Badger v budget, conjecture v fact

 

Should I blog on the badger or the budget?

It's a close run thing but I sense an over-arching theme here that will let me mention both. Ok, all the talk about decisive action v sensible action, conjecture v proven facts lets me mention both - just about.

Let's start with badgers.

There will be no cull after all. Having considered the evidence put forward by a review he commissioned last year, the Enviornment Minister, John Griffiths, has opted for a badger vaccination project instead. "Labour saves the badger" tweets a Labour spin doctor. "And kills the cattle" adds a Conservative MP.

Perhaps the timing of the announcement suggested someone, somwhere had spotted an early opportunity to set a test - or is that trap - for the former Rural Affairs Minister, Elin Jones, had she won the Plaid Cymru leadership.

She didn't, of course. Leanne Wood did and Elin Jones' response in the chamber, said the Deputy Minister for Agriculture, "showed why she lost." What did she say? "Farmers will now have to decide how best to protect their cattle" adding that "I for one would not blame them for anything they do". That, said Alun Davies is "totally unacceptable".

The 'anything' certainly earned a rebuke from the Presiding Officer.

If you want to pore over the Science Review yourself, you can read it here. You can do so in the knowledge that farming unions have dismissed it as a review based on conjecture, rather than on proven science. What they see is a lack of decisive action. What the Badger Trust sees is a sensible, practical way forward.

So: conjecture v facts and figures, decisive action v a practical way forward. Allow me a segue into tomorrow's budget and one key issue: Regional Pay.

Having hinted that the Chancellor would announce plans to introduce regional pay in tomorrow's budget, the latest nods and winks coming from the other end of the M4 is that he will not. (We're fairly certain electrification of the Valleys lines won't be there either, though a decision on devolving Corporation Tax powers to Northern Ireland might be one to look out for. It would give both Scottish and Welsh leaders something to chew over.)

The Welsh Conservative group leader in the Assembly, Andrew R T Davies has warned in the past about regional pay creating "disparity in parts of the United Kingdom". He'll be happy enough if it's not there.

The Welsh Liberal Democrat leader, Kirsty Williams, has been blunter. She doesn't hide the fact that at this end of the M4, there is no Lib Dem support for regional pay. Neither does she hide the fact that she's told them so - 'them' being UK cabinet ministers.

The First Minister? Regional pay is "code for cutting pay" Carwyn Jones has said in the past. In this afternoon's First Minister's Questions he got his chance to condemn it as a policy "designed to reduce the living standards of those who live in the poorest parts of the UK, a policy designed to increase the wealth gap". I mis-typed there and wrote 'Welsh gap' - a typo Mr Jones might approve of given it rather makes his point for him.

So how about the new Plaid leader, Leanne Wood? She invited the First Minister to join Plaid Cymru in condemning plans for regional pay. He welcomed her support for Labour party policy. She invited him to join her, as Plaid Cymru leader, in a meeting of all four party leaders this very afternoon, so that a sign of cross party unity adn condemnation of regional pay could be sent to the Chancellor. He thanked her but suggested this afternoon might be a bit difficult.

She was nice to him. He was nice to her - on his terms.

Since then, Leanne Wood has written to her fellow leaders asking them to add their signatures to a letter that says: "As leaders of the Welsh political parties, we note with alarm that the current proposals for regional pay to be gradually rolled out across some parts of the public sector have been floated without prior Welsh consultation".

It's getting short shrift. The mood from the leaders isn't 'grow up' exactly; more grow into the job, perhaps. This isn't how they want to do business.

Andrew R T Davies has responded swiftly. "Considering the Chancellor of the Exchequer is yet to even deliver his budget, it would be both unwise and premature to put my name to what is still speculation".

He also finds it "ironic that a leader who stood on a platform of independence is promoting UK rates of regional pay, when you advocate the break-up of the UK."

He'd rather wait for details tomorrow, rather than join in speculation today.

So, I suspect, would you.

 
Betsan Powys, Political editor, Wales Article written by Betsan Powys Betsan Powys Political editor, Wales

A 'good country solicitor' goes home

Ieuan Wyn Jones confirms he's standing down as an Assembly Member. What now?

Read full article

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 1.

    Davies showing up the hypocrisy of Plaid is quite fantastic; make everything regional (unless it doesn't benefit our voters) Plaid cries!

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 2.

    Calm down Mrkilcoyne, Plaid are against Westminster deciding to cut pay in Wales - Plaid want pay decided in Wales.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 3.

    The badger culling policy was agreed by One -Wales government,now abandoned because it was in Labour's election leaflet. What a 'shower' promising to change the law,on a policy that they supported. The Labour Party through Ed Milliband has supported proposal for REGIONAL state benefits,so whats the diff on salaries.The english taxpayers dont want to be paying welsh unaffordable salaries.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 4.

    If Plaid wish to "decide" the level of pay in Wales then isn't it inevitable it will be lower than the rest of the UK? The recent studies have shown this region to be one of the poorest in Europe.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 5.

    4. You are correct in that the 'wealth' of the economy should be able to decide the levels of pay of public employees,S4C/BBC CYMRU et al and if wales wants seperation then that will/should be consequence.LW certainly has the 'cheek' to want to seperate us from england,but wants them to keep funding our lifestyle,more than we can afford!!. The english aint DULL and are just waking up to devoution

 

Comments 5 of 46

 

This entry is now closed for comments

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • Cities and transport in 2050Transport in transit

    With global cities swelling, how will our systems cope and adapt in the future?

Programmes

  • A Cyprus beachFast Track Watch

    How the dream of a home in the sun was turned into a nightmare by the Cyprus banking crisis

BBC © 2013 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.