Dispute over report on 'destitute' asylum seekers

Home Office identity card "Thousands" of people refused asylum remain in the Wales and are living in destitution

Related Stories

Failed asylum seekers are choosing to live destitute rather than claim benefits, says a Swansea University report commissioned by Oxfam.

It claims thousands live in "social and legal limbo" in the UK because of a discouraging claims system.

Oxfam wants a policy change, but think-tank Migration Watch said the report was misleading and risked reducing support for genuine asylum seekers.

The UK Border Agency said every case was considered on its merits.

The report, published by the Centre for Migration Policy Research at Swansea, said when asylum seekers were refused permission to stay in the UK and choose to appeal they opted to go underground rather than apply for financial support and advice.

The research was carried out by a group of refugees and asylum seekers, who spoke to 45 people who were or had been asylum seekers.

Case study


Nikki (not her real name), 34, is from Zimbabwe but is seeking asylum in the UK and living in Cardiff.

She has applied for asylum twice but been turned down and has asked for permission from the High Court to appeal.

If this is granted she will go ahead and appeal but if not she will start a fresh application for asylum.

She said: "My day starts waking up on a mattress on a friend's floor.

"There are various drop-in centres and sessions in different parts of the city all week. I attend as many as possible and that also means I'm not under the feet of whoever is giving me shelter that day."

She often attends the Oasis drop-in held at the YMCA in Cardiff city centre and also a few held at different churches in and around the city including the Trinity Methodist Church in Splott.

She said: "I will usually be given some food for lunch or I can pick up a food parcel or sometimes cash at these sessions."

As a refused asylum seeker who is not willing to return home, Nikki does not receive the accommodation and payment card help from the government to which she would otherwise be entitled.

She said: "I'm very lucky, I haven't gone hungry or had to sleep on the streets. When you are destitute a lot depends on how involved you are with other people around you.

"If you don't know anyone then you will struggle."

Source: Oxfam

Chris Johnes, head of Oxfam Cymru, said: "These are people who have made heartbreaking decisions to leave their families and flee their homes.

"They end up living as ghosts on the streets of Britain because of government policy and decision making that strips them of their rights and dignity.

"The current system is designed to make people feel as low as possible and sends out a message that those who are refused asylum are not even worthy of our compassion."

Asylum seekers normally receive accommodation and cash support of £35.52 a week while their claims are being investigated.

If they are refused then they are moved to "section four support" which consists of accommodation and a payment card with £35.39 a week to spend in a limited number of shops, on the basis they return home as soon as the UK government considers it is safe.

But the report says that because many have "little faith in the system" and think they have been wrongly denied asylum, they do not apply for the support and advice on offer.

Oxfam wants the UK government to continue cash-based support until refused asylum seekers leave voluntarily, are removed or are granted permission to stay.

The charity also called for a better decision-making process for asylum cases as nearly a third of cases are overturned on appeal which, Oxfam said, highlighted the poor quality of the current system.

But Sir Andrew Green, chair of thinktank Migration Watch UK, criticised the report and said it risked undermining public support for genuine asylum seekers.

"Asylum seekers are supported by the taxpayer right through the asylum process, including the appeal stage, and if they fail they can then be further supported while they make arrangements to return home," he said.

Start Quote

It's time that charities gave full support to the rule of law on which the whole asylum system depends”

End Quote Sir Andrew Green Migration Watch UK

"Failure to remove those who, after a long and expensive process, have no further right to be here can only bring the law itself into disrepute.


"It's time that charities, however well meaning, gave full support to the rule of law on which the whole asylum system depends, otherwise they risk undermining public support for those who really are genuine refugees."

Hugh Ind, UK Border Agency regional director, said that every case was carefully considered on its individual merits, taking into consideration the situation in the country of origin.

"However, where we and the courts find someone is not in need of protection we expect them to return home voluntarily.

"We operate a number of schemes to assist people to return to their home countries. However, if they choose not to leave we will enforce their removal.

"We do provide financial support while claims are being dealt with, and no asylum seeker need be destitute while they have a valid reason to be here.

"But we strongly believe that funding those who have found not to be in need of protection would act as an incentive to frustrate the system and stay in the UK."

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

More Wales stories



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.