, many streams of funding and an overview seems to have been absent when it came to answering the question: just how much?

And a final point: the men from the Audit Office were anything but careful spokespeople-in-suits this morning. They were keen to volunteer the fact that this is just the latest in a long line of reports criticising the way the Welsh Government manages grant funding. It is, in fact, number nineteen, they said in a voice that screamed: we've had a gutsful.

It seems to me that the Wales Audit Office has indeed had enough. It is determined that this report is the one that will act as a wake-up call, that if there has to be a number twenty, it's because lessons are being learned but that changing the culture of management failure is taking time.

There are no ministers out and about responding to such strong and damning critcism. The Welsh Government instead has chosen to issue a statement:

"The report has confirmed there is no evidence that Ministers exerted any inappropriate political influence over funding decisions and always acted in accordance with advice from officials. It also highlights the swift and robust action the Welsh Government took to suspend funding to Awema while protecting those who were delivering programmes through Awema.

"The Welsh Government is already acting on the lessons contained in the Report which will build on the work underway to improve the future management of our grants programme."

Betsan Powys, Political editor, Wales Article written by Betsan Powys Betsan Powys Former political editor, Wales

A big day for health in Wales

A day of big health stories in Wales is capped with a potentially very significant announcement.

Read full article


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 3.

    This is about compliance, or lack of, it seems that either the rules of compliance were shoddy, or those charged with compliance were not up to the task, either way the buck must stop at Carwyn's desk.

    It is incumbent on the First Minister to make sure the electorate/taxpayers are protected from this type of event going unchecked again.

    He's elected to protect the public, he should do so !

  • rate this

    Comment number 6.

    Incompetence aside, it's a shame the report didn't look into whether we need this body. Eventually the racism card has to stop being played and people accept that the only real level playing field is one where no group gets additional treatment. Groups like this only serve to embed discrimination and highten the differences rather than break them down.

  • rate this

    Comment number 5.

    4 Alf - You are right it was run by an influential Labour Party Supporter.
    The big question is what did 60 - yes all 60 AM's do with the previous 18 reports? Yet another failure of governance by the Welsh Assembly - yet people will still blindly defend them. What's the odds on Mab saying its ok for the assembly to be incompetnet because Westminster is incompetent

  • rate this

    Comment number 12.

    ... so alf, you admit scrutiny is non-existent !

    If we have no effective scrutiny what chance democracy ?

  • rate this

    Comment number 23.

    19 Alf - I really dislike liars - I have never once said that Wales was part of England nor would I - an apology is called for but not expected.

    I will say it again - the Assembly failed. Unless you can point to questions from the AM's then it is the AM's fault to hold the WAG to account. Or do you think that AM's should be paid to sit in the Bay and act like nodding dogs


Comments 5 of 73



  • chocolate cake and strawberriesTrick your tongue

    Would this dessert taste different on a black plate?

  • Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Prince George leaving New Zealand'Great ambassadors'

    How New Zealand reacted to William, Kate - and George

  • Major Power Failure ident on BBC2Going live

    Why BBC Two's launch was not all right on the night

  • Front display of radio Strange echoes

    The mysterious 'numbers stations' left over from the Cold War era

  • A letter from a Somali refugee to a Syrian child'Be a star'

    Children's uplifting letters of hope to homeless Syrians

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.